Literature DB >> 24027470

Serum protein electrophoresis in the evaluation of lytic bone lesions.

Lukas M Nystrom1, Joseph A Buckwalter, Sergei Syrbu, Benjamin J Miller.   

Abstract

Serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) is often obtained at the initial evaluation of a radiolucent bone lesion of unknown etiology. The results are considered convincing evidence of the presence or absence of a plasma cell neoplasm. The sensitivity and specificity of the SPEP have not been reported in this clinical scenario. Our purpose is to assess the diagnostic value of the SPEP in the initial work-up of the radiolucent bone lesion. We identified 182 patients undergoing evaluation of a radiolucent bone lesion that included tissue biopsy and an SPEP value. We then calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of SPEP as a diagnostic test for a plasma cell neoplasm in this clinical scenario. Forty-six of 182 (25.3%) patients in our series were diagnosed with a plasma cell neoplasm by histopathologic analysis. The sensitivity of SPEP was 71% and the specificity was 83%. PPV was 47% and NPV was 94%. When analyzing only those presenting with multiple lesions, the percentage of patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma increased to 44.7% (34 of 76 patients). The SPEP, however, did not have a substantially increased diagnostic accuracy with sensitivity of 71%, specificity 79%, PPV 40% and NPV 93%. SPEP lacks sensitivity and positive predictive value to provide a definitive diagnosis of myeloma in radiolucent bone lesions, but has a high negative predictive value which may make it useful in ruling out the disease. We recommend that this test either be performed in conjunction with urine electrophoresis, immunofixation electro-phoresis and free light chain assay, or after biopsy confirming the diagnosis of myeloma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24027470      PMCID: PMC3748865     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iowa Orthop J        ISSN: 1541-5457


  15 in total

1.  Mammography screening: truth, lies, and controversy.

Authors:  Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Lytic bone lesions in an Australian population: the results of 100 consecutive biopsies.

Authors:  Mark T Clayer
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.872

3.  The search for the primary tumor in patients with skeletal metastases of unknown origin.

Authors:  M A Simon; E J Bartucci
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1986-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Skeletal metastases of unknown origin. A prospective study of a diagnostic strategy.

Authors:  B T Rougraff; J S Kneisl; M A Simon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Skeletal metastases of unknown origin. Diagnostic strategy for orthopedic surgeons.

Authors:  M A Simon; M B Karluk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Bone marrow histology in myeloma: its importance in diagnosis, prognosis, classification and staging.

Authors:  R Bartl; B Frisch; R Burkhardt; A Fateh-Moghadam; G Mahl; P Gierster; M Sund; G Kettner
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 6.998

7.  Diagnosing acute appendicitis in adults: accuracy of color Doppler sonography and MDCT compared with surgery and clinical follow-up.

Authors:  Diana Gaitini; Nira Beck-Razi; David Mor-Yosef; Doron Fischer; Ofer Ben Itzhak; Michael M Krausz; Ahuva Engel
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Criteria for diagnosis, staging, risk stratification and response assessment of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  R A Kyle; S V Rajkumar
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 11.528

9.  Comparison of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6,630 men.

Authors:  William J Catalona; Jerome P Richie; Frederick R Ahmann; M'Liss A Hudson; Peter T Scardino; Robert C Flanigan; Jean B DeKernion; Timothy L Ratliff; Louis R Kavoussi; Bruce L Dalkin; W Bedford Waters; Michael T MacFarlane; Paula C Southwick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Review of 1027 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Robert A Kyle; Morie A Gertz; Thomas E Witzig; John A Lust; Martha Q Lacy; Angela Dispenzieri; Rafael Fonseca; S Vincent Rajkumar; Janice R Offord; Dirk R Larson; Matthew E Plevak; Terry M Therneau; Philip R Greipp
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.616

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.