Literature DB >> 18427831

Levels of agreement for RR intervals and short-term heart rate variability obtained from the Polar S810 and an alternative system.

David Nunan1, Djordje G Jakovljevic, Gay Donovan, Lynette D Hodges, Gavin R H Sandercock, David A Brodie.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the agreement between HRV measures derived from a time series of RR intervals recorded by a standard 12-lead ECG (CP) and a commercially available RR interval recorder (S810). Thirty-three participants (19 males) (median age 36, range 20-63) underwent simultaneous, 5-min, supine RR-interval recordings. Each RR interval time series was analysed using the software supplied with the recording equipment. Two comparisons were then made. First, a comparison of RR interval data recording and editing only was made. Second, comparisons were made for measures of HRV derived from edited RR interval data. Agreement between RR intervals and standard HRV measures were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient and limits of agreement. Agreement of HRV measures derived from RR intervals recorded and edited by individual systems was not acceptable. Agreement analyses for the number of RR intervals recorded and edited by each systems software showed excellent intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC lower 95% CI > 0.75) and acceptably narrow limits of agreement (LoA). These data indicate that the number of RR intervals recorded by S810 can agree well those recorded from a standard 12-lead ECG. This is true even after application of system specific data editing procedures. Commercial RR-interval recorders may offer a simple, inexpensive alternative to full 12-lead ECG in the recording and editing of RR intervals for subsequent HRV analysis in healthy populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18427831     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-008-0742-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  24 in total

1.  Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science.

Authors:  W G Hopkins
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Influence of age and moderate-intensity exercise training on heart rate variability in young and mature adults.

Authors:  Anthony S Leicht; Graham D Allen; Andrew J Hoey
Journal:  Can J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-06

3.  Reliability of three commercially available heart rate variability instruments using short-term (5-min) recordings.

Authors:  G R H Sandercock; P Bromley; D A Brodie
Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.273

4.  Spectral analysis of heart rate variability: interchangeability between autoregressive analysis and fast Fourier transform.

Authors:  Aurélien Pichon; Manuel Roulaud; Sophie Antoine-Jonville; Claire de Bisschop; André Denjean
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 1.438

5.  Comparison of Polar 810s and an ambulatory ECG system for RR interval measurement during progressive exercise.

Authors:  M Kingsley; M J Lewis; R E Marson
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.118

6.  Statistical evaluation of agreement between two methods for measuring a quantitative variable.

Authors:  J Lee; D Koh; C N Ong
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.589

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Heart rate variability measures: a fresh look at reliability.

Authors:  Gian Domenico Pinna; Roberto Maestri; Antoni Torunski; Ludmila Danilowicz-Szymanowicz; Malgorzata Szwoch; Maria Teresa La Rovere; Grzegorz Raczak
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 6.124

9.  Determinants and interindividual variation of R-R interval dynamics in healthy middle-aged subjects.

Authors:  S M Pikkujämsä; T H Mäkikallio; K E Airaksinen; H V Huikuri
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.733

10.  Five minute recordings of heart rate variability for population studies: repeatability and age-sex characteristics.

Authors:  R Sinnreich; J D Kark; Y Friedlander; D Sapoznikov; M H Luria
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.994

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  [Options and limitations of heart rate measurement and analysis of heart rate variability by mobile devices: A systematic review].

Authors:  Stefan Sammito; Irina Böckelmann
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2016-02-10

2.  Acute effects of stochastic resonance whole body vibration.

Authors:  Achim Elfering; Jasmine Zahno; Jan Taeymans; Angela Blasimann; Lorenz Radlinger
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2013-10-18

3.  Comparison of three mobile devices for measuring R-R intervals and heart rate variability: Polar S810i, Suunto t6 and an ambulatory ECG system.

Authors:  Matthias Weippert; Mohit Kumar; Steffi Kreuzfeld; Dagmar Arndt; Annika Rieger; Regina Stoll
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Impact of functional training on geometric indices and fractal correlation property of heart rate variability in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Marianne P da C de Rezende Barbosa; Luiz C M Vanderlei; Lucas M Neves; Carolina Takahashi; Paula R Dos S Torquato; Ana Claúdia de S Fortaleza; Ismael F Freitas Júnior; Isabel C E Sorpreso; Luiz C Abreu; Andrés R Pérez Riera
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 1.468

5.  The Accuracy of Acquiring Heart Rate Variability from Portable Devices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ward C Dobbs; Michael V Fedewa; Hayley V MacDonald; Clifton J Holmes; Zackary S Cicone; Daniel J Plews; Michael R Esco
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Heart rate variability and lifetime risk of cardiovascular disease: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.

Authors:  Yasuhiko Kubota; Lin Y Chen; Eric A Whitsel; Aaron R Folsom
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.797

7.  Validity of the Polar V800 monitor for measuring heart rate variability in mountain running route conditions.

Authors:  Pere Caminal; Fuensanta Sola; Pedro Gomis; Eduard Guasch; Alexandre Perera; Núria Soriano; Lluis Mont
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Possibilities and limitations of the Polar RS800 in measuring heart rate variability at rest.

Authors:  Martin Benka Wallén; Dan Hasson; Töres Theorell; Barbara Canlon; Walter Osika
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  The validity and reliability of an open source biosensing board to quantify heart rate variability.

Authors:  Joel S Burma; Andrew P Lapointe; Ateyeh Soroush; Ibukunoluwa K Oni; Jonathan D Smirl; Jeff F Dunn
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-05-27

10.  Listen to Your Heart-Ecological Momentary Assessment of Interoceptive Accuracy, Awareness and Sensibility: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Inken Höller; Jana-Sophie Stenzel; Dajana Rath; Thomas Forkmann
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.