Literature DB >> 16547114

Effect of varying epistasis on the evolution of recombination.

Roger D Kouyos1, Sarah P Otto, Sebastian Bonhoeffer.   

Abstract

Whether recombination decelerates or accelerates a population's response to selection depends, at least in part, on how fitness-determining loci interact. Realistically, all genomes likely contain fitness interactions both with positive and with negative epistasis. Therefore, it is crucial to determine the conditions under which the potential beneficial effects of recombination with negative epistasis prevail over the detrimental effects of recombination with positive epistasis. Here, we examine the simultaneous effects of diverse epistatic interactions with different strengths and signs in a simplified model system with independent pairs of interacting loci and selection acting only on the haploid phase. We find that the average form of epistasis does not predict the average amount of linkage disequilibrium generated or the impact on a recombination modifier when compared to results using the entire distribution of epistatic effects and associated single-mutant effects. Moreover, we show that epistatic interactions of a given strength can produce very different effects, having the greatest impact when selection is weak. In summary, we observe that the evolution of recombination at mutation-selection balance might be driven by a small number of interactions with weak selection rather than by the average epistasis of all interactions. We illustrate this effect with an analysis of published data of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Thus to draw conclusions on the evolution of recombination from experimental data, it is necessary to consider the distribution of epistatic interactions together with the associated selection coefficients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16547114      PMCID: PMC1526506          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.105.053108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  14 in total

Review 1.  Resolving the paradox of sex and recombination.

Authors:  Sarah P Otto; Thomas Lenormand
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Little evidence for synergism among deleterious mutations in a nonsegmented RNA virus.

Authors:  S F Elena
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Effect of deleterious mutation-accumulation on the fitness of RNA bacteriophage MS2.

Authors:  M de la Peña; S F Elena; A Moya
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  THE GENETIC STRUCTURE OF NATURAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. I. SPONTANEOUS MUTATION RATE OF POLYGENES CONTROLLING VIABILITY.

Authors:  T MUKAI
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Testing for epistasis between deleterious mutations.

Authors:  S A West; A D Peters; N H Barton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  A test for epistasis among induced mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  A D Peters; P D Keightley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  On the evolutionary effect of recombination.

Authors:  I Eshel; M W Feldman
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 1.570

8.  Interaction in fitness between lethal genes in heterozygous condition in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  O Kitagawa
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1967-12       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Evidence for positive epistasis in HIV-1.

Authors:  Sebastian Bonhoeffer; Colombe Chappey; Neil T Parkin; Jeanette M Whitcomb; Christos J Petropoulos
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-11-26       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  A general model for the evolution of recombination.

Authors:  N H Barton
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.588

View more
  19 in total

1.  The evolution of epistasis and its links with genetic robustness, complexity and drift in a phenotypic model of adaptation.

Authors:  Pierre-Alexis Gros; Hervé Le Nagard; Olivier Tenaillon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Effects of recombination on complex regulatory circuits.

Authors:  Olivier C Martin; Andreas Wagner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Interactions between stressful environment and gene deletions alleviate the expected average loss of fitness in yeast.

Authors:  Lukasz Jasnos; Katarzyna Tomala; Dorota Paczesniak; Ryszard Korona
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Quasispecies theory for finite populations.

Authors:  Jeong-Man Park; Enrique Muñoz; Michael W Deem
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2010-01-06

5.  Weak Epistasis May Drive Adaptation in Recombining Bacteria.

Authors:  Brian J Arnold; Michael U Gutmann; Yonatan H Grad; Samuel K Sheppard; Jukka Corander; Marc Lipsitch; William P Hanage
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Modeling multiple infection of cells by viruses: Challenges and insights.

Authors:  Dustin Phan; Dominik Wodarz
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 2.144

7.  Quasispecies theory for horizontal gene transfer and recombination.

Authors:  Enrique Muñoz; Jeong-Man Park; Michael W Deem
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2008-12-23

8.  Epistasis from functional dependence of fitness on underlying traits.

Authors:  Hsuan-Chao Chiu; Christopher J Marx; Daniel Segrè
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Predicting the evolution of sex on complex fitness landscapes.

Authors:  Dusan Misevic; Roger D Kouyos; Sebastian Bonhoeffer
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  The effect of bacterial recombination on adaptation on fitness landscapes with limited peak accessibility.

Authors:  Danesh Moradigaravand; Jan Engelstädter
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.