Literature DB >> 18427020

Volume-outcome relationship for coronary artery bypass grafting in an era of decreasing volume.

Rocco Ricciardi1, Beth A Virnig, James W Ogilvie, Peter S Dahlberg, Harry P Selker, Nancy N Baxter.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that the recent reduction in procedure volume for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has led to an increase in the in-hospital mortality rate.
DESIGN: Hospital discharge data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from January 1, 1988, through December 31, 2003.
SETTING: A 20% random sample of patients admitted to US hospitals. PATIENTS: All patients who underwent CABG or percutaneous transluminal coronary interventions. Facilities performing CABG were assigned to standard volume cutoffs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of cardiac procedures and the proportion of hospitals meeting standard volume cutoffs, as well as the CABG mortality rate.
RESULTS: During our 16-year study period, the rate of CABG increased from 7.2 cases per 1000 discharges in 1988 to 12.2 cases in 1997 but then decreased to 9.1 cases in 2003, while the rate of percutaneous interventions tripled. For CABG, the proportion of high-volume hospitals declined from 32.5% in 1997 to 15.5% in 2003. Despite shifts between high- and low-volume hospitals, the CABG mortality rate steadily declined from 5.4% in 1988 to 3.3% in 2003. Hospitals performing the lowest volume of CABG experienced the largest decrease in the in-hospital mortality rate.
CONCLUSIONS: Since 1997, CABG volume has declined in the setting of a decrease in in-hospital mortality. A lower mortality rate in the setting of reduced CABG volume is a counterintuitive finding, suggesting that procedure volume is an insufficient predictor of outcome on which to base regionalization strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18427020     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.143.4.338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  11 in total

Review 1.  Appraising the quality of care in surgery.

Authors:  Erik K Mayer; Andre Chow; Justin A Vale; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Adverse outcomes in hip arthroplasty: long-term trends.

Authors:  Brian R Wolf; Xin Lu; Yue Li; John J Callaghan; Peter Cram
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Clinical characteristics and outcomes of Medicare patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty, 1991-2008.

Authors:  Peter Cram; Xin Lu; Peter J Kaboli; Mary S Vaughan-Sarrazin; Xueya Cai; Brian R Wolf; Yue Li
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Surgeon and hospital volume as quality indicators for CABG in Taiwan: examining hazard to mortality and accounting for unobserved heterogeneity.

Authors:  Jason M Hockenberry; Hsien-Ming Lien; Shin-Yi Chou
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Shop for quality or volume? Volume, quality, and outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Andrew D Auerbach; Joan F Hilton; Judith Maselli; Penelope S Pekow; Michael B Rothberg; Peter K Lindenauer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Is the presence of medical trainees associated with increased mortality with weekend admission?

Authors:  Rocco Ricciardi; Jason Nelson; Patricia L Roberts; Peter W Marcello; Thomas E Read; David J Schoetz
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  The Association Between Treatment Frequency and Treatment Outcome for Cardiovascular Surgeries.

Authors:  Ji Suk Choi; Choon Seon Park; Myunghwa Kim; Myo Jeong Kim; Kun Sei Lee; Sung Bo Sim; Hyun Keun Chee; Nam Hee Park; Sung Min Park
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-12-05

8.  Explaining racial/ethnic disparities in use of high-volume hospitals: decision-making complexity and local hospital environments.

Authors:  Karl Kronebusch; Bradford H Gray; Mark Schlesinger
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 1.730

Review 9.  Pro/con debate: do the benefits of regionalized critical care delivery outweigh the risks of interfacility patient transport?

Authors:  Jeffrey M Singh; Russell D MacDonald
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Healthcare quality measurement in orthopaedic surgery: current state of the art.

Authors:  Andrew Auerbach
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.