Literature DB >> 28535863

Evaluation of Anthelmintic Resistance and Exhaust Air Dust PCR as a Diagnostic Tool in Mice Enzootically Infected with Aspiculuris tetraptera.

Pratibha Kapoor1, Yumiko O Hayes2, Leslie T Jarrell3, Dwight A Bellinger2, Rhiannon D Thomas4, Gregory W Lawson5, Jaclyn D Arkema2, Craig A Fletcher2, Judith N Nielsen2.   

Abstract

The entry of infectious agents in rodent colonies occurs despite robust sentinel monitoring programs, strict quarantine measures, and stringent biosecurity practices. In light of several outbreaks with Aspiculuris tetraptera in our facilities, we investigated the presence of anthelmintic resistance and the use of exhaust air dust (EAD) PCR for early detection of A. tetraptera infection. To determine anthelmintic resistance, C57BL/6, DBA/2, and NCr nude mice were experimentally inoculated with embryonated A. tetraptera ova harvested from enzootically infected mice, followed by treatment with 150 ppm fenbendazole in feed, 150 ppm fenbendazole plus 5 ppm piperazine in feed, or 2.1 mg/mL piperazine in water for 4 or 8 wk. Regardless of the mouse strain or treatment, no A. tetraptera were recovered at necropsy, indicating the lack of resistance in the worms to anthelmintic treatment. In addition, 10 of 12 DBA/2 positive-control mice cleared the A. tetraptera infection without treatment. To evaluate the feasibility of EAD PCR for A. tetraptera, 69 cages of breeder mice enzootically infected with A. tetraptera were housed on a Tecniplast IVC rack as a field study. On day 0, 56% to 58% of the cages on this rack tested positive for A. tetraptera by PCR and fecal centrifugation flotation (FCF). PCR from EAD swabs became positive for A. tetraptera DNA within 1 wk of placing the above cages on the rack. When these mice were treated with 150 ppm fenbendazole in feed, EAD PCR reverted to pinworm-negative after 1 mo of treatment and remained negative for an additional 8 wk. The ability of EAD PCR to detect few A. tetraptera positive mice was investigated by housing only 6 infected mice on another IVC rack as a field study. The EAD PCR from this rack was positive for A. tetraptera DNA within 1 wk of placing the positive mice on it. These findings demonstrate that fenbendazole is still an effective anthelmintic and that EAD PCR is a rapid, noninvasive assay that may be a useful diagnostic tool for antemortem detection of A. tetraptera infection, in conjunction with fecal PCR and FCF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28535863      PMCID: PMC5438921     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci        ISSN: 1559-6109            Impact factor:   1.232


  66 in total

Review 1.  The biochemical basis of anthelmintic action and resistance.

Authors:  P Köhler
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.981

2.  Comparison between patterns of pinworm infection (Aspiculuris tetraptera) in wild and laboratory strains of mice, Mus musculus.

Authors:  J M Derothe; C Loubès; A Orth; F Renaud; C Moulia
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.981

Review 3.  An inconvenient truth: global worming and anthelmintic resistance.

Authors:  Ray M Kaplan; Anand N Vidyashankar
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 2.738

4.  Comparison of methods for detection of pinworms in mice and rats.

Authors:  J Camille Effler; Judy M Hickman-Davis; Julie G Erwin; Samuel C Cartner; Trenton R Schoeb
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 12.625

Review 5.  Pinworm infections in laboratory rodents: a review.

Authors:  L F Taffs
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 2.471

6.  Detection of pinworm eggs in the dust of laboratory animals breeding facility, in the cages and on the hands of the technicians.

Authors:  A Lytvynets; I Langrova; J Lachout; J Vadlejch
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 2.471

7.  Treatment and eradication of murine fur mites: I. Toxicologic evaluation of ivermectin-compounded feed.

Authors:  Rodolfo J Ricart Arbona; Neil S Lipman; Elyn R Riedel; Felix R Wolf
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.232

8.  Treatment and eradication of murine fur mites: III. Treatment of a large mouse colony with ivermectin-compounded feed.

Authors:  Rodolfo J Ricart Arbona; Neil S Lipman; Felix R Wolf
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.232

9.  Fenbendazole treatment and litter size in rats.

Authors:  Nancy A Johnston; Jeremiah R Bieszczak; Steven Verhulst; Kimberly E Disney; Kyle E Montgomery; Linda A Toth
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.232

10.  Contemporary prevalence of infectious agents in laboratory mice and rats.

Authors:  Kathleen R Pritchett-Corning; Janice Cosentino; Charles B Clifford
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 2.471

View more
  10 in total

1.  Detection of Lactate Dehydrogenase Elevating Virus in a Mouse Vivarium Using an Exhaust Air Dust Health Monitoring Program.

Authors:  Kerith R Luchins; Darya Mailhiot; Betty R Theriault; George P Langan
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  Cost Comparison of Rodent Soiled Bedding Sentinel and Exhaust Air Dust Health-Monitoring Programs.

Authors:  Kerith R Luchins; Chago J Bowers; Darya Mailhiot; Betty R Theriault; George P Langan
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 1.232

3.  Adoption of Exhaust Air Dust Testing in SPF Rodent Facilities.

Authors:  Christina Pettan-Brewer; Riley J Trost; Lillian Maggio-Price; Audrey Seamons; Susan C Dowling
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 1.232

4.  PCR Testing of IVC Filter Tops as a Method for Detecting Murine Pinworms and Fur Mites.

Authors:  Philip M Gerwin; Rodolfo J Ricart Arbona; Elyn R Riedel; Kenneth S Henderson; Neil S Lipman
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 1.232

5.  PCR and RT-PCR in the Diagnosis of Laboratory Animal Infections and in Health Monitoring.

Authors:  Susan R Compton
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 1.232

6.  PCR Testing of Media Placed in Soiled Bedding as a Method for Mouse Colony Health Surveillance.

Authors:  Wai H Hanson; Kelli Taylor; Douglas K Taylor
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 1.232

7.  Effects of Maternal Fenbendazole on Litter Size, Survival Rate, and Weaning Weight in C57BL/6J Mice.

Authors:  Kristina L Hicks; Elysia Roche; James D Wilkerson; Krista E Lindstrom
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 1.232

8.  An Update on the Biologic Effects of Fenbendazole.

Authors:  Carolyn Cray; Norman H Altman
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 1.565

9.  Comparing Mouse Health Monitoring Between Soiled-bedding Sentinel and Exhaust Air Dust Surveillance Programs.

Authors:  Darya Mailhiot; Allison M Ostdiek; Kerith R Luchins; Chago J Bowers; Betty R Theriault; George P Langan
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 10.  Health Monitoring of Laboratory Rodent Colonies-Talking about (R)evolution.

Authors:  Stephanie Buchheister; André Bleich
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.752

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.