OBJECTIVE: To search for a possible association of type 1 diabetes with 10 validated type 2 diabetes loci, i.e., PPARG, KCNJ11, WFS1, HNF1B, IDE/HHEX, SLC30A8, CDKAL1, CDKN2A/B, IGF2BP2, and FTO/RPGRIP1L. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Two European population samples were studied: 1) one case-control cohort of 514 type 1 diabetic subjects and 2,027 control subjects and 2) one family cohort of 483 complete type 1 diabetic case-parent trios (total 997 affected). A total of 13 tag single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from the 10 type 2 diabetes loci were analyzed for type 1 diabetes association. RESULTS: No association of type 1 diabetes was found with any of the 10 type 2 diabetes loci, and no age-at-onset effect was detected. By combined analysis using the Wellcome Trust Case-Control Consortium type 1 diabetes data, SNP rs1412829 in the CDKN2A/B locus bordered on significance (P = 0.039) (odds ratio 0.929 [95% CI 0.867-0.995]), which did not reach the statistical significance threshold adjusted for 13 tests (alpha = 0.00385). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the type 2 diabetes loci do not play any obvious role in type 1 diabetes genetic susceptibility. The distinct molecular mechanisms of the two diseases highlighted the importance of differentiation diagnosis and different treatment principles.
OBJECTIVE: To search for a possible association of type 1 diabetes with 10 validated type 2 diabetes loci, i.e., PPARG, KCNJ11, WFS1, HNF1B, IDE/HHEX, SLC30A8, CDKAL1, CDKN2A/B, IGF2BP2, and FTO/RPGRIP1L. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Two European population samples were studied: 1) one case-control cohort of 514 type 1 diabetic subjects and 2,027 control subjects and 2) one family cohort of 483 complete type 1 diabetic case-parent trios (total 997 affected). A total of 13 tag single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from the 10 type 2 diabetes loci were analyzed for type 1 diabetes association. RESULTS: No association of type 1 diabetes was found with any of the 10 type 2 diabetes loci, and no age-at-onset effect was detected. By combined analysis using the Wellcome Trust Case-Control Consortium type 1 diabetes data, SNP rs1412829 in the CDKN2A/B locus bordered on significance (P = 0.039) (odds ratio 0.929 [95% CI 0.867-0.995]), which did not reach the statistical significance threshold adjusted for 13 tests (alpha = 0.00385). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the type 2 diabetes loci do not play any obvious role in type 1 diabetes genetic susceptibility. The distinct molecular mechanisms of the two diseases highlighted the importance of differentiation diagnosis and different treatment principles.
Authors: Alkes L Price; Nick J Patterson; Robert M Plenge; Michael E Weinblatt; Nancy A Shadick; David Reich Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2006-07-23 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Robert Sladek; Ghislain Rocheleau; Johan Rung; Christian Dina; Lishuang Shen; David Serre; Philippe Boutin; Daniel Vincent; Alexandre Belisle; Samy Hadjadj; Beverley Balkau; Barbara Heude; Guillaume Charpentier; Thomas J Hudson; Alexandre Montpetit; Alexey V Pshezhetsky; Marc Prentki; Barry I Posner; David J Balding; David Meyre; Constantin Polychronakos; Philippe Froguel Journal: Nature Date: 2007-02-11 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: S J Huxtable; P J Saker; L Haddad; M Walker; T M Frayling; J C Levy; G A Hitman; S O'Rahilly; A T Hattersley; M I McCarthy Journal: Diabetes Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Mette K Andersen; Maria Sterner; Tom Forsén; Annemari Käräjämäki; Olov Rolandsson; Carol Forsblom; Per-Henrik Groop; Kaj Lahti; Peter M Nilsson; Leif Groop; Tiinamaija Tuomi Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2014-06-07 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: S M Raj; J M M Howson; N M Walker; J D Cooper; D J Smyth; S F Field; H E Stevens; J A Todd Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2009-05-20 Impact factor: 10.122