Literature DB >> 18423498

Assessment of DNA double-strand breaks and gammaH2AX induced by the topoisomerase II poisons etoposide and mitoxantrone.

Daniel J Smart1, H Dorota Halicka, Gabriele Schmuck, Frank Traganos, Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz, Gary M Williams.   

Abstract

Double-strand breaks (DSBs) are highly deleterious DNA lesions as they lead to chromosome aberrations and/or apoptosis. The formation of nuclear DSBs triggers phosphorylation of histone H2AX on Ser-139 (defined as gammaH2AX), which participates in the repair of such DNA damage. Our aim was to compare the induction of gammaH2AX in relation to DSBs induced by topoisomerase II (TOPO II) poisons, etoposide (ETOP) and mitoxantrone (MXT), in V79 cells. DSBs were measured by the neutral comet assay, while gammaH2AX was quantified using immunocytochemistry and flow cytometry. Stabilized cleavage complexes (SCCs), lesions thought to be responsible for TOPO II poison-induced genotoxicity, were measured using a complex of enzyme-DNA assay. In the case of ETOP, a no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) and lowest observed effect level (LOEL) for genotoxicity was determined; gammaH2AX levels paralleled DSBs at all concentrations but significant DNA damage was not detected below 0.5 microg/ml. Furthermore, DNA damage was dependent on the formation of SCCs. In contrast, at low MXT concentrations (0.0001-0.001 microg/ml), induction of gammaH2AX was not accompanied by increases in DSBs. Rather, DSBs were only significantly increased when SCCs were detected. These findings suggest MXT-induced genotoxicity occurred via at least two mechanisms, possibly related to DNA intercalation and/or redox cycling as well as TOPO II inhibition. Our findings also indicate that gammaH2AX can be induced by DNA lesions other than DSBs. In conclusion, gammaH2AX, when measured using immunocytochemical and flow cytometric methods, is a sensitive indicator of DNA damage and may be a useful tool in genetic toxicology screens. ETOP data are consistent with the threshold concept for TOPO II poison-induced genotoxicity and this should be considered in the safety assessment of chemicals displaying an affinity for TOPO II and genotoxic/clastogenic effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18423498      PMCID: PMC2581813          DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2008.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  41 in total

Review 1.  Histone H2AX in DNA damage and repair.

Authors:  Olga A Sedelnikova; Duane R Pilch; Christophe Redon; William M Bonner
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 2.  The chemical and biological route from podophyllotoxin glucoside to etoposide: ninth Cain memorial Award lecture.

Authors:  H F Stähelin; A von Wartburg
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1991-01-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 3.  The design, synthesis and development of a new class of potent antineoplastic anthraquinones.

Authors:  C C Cheng; R K Zee-Cheng
Journal:  Prog Med Chem       Date:  1983

Review 4.  The role of DNA breaks in genomic instability and tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Kevin D Mills; David O Ferguson; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.988

5.  Detection of DNA double-strand breaks through the cell cycle after exposure to X-rays, bleomycin, etoposide and 125IdUrd.

Authors:  P L Olive; J P Banáth
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.694

6.  DNA damage induced by DNA topoisomerase I- and topoisomerase II-inhibitors detected by histone H2AX phosphorylation in relation to the cell cycle phase and apoptosis.

Authors:  Xuan Huang; Frank Traganos; Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.534

7.  Expression of phosphorylated histone H2AX in cultured cell lines following exposure to X-rays.

Authors:  S H MacPhail; J P Banáth; T Y Yu; E H M Chu; H Lambur; P L Olive
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.694

8.  DNA double-strand breaks measured in individual cells subjected to gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  P L Olive; D Wlodek; J P Banáth
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1991-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 9.  H2AX may function as an anchor to hold broken chromosomal DNA ends in close proximity.

Authors:  Craig H Bassing; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.534

10.  Interactions of antitumor agents Ametantrone and Mitoxantrone (Novatrone) with double-stranded DNA.

Authors:  J Kapuscinski; Z Darzynkiewicz
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1985-12-15       Impact factor: 5.858

View more
  44 in total

1.  Relationship of DNA damage signaling to DNA replication following treatment with DNA topoisomerase inhibitors camptothecin/topotecan, mitoxantrone, or etoposide.

Authors:  Hong Zhao; Paulina Rybak; Jurek Dobrucki; Frank Traganos; Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 4.355

2.  Phosphorylation of H2AX histone as indirect evidence for double-stranded DNA breaks related to the exchange of nuclear proteins and chromatin remodeling in Chara vulgaris spermiogenesis.

Authors:  A Wojtczak; K Popłońska; M Kwiatkowska
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 3.356

3.  Tetrahymena meiotic nuclear reorganization is induced by a checkpoint kinase-dependent response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Josef Loidl; Kazufumi Mochizuki
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 4.  Analysis of individual molecular events of DNA damage response by flow- and image-assisted cytometry.

Authors:  Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz; Frank Traganos; Hong Zhao; H Dorota Halicka; Joanna Skommer; Donald Wlodkowic
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.441

5.  Nuclear accumulation of the papillomavirus E1 helicase blocks S-phase progression and triggers an ATM-dependent DNA damage response.

Authors:  Amélie Fradet-Turcotte; Fanny Bergeron-Labrecque; Cary A Moody; Michaël Lehoux; Laimonis A Laimins; Jacques Archambault
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  A minority of foci or pan-nuclear apoptotic staining of gammaH2AX in the S phase after UV damage contain DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Sebastien de Feraudy; Ingrid Revet; Vladimir Bezrookove; Luzviminda Feeney; James E Cleaver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Influence of selected anti-cancer drugs on the induction of DNA double-strand breaks and changes in gene expression in human hepatoma HepG2 cells.

Authors:  Matjaž Novak; Bojana Žegura; Špela Baebler; Alja Štern; Ana Rotter; Katja Stare; Metka Filipič
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Predictions of genotoxic potential, mode of action, molecular targets, and potency via a tiered multiflow® assay data analysis strategy.

Authors:  Stephen D Dertinger; Andrew R Kraynak; Ryan P Wheeldon; Derek T Bernacki; Steven M Bryce; Nikki Hall; Jeffrey C Bemis; Sheila M Galloway; Patricia A Escobar; George E Johnson
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.216

9.  Aggregation of spectrin and PKCtheta is an early hallmark of fludarabine/mitoxantrone/dexamethasone-induced apoptosis in Jurkat T and HL60 cells.

Authors:  Patrycja M Dubielecka; Michał Grzybek; Adam Kolondra; Bozena Jaźwiec; Anna Draga; Paulina Aleksandrowicz; Monika Kołodziejczyk; Anna Serwotka; Barbara Dolińska-Krajewska; Jerzy Warchoł; Kazimierz Kuliczkowski; Aleksander F Sikorski
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 10.  Impaired DNA damage response--an Achilles' heel sensitizing cancer to chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Authors:  Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz; Frank Traganos; Donald Wlodkowic
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2009-10-18       Impact factor: 4.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.