Literature DB >> 17499835

Mutual information of image fragments predicts categorization in humans: electrophysiological and behavioral evidence.

Assaf Harel1, Shimon Ullman, Boris Epshtein, Shlomo Bentin.   

Abstract

Computational models suggest that features of intermediate complexity (IC) play a central role in object categorization [Ullman, S., Vidal-Naquet, M., & Sali, E. (2002). Visual features of intermediate complexity and their use in classification. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 682-687.]. The critical aspect of these features is the amount of mutual information (MI) they deliver. We examined the relation between MI, human categorization and an electrophysiological response to IC features. Categorization performance correlated with MI level as well as with the amplitude of a posterior temporal potential, peaking around 270 ms. Hence, an objective MI measure predicts human object categorization performance and its underlying neural activity. These results demonstrate that informative IC features serve as categorization features in human vision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17499835     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  19 in total

1.  Number representation is influenced by numerical processing level: an ERP study.

Authors:  Junying Liang; Jun Yin; Tong Chen; Hui Chen; Xiaowei Ding; Mowei Shen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Comparing visual representations across human fMRI and computational vision.

Authors:  Daniel D Leeds; Darren A Seibert; John A Pyles; Michael J Tarr
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Fragment-based learning of visual object categories.

Authors:  Jay Hegdé; Evgeniy Bart; Daniel Kersten
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Basic-level categorization of intermediate complexity fragments reveals top-down effects of expertise in visual perception.

Authors:  Assaf Harel; Shimon Ullman; Danny Harari; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Internal representations for face detection: an application of noise-based image classification to BOLD responses.

Authors:  Adrian Nestor; Jean M Vettel; Michael J Tarr
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Fragment-based learning of visual object categories in non-human primates.

Authors:  Sarah Kromrey; Matthew Maestri; Karin Hauffen; Evgeniy Bart; Jay Hegdé
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Introduction to the special issue on functional selectivity in perceptual and cognitive systems--a tribute to Shlomo Bentin (1946-2012).

Authors:  Leon Y Deouell; Kalanit Grill-Spector; Rafael Malach; Micah M Murray; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Image statistics at the point of gaze during human navigation.

Authors:  Constantin A Rothkopf; Dana H Ballard
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.241

9.  Are all types of expertise created equal? Car experts use different spatial frequency scales for subordinate categorization of cars and faces.

Authors:  Assaf Harel; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Task-specific codes for face recognition: how they shape the neural representation of features for detection and individuation.

Authors:  Adrian Nestor; Jean M Vettel; Michael J Tarr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.