Literature DB >> 18431395

Comparison of methods for detection of pinworms in mice and rats.

J Camille Effler1, Judy M Hickman-Davis, Julie G Erwin, Samuel C Cartner, Trenton R Schoeb.   

Abstract

Though pinworm infestation remains common in laboratory rodent colonies, there is little information regarding current practices for pinworm detection and their relative efficacy. The authors surveyed research institutions to find out the prevalence of pinworm infestations and the detection methods they used. They also tested mice and rats from colonies that were known to be infested with Syphacia sp. and compared the following detection methods: perianal tape test, fecal flotation, fecal concentration, cecal content examination, cecal flotation and histological examination. Though the different methods yielded comparable efficacy overall, the authors recommend using more than one type of test to increase detection potential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18431395     DOI: 10.1038/laban0508-210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)        ISSN: 0093-7355            Impact factor:   12.625


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of Anthelmintic Resistance and Exhaust Air Dust PCR as a Diagnostic Tool in Mice Enzootically Infected with Aspiculuris tetraptera.

Authors:  Pratibha Kapoor; Yumiko O Hayes; Leslie T Jarrell; Dwight A Bellinger; Rhiannon D Thomas; Gregory W Lawson; Jaclyn D Arkema; Craig A Fletcher; Judith N Nielsen
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  PCR Testing of IVC Filter Tops as a Method for Detecting Murine Pinworms and Fur Mites.

Authors:  Philip M Gerwin; Rodolfo J Ricart Arbona; Elyn R Riedel; Kenneth S Henderson; Neil S Lipman
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 1.232

3.  PCR and RT-PCR in the Diagnosis of Laboratory Animal Infections and in Health Monitoring.

Authors:  Susan R Compton
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 1.232

4.  Interspecies Variation in the Susceptibility of a Wild-Derived Colony of Mice to Pinworms (Aspiculuris tetraptera).

Authors:  Ryan C Curtis; Jill K Murray; Polly Campbell; Yoko Nagamori; Adam Molnar; Todd A Jackson
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 1.232

5.  Evaluation of Traditional and Contemporary Methods for Detecting Syphacia obvelata and Aspiculuris tetraptera in Laboratory Mice.

Authors:  Philip M Gerwin; Rodolfo J Ricart Arbona; Elyn R Riedel; Michelle L Lepherd; Ken S Henderson; Neil S Lipman
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 1.232

6.  Sensitivity of perianal tape impressions to diagnose pinworm (Syphacia spp.) infections in rats (Rattus norvegicus) and mice (Mus musculus).

Authors:  William Allen Hill; Mildred M Randolph; Timothy D Mandrell
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.232

7.  Microbial contaminations of laboratory mice and rats in Taiwan from 2004 to 2007.

Authors:  Chung-Tiang Liang; Amy Shih; Yu-Hsiu Chang; Chiung-Wen Liu; Ya-Tien Lee; Wei-Chun Hsieh; Yuan-Ling Huang; Wan-Tsang Huang; Chih-Hui Kuang; Kan-Hung Lee; Yi-Xing Zhuo; Sheng-Yu Ho; Shiow-Ling Liao; Yi-Ying Chiu; Chieh-Ning Hsu; San-Chi Liang; Chun-Keung Yu
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.232

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.