Literature DB >> 18424145

Fragment-based learning of visual object categories.

Jay Hegdé1, Evgeniy Bart, Daniel Kersten.   

Abstract

When we perceive a visual object, we implicitly or explicitly associate it with a category we know. It is known that the visual system can use local, informative image fragments of a given object, rather than the whole object, to classify it into a familiar category. How we acquire informative fragments has remained unclear. Here, we show that human observers acquire informative fragments during the initial learning of categories. We created new, but naturalistic, classes of visual objects by using a novel "virtual phylogenesis" (VP) algorithm that simulates key aspects of how biological categories evolve. Subjects were trained to distinguish two of these classes by using whole exemplar objects, not fragments. We hypothesized that if the visual system learns informative object fragments during category learning, then subjects must be able to perform the newly learned categorization by using only the fragments as opposed to whole objects. We found that subjects were able to successfully perform the classification task by using each of the informative fragments by itself, but not by using any of the comparable, but uninformative, fragments. Our results not only reveal that novel categories can be learned by discovering informative fragments but also introduce and illustrate the use of VP as a versatile tool for category-learning research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18424145      PMCID: PMC2676719          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.03.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  10 in total

1.  Learning categories at different hierarchical levels: a comparison of category learning models.

Authors:  T J Palmeri
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-09

2.  Visual features of intermediate complexity and their use in classification.

Authors:  Shimon Ullman; Michel Vidal-Naquet; Erez Sali
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 3.  Category use and category learning.

Authors:  Arthur B Markman; Brian H Ross
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Bootstrapped learning of novel objects.

Authors:  Mark J Brady; Daniel Kersten
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 5.  Visual object understanding.

Authors:  Thomas J Palmeri; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning.

Authors:  Merav Ahissar; Shaul Hochstein
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 7.  Object recognition and segmentation by a fragment-based hierarchy.

Authors:  Shimon Ullman
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 8.  Human category learning.

Authors:  F Gregory Ashby; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 24.137

9.  Class information predicts activation by object fragments in human object areas.

Authors:  Yulia Lerner; Boris Epshtein; Shimon Ullman; Rafael Malach
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Mutual information of image fragments predicts categorization in humans: electrophysiological and behavioral evidence.

Authors:  Assaf Harel; Shimon Ullman; Boris Epshtein; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 1.886

  10 in total
  14 in total

Review 1.  The neuroscience of perceptual categorization in pigeons: A mechanistic hypothesis.

Authors:  Onur Güntürkün; Charlotte Koenen; Fabrizio Iovine; Alexis Garland; Roland Pusch
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Basic-level categorization of intermediate complexity fragments reveals top-down effects of expertise in visual perception.

Authors:  Assaf Harel; Shimon Ullman; Danny Harari; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Fragment-based learning of visual object categories in non-human primates.

Authors:  Sarah Kromrey; Matthew Maestri; Karin Hauffen; Evgeniy Bart; Jay Hegdé
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Creating objects and object categories for studying perception and perceptual learning.

Authors:  Karin Hauffen; Eugene Bart; Mark Brady; Daniel Kersten; Jay Hegdé
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Invariant object recognition based on extended fragments.

Authors:  Evgeniy Bart; Jay Hegdé
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  Object recognition in clutter: cortical responses depend on the type of learning.

Authors:  Jay Hegdé; Serena K Thompson; Mark Brady; Daniel Kersten
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Cholinergic control of visual categorization in macaques.

Authors:  Nikolaos C Aggelopoulos; Stefanie Liebe; Nikos K Logothetis; Gregor Rainer
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Task-specific codes for face recognition: how they shape the neural representation of features for detection and individuation.

Authors:  Adrian Nestor; Jean M Vettel; Michael J Tarr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Multi-scale spatial concatenations of local features in natural scenes and scene classification.

Authors:  Xiaoyuan Zhu; Zhiyong Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Making Expert Decisions Easier to Fathom: On the Explainability of Visual Object Recognition Expertise.

Authors:  Jay Hegdé; Evgeniy Bart
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.