Literature DB >> 12055634

Visual features of intermediate complexity and their use in classification.

Shimon Ullman1, Michel Vidal-Naquet, Erez Sali.   

Abstract

The human visual system analyzes shapes and objects in a series of stages in which stimulus features of increasing complexity are extracted and analyzed. The first stages use simple local features, and the image is subsequently represented in terms of larger and more complex features. These include features of intermediate complexity and partial object views. The nature and use of these higher-order representations remains an open question in the study of visual processing by the primate cortex. Here we show that intermediate complexity (IC) features are optimal for the basic visual task of classification. Moderately complex features are more informative for classification than very simple or very complex ones, and so they emerge naturally by the simple coding principle of information maximization with respect to a class of images. Our findings suggest a specific role for IC features in visual processing and a principle for their extraction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12055634     DOI: 10.1038/nn870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   24.884


  108 in total

Review 1.  Contributions of ideal observer theory to vision research.

Authors:  Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Categorical, yet graded--single-image activation profiles of human category-selective cortical regions.

Authors:  Marieke Mur; Douglas A Ruff; Jerzy Bodurka; Peter De Weerd; Peter A Bandettini; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Parallel processing of general and specific threat during early stages of perception.

Authors:  Yuqi You; Wen Li
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Multimap formation in visual cortex.

Authors:  Rishabh Jain; Rachel Millin; Bartlett W Mel
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  A feedforward architecture accounts for rapid categorization.

Authors:  Thomas Serre; Aude Oliva; Tomaso Poggio
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Interpreting fMRI data: maps, modules and dimensions.

Authors:  Hans P Op de Beeck; Johannes Haushofer; Nancy G Kanwisher
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  A rodent model for the study of invariant visual object recognition.

Authors:  Davide Zoccolan; Nadja Oertelt; James J DiCarlo; David D Cox
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Newborn chickens generate invariant object representations at the onset of visual object experience.

Authors:  Justin N Wood
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Modeling guidance and recognition in categorical search: bridging human and computer object detection.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky; Yifan Peng; Alexander C Berg; Dimitris Samaras
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Modeling Search for People in 900 Scenes: A combined source model of eye guidance.

Authors:  Krista A Ehinger; Barbara Hidalgo-Sotelo; Antonio Torralba; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2009-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.