Literature DB >> 19430828

Appraising the quality of care in surgery.

Erik K Mayer1, Andre Chow, Justin A Vale, Thanos Athanasiou.   

Abstract

There is currently no validated measurement system available for quality of care assessment in surgery despite all of the inherent benefits of such an approach. A structured quality framework needs to be developed and incorporate measures that are truly reflective of several important dimensions of care within the entire treatment episode. Presently this has been only partially addressed. These measures of quality can be categorized into clinical pathway measures (structure of care, process of care, outcome of care, and economic measures of care) and patient-reported measures (patient-reported treatment outcomes, health-related quality of life measures, and patient satisfaction). Combining these measures to create an overall composite quality score can be made feasible only if it is supported by the use of robust statistical methodology. It is important to use appropriate display of performance data to facilitate provider engagement in quality improvement initiatives. This article was designed to present such a structured approach of a quality framework, which is required to appraise the quality of care in surgery to enhance future quality improvement programmes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19430828     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-009-0065-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  50 in total

1.  Inequality in quality: addressing socioeconomic, racial, and ethnic disparities in health care.

Authors:  K Fiscella; P Franks; M R Gold; C M Clancy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-05-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  The volume-outcome relationship: don't believe everything you see.

Authors:  Caprice K Christian; Michael L Gustafson; Rebecca A Betensky; Jennifer Daley; Michael J Zinner
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  It isn't just about choice: the potential of a public performance report to affect the public image of hospitals.

Authors:  Judith H Hibbard; Jean Stockard; Martin Tusler
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.929

4.  Public reporting and pay for performance in hospital quality improvement.

Authors:  Peter K Lindenauer; Denise Remus; Sheila Roman; Michael B Rothberg; Evan M Benjamin; Allen Ma; Dale W Bratzler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome.

Authors:  M M Chowdhury; H Dagash; A Pierro
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Evidence-based medicine and the NHS: a commentary.

Authors: 
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Colin B Begg; Elyn R Riedel; Peter B Bach; Michael W Kattan; Deborah Schrag; Joan L Warren; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  A randomized controlled trial of league tables and control charts as aids to health service decision-making.

Authors:  Tom Marshall; Mohammed A Mohammed; Andrew Rouse
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.038

9.  Volume-outcome relationship for coronary artery bypass grafting in an era of decreasing volume.

Authors:  Rocco Ricciardi; Beth A Virnig; James W Ogilvie; Peter S Dahlberg; Harry P Selker; Nancy N Baxter
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2008-04

10.  Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Tim Doran; Catherine Fullwood; Hugh Gravelle; David Reeves; Evangelos Kontopantelis; Urara Hiroeh; Martin Roland
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  5 in total

1.  The Impact of Healthcare Privatization on Access to Surgical Care: Cholecystectomy as a Model.

Authors:  Ayman Al-Jazaeri; Firas Ghomraoui; Wejdan Al-Muhanna; Ahmed Saleem; Hazem Jokhadar; Tareq Aljurf
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for treating benign liver lesions: assessing quality of life in the first year after surgery.

Authors:  Antonio Giuliani; Carla Migliaccio; Antonio Ceriello; Giuseppe Aragiusto; Giuseppe La Manna; Fulvio Calise
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2014-06

3.  Quality improvement activities for surgical services at district hospitals in developing countries and perceived barriers to quality improvement: findings from Ghana and the scientific literature.

Authors:  Shelly Choo; Dominic Papandria; Seth D Goldstein; Henry Perry; Afua A J Hesse; Francis Abatanga; Fizan Abdullah
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Using a hybrid electronic medical record system for the surveillance of adverse surgical events and human error in a developing world surgical service.

Authors:  Grant Laing; John Bruce; David Skinner; Nikki Allorto; Colleen Aldous; Sandie Thomson; Damian Clarke
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Variation in access to pediatric surgical care among coexisting public and private providers: inguinal hernia as a model.

Authors:  Ayman Al-Jazaeri; Lama Alshwairikh; Manar A Aljebreen; Nourah AlSwaidan; Tarfah Al-Obaidan; Abdulrahman Alzahem
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.526

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.