Literature DB >> 18430847

Diagnosing acute appendicitis in adults: accuracy of color Doppler sonography and MDCT compared with surgery and clinical follow-up.

Diana Gaitini1, Nira Beck-Razi, David Mor-Yosef, Doron Fischer, Ofer Ben Itzhak, Michael M Krausz, Ahuva Engel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to evaluate the accuracy of color Doppler sonography and contrast-enhanced MDCT in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in adults and their utility as a triage tool in lower abdominal pain.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 420 consecutive adult patients, 271 women and 149 men, 18 years old or older, referred from the emergency department to sonography examination for clinically suspected acute appendicitis between January 2003 and June 2006. Patients underwent sonography of the right upper abdomen and pelvis followed by graded compression and color Doppler sonography of the right lower quadrant. CT was performed in 132 patients due to inconclusive sonography findings or a discrepancy between the clinical diagnosis and the sonography diagnosis. Sonography and CT reports were compared with surgery or clinical follow-up as the reference standard. Statistical analyses were performed by Pearson's chi-square test and cross-tabulation software.
RESULTS: Sonography and CT correctly diagnosed acute appendicitis in 66 of 75 patients and in 38 of 39 patients, respectively, and correctly denied acute appendicitis in 312 of 326 and in 92 of 92 patients. Sonography was inconclusive in 17 of 418 cases and CT, in one of 132 cases. Sonography and CT allowed alternative diagnoses in 82 and 42 patients, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for sonography were 74.2%, 97%, 88%, 93%, and 92%, respectively, and for CT, 100%, 98.9%, 97.4%, 100%, and 99%.
CONCLUSION: Sonography should be the first imaging technique in adult patients for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and triage of acute abdominal pain. CT should be used as a complementary study for selected cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18430847     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.2955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  36 in total

1.  Neutral vs positive oral contrast in diagnosing acute appendicitis with contrast-enhanced CT: sensitivity, specificity, reader confidence and interpretation time.

Authors:  D M Naeger; S D Chang; P Kolli; V Shah; W Huang; R F Thoeni
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Serum protein electrophoresis in the evaluation of lytic bone lesions.

Authors:  Lukas M Nystrom; Joseph A Buckwalter; Sergei Syrbu; Benjamin J Miller
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2013

3.  Effect of surgeon's judgement on the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Mustafa Hasbahçeci; Cengiz Erol; Mustafa Törü; Mehmet Şeker
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2014-03-01

4.  Imaging for appendicitis: should radiation-induced cancer risks affect modality selection?

Authors:  Sorapop Kiatpongsan; Lesley Meng; Jonathan D Eisenberg; Maurice Herring; Laura L Avery; Chung Yin Kong; Pari V Pandharipande
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Clinical mimics of acute appendicitis: Is there any role of imaging?

Authors:  Jyotindu Debnath; Vivek Sharma; R Ravikumar; Rajesh Kumar; Samar Chatterjee; Santhanan Sampath; Vijay Chandran; Vinay Maurya; Mukul Bhatia
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2015-03-29

6.  Endometriosis with salpingitis simulating acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Jyotindu Debnath; Rajesh Kumar; Ritu Gupta; Ankit Mathur; S K Gulati; Ashwani Shukla
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

7.  Factors predicting significant pathology on ultrasonography in women presenting with non-specific lower abdominal pain.

Authors:  D K Bilku; T C Hall; A R Dennison; M S Metcalfe; G Garcea
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Profiles of US and CT imaging features with a high probability of appendicitis.

Authors:  A van Randen; W Laméris; H W van Es; W ten Hove; W H Bouma; M S van Leeuwen; E M van Keulen; V P M van der Hulst; O D Henneman; P M Bossuyt; M A Boermeester; J Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Improvement in the diagnosis of appendicitis.

Authors:  Frederick Thurston Drake; David Reed Flum
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  2013

10.  Progress in the diagnosis of appendicitis: a report from Washington State's Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program.

Authors:  Frederick Thurston Drake; Michael G Florence; Morris G Johnson; Gregory J Jurkovich; Steve Kwon; Zeila Schmidt; Richard C Thirlby; David R Flum
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.