Literature DB >> 28905713

Interspecies Variation in the Susceptibility of a Wild-Derived Colony of Mice to Pinworms (Aspiculuris tetraptera).

Ryan C Curtis1, Jill K Murray2, Polly Campbell3, Yoko Nagamori4, Adam Molnar5, Todd A Jackson2.   

Abstract

Pinworms are common parasites in wild and laboratory rodents. Despite their relative nonpathogenicity in immunocompetent models, pinworm infections add an unwanted variable and may confound some types of research. For this reason, health monitoring programs and biosecurity measures aim to minimize the spread of pinworm infections into colonies free from the organisms. Wild-derived and laboratory strains of mice have shown varied susceptibility to infection with Aspiculuris tetraptera, the most commonly found murine pinworm. In particular, susceptibility is increased in wild-derived mice, young animals, and males. Routine surveillance at our institution revealed pinworm infection (A. tetraptera only) within a colony of multiple, wild-derived species of Mus, although only specific species showed positive results during initial sampling. To assess whether species-associated differences in susceptibility were present, we analyzed fecal egg counts of A. tetraptera in every cage of the colony. Our results revealed significant differences in susceptibility between various species and subspecies of Mus. Egg counts were significantly higher in Mus spicilegus than Mus m. domesticus (WSB/EiJ) and Mus macedonicus. Mus spretus had higher egg counts than M. m. domesticus (WSB/EiJ), M. m. musculus (PWK/PhJ), and M. macedonicus. Egg counts did not differ in regard to age, sex, or number of mice per cage. As wild-derived mouse models continue to compliment research largely based on laboratory strains, it will be important to understand host-parasite interactions and their effects on research, particularly studies evaluating immune responses, behavior, growth, and other physiologic parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28905713      PMCID: PMC5250493     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci        ISSN: 1559-6109            Impact factor:   1.232


  24 in total

1.  Comparison between patterns of pinworm infection (Aspiculuris tetraptera) in wild and laboratory strains of mice, Mus musculus.

Authors:  J M Derothe; C Loubès; A Orth; F Renaud; C Moulia
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.981

2.  Comparison of methods for detection of pinworms in mice and rats.

Authors:  J Camille Effler; Judy M Hickman-Davis; Julie G Erwin; Samuel C Cartner; Trenton R Schoeb
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 12.625

3.  Aspiculuris tetraptera in wild Mus musculus. Age resistance and acquired immunity.

Authors:  J M Behnke
Journal:  J Helminthol       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.170

Review 4.  Pinworm infections in laboratory rodents: a review.

Authors:  L F Taffs
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 2.471

5.  Identification of wild-derived inbred mouse strains highly susceptible to monkeypox virus infection for use as small animal models.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Americo; Bernard Moss; Patricia L Earl
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Longer life spans and delayed maturation in wild-derived mice.

Authors:  Richard A Miller; James M Harper; Robert C Dysko; Stephen J Durkee; Steven N Austad
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2002-07

7.  The influence of filter top caging on the transmission of pinworm infections in mice.

Authors:  R B Wescott; A Malczewski; G L Van Hoosier
Journal:  Lab Anim Sci       Date:  1976-10

8.  Wormy mice in a hybrid zone.

Authors:  R D Sage; D Heyneman; K C Lim; A C Wilson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Nov 6-12       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Contemporary prevalence of infectious agents in laboratory mice and rats.

Authors:  Kathleen R Pritchett-Corning; Janice Cosentino; Charles B Clifford
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 2.471

Review 10.  Thirty years of Mus spretus: a promising future.

Authors:  Lien Dejager; Claude Libert; Xavier Montagutelli
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 11.639

View more
  2 in total

1.  Standardization of an LNA-based TaqMan assay qPCR analysis for Aspiculuris tetraptera DNA in mouse faeces.

Authors:  Keishiro Isayama; Kenji Watanabe; Mariko Okamoto; Tomoaki Murata; Yoichi Mizukami
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 3.605

2.  Morphological Re-Description and 18 S rDNA Sequence Confirmation of the Pinworm Aspiculuris tetraptera (Nematoda, Heteroxynematidae) Infecting the Laboratory Mice Mus musculus.

Authors:  Rewaida Abdel-Gaber; Fathy Abdel-Ghaffar; Saleh Al Quraishy; Kareem Morsy; Rehab Saleh; Heinz Mehlhorn
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 1.402

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.