Literature DB >> 19297526

Tetrahymena meiotic nuclear reorganization is induced by a checkpoint kinase-dependent response to DNA damage.

Josef Loidl1, Kazufumi Mochizuki.   

Abstract

In the ciliate Tetrahymena, meiotic micronuclei (MICs) undergo extreme elongation, and meiotic pairing and recombination take place within these elongated nuclei (the "crescents"). We have previously shown that elongation does not occur in the absence of Spo11p-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Here we show that elongation is restored in spo11Delta mutants by various DNA-damaging agents including ones that may not cause DSBs to a notable extent. MIC elongation following Spo11p-induced DSBs or artificially induced DNA lesions is probably a DNA-damage response mediated by a phosphokinase signal transduction pathway, since it is suppressed by the ATM/ATR kinase inhibitors caffeine and wortmannin and by knocking out Tetrahymena's ATR orthologue. MIC elongation occurs concomitantly with the movement of centromeres away from the telomeric pole of the MIC. This DNA damage-dependent reorganization of the MIC helps to arrange homologous chromosomes alongside each other but is not sufficient for exact pairing. Thus, Spo11p contributes to bivalent formation in two ways: by creating a favorable spatial disposition of homologues and by stabilizing pairing by crossovers. The polarized chromosome orientation inside the crescent resembles the conserved meiotic bouquet, and crescent and bouquet also share the putative function of aiding meiotic pairing. However, they are regulated differently because in Tetrahymena, DSBs are required for entering rather than exiting this stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19297526      PMCID: PMC2675622          DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e08-10-1058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Cell        ISSN: 1059-1524            Impact factor:   4.138


  53 in total

Review 1.  Tetrahymena as a laboratory organism: useful strains, cell culture, and cell line maintenance.

Authors:  E Orias; E P Hamilton; J D Orias
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.441

Review 2.  The cellular response to general and programmed DNA double strand breaks.

Authors:  Craig H Bassing; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2004 Aug-Sep

Review 3.  The initiation of meiotic chromosome pairing: the cytological view.

Authors:  J Loidl
Journal:  Genome       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.166

4.  A conserved function for a Caenorhabditis elegans Com1/Sae2/CtIP protein homolog in meiotic recombination.

Authors:  Alexandra Penkner; Zsuzsanna Portik-Dobos; Lois Tang; Ralf Schnabel; Maria Novatchkova; Verena Jantsch; Josef Loidl
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  A pharmacological map of the PI3-K family defines a role for p110alpha in insulin signaling.

Authors:  Zachary A Knight; Beatriz Gonzalez; Morri E Feldman; Eli R Zunder; David D Goldenberg; Olusegun Williams; Robbie Loewith; David Stokoe; Andras Balla; Balazs Toth; Tamas Balla; William A Weiss; Roger L Williams; Kevan M Shokat
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) produces heat-labile DNA damage but no detectable in vivo DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Cecilia Lundin; Matthew North; Klaus Erixon; Kevin Walters; Dag Jenssen; Alastair S H Goldman; Thomas Helleday
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Macronuclear genome sequence of the ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila, a model eukaryote.

Authors:  Jonathan A Eisen; Robert S Coyne; Martin Wu; Dongying Wu; Mathangi Thiagarajan; Jennifer R Wortman; Jonathan H Badger; Qinghu Ren; Paolo Amedeo; Kristie M Jones; Luke J Tallon; Arthur L Delcher; Steven L Salzberg; Joana C Silva; Brian J Haas; William H Majoros; Maryam Farzad; Jane M Carlton; Roger K Smith; Jyoti Garg; Ronald E Pearlman; Kathleen M Karrer; Lei Sun; Gerard Manning; Nels C Elde; Aaron P Turkewitz; David J Asai; David E Wilkes; Yufeng Wang; Hong Cai; Kathleen Collins; B Andrew Stewart; Suzanne R Lee; Katarzyna Wilamowska; Zasha Weinberg; Walter L Ruzzo; Dorota Wloga; Jacek Gaertig; Joseph Frankel; Che-Chia Tsao; Martin A Gorovsky; Patrick J Keeling; Ross F Waller; Nicola J Patron; J Michael Cherry; Nicholas A Stover; Cynthia J Krieger; Christina del Toro; Hilary F Ryder; Sondra C Williamson; Rebecca A Barbeau; Eileen P Hamilton; Eduardo Orias
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Evidence for the coincident initiation of homolog pairing and synapsis during the telomere-clustering (bouquet) stage of meiotic prophase.

Authors:  H W Bass; O Riera-Lizarazu; E V Ananiev; S J Bordoli; H W Rines; R L Phillips; J W Sedat; D A Agard; W Z Cande
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.285

9.  ASY1 mediates AtDMC1-dependent interhomolog recombination during meiosis in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Eugenio Sanchez-Moran; Juan-Luis Santos; Gareth H Jones; F Christopher H Franklin
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  Bouquet formation in budding yeast: initiation of recombination is not required for meiotic telomere clustering.

Authors:  E Trelles-Sticken; J Loidl; H Scherthan
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  25 in total

1.  Phosphoproteomic analysis of protein phosphorylation networks in Tetrahymena thermophila, a model single-celled organism.

Authors:  Miao Tian; Xiulan Chen; Qian Xiong; Jie Xiong; Chuanle Xiao; Feng Ge; Fuquan Yang; Wei Miao
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 2.  The meiotic checkpoint network: step-by-step through meiotic prophase.

Authors:  Vijayalakshmi V Subramanian; Andreas Hochwagen
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  E2fl1 is a meiosis-specific transcription factor in the protist Tetrahymena thermophila.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Miao Tian; Guan-Xiong Yan; Anura Shodhan; Wei Miao
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  MRE11 and COM1/SAE2 are required for double-strand break repair and efficient chromosome pairing during meiosis of the protist Tetrahymena.

Authors:  Agnieszka Lukaszewicz; Rachel A Howard-Till; Maria Novatchkova; Kazufumi Mochizuki; Josef Loidl
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 5.  Tetrahymena thermophila, a unicellular eukaryote with separate germline and somatic genomes.

Authors:  Eduardo Orias; Marcella D Cervantes; Eileen P Hamilton
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.992

6.  Quantitative proteomics reveals that the specific methyltransferases Txr1p and Ezl2p differentially affect the mono-, di- and trimethylation states of histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27).

Authors:  Chunchao Zhang; Anthony J Molascon; Shan Gao; Yifan Liu; Philip C Andrews
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 5.911

7.  The recombinases Rad51 and Dmc1 play distinct roles in DNA break repair and recombination partner choice in the meiosis of Tetrahymena.

Authors:  Rachel A Howard-Till; Agnieszka Lukaszewicz; Josef Loidl
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Checkpoint Activation of an Unconventional DNA Replication Program in Tetrahymena.

Authors:  Pamela Y Sandoval; Po-Hsuen Lee; Xiangzhou Meng; Geoffrey M Kapler
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 9.  Tetrahymena meiosis: Simple yet ingenious.

Authors:  Josef Loidl
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  A single cohesin complex performs mitotic and meiotic functions in the protist tetrahymena.

Authors:  Rachel A Howard-Till; Agnieszka Lukaszewicz; Maria Novatchkova; Josef Loidl
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.