Literature DB >> 19836377

Impaired DNA damage response--an Achilles' heel sensitizing cancer to chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz1, Frank Traganos, Donald Wlodkowic.   

Abstract

Despite the progress in targeting particular molecular abnormalities specific to different cancers (targeted therapy), chemo- and radiotherapies are still the most effective of all anticancer modalities. Induction of DNA damage and inhibition of cell proliferation are the objects of most chemotherapeutic agents and radiation. Their effectiveness was initially thought to be due to the high rate of proliferation of cancer cells. However, normal cell proliferation rate in some tissues often exceeds that of curable tumors. Most tumors have impaired DNA damage response (DDR) and the evidence is forthcoming that this confers sensitivity to chemo- or radiotherapy. DDR is a complex set of events which elicits a plethora of molecular interactions engaging signaling pathways designed to: (a) halt cell cycle progression and division to prevent transfer of DNA damage to progeny cells; (b) increase the accessibility of the damaged sites to the DNA repair machinery; (c) engage DNA repair mechanisms and (d) activate the apoptotic pathway when DNA cannot be successfully repaired. A defective DDR makes cancer cells unable to effectively stop cell cycle progression, engage in DNA repair and/or trigger the apoptotic program when treated with DNA damaging drugs. With continued exposure to the drug, such cells accumulate DNA damage which leads to their reproductive death that may have features of cell senescence. Cancers with nonfunctional BRCA1 and BRCA2 are particularly sensitive to combined treatment with DNA damaging drugs and inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Antitumor strategies are being designed to treat cancers having particular defects in their DDR, concurrent with protecting normal cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19836377      PMCID: PMC2783472          DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.05.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol        ISSN: 0014-2999            Impact factor:   4.432


  139 in total

Review 1.  The many substrates and functions of ATM.

Authors:  M B Kastan; D S Lim
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  Mitotic and G2 checkpoint control: regulation of 14-3-3 protein binding by phosphorylation of Cdc25C on serine-216.

Authors:  C Y Peng; P R Graves; R S Thoma; Z Wu; A S Shaw; H Piwnica-Worms
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-09-05       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The cytokinetic basis for the design of efficacious radiotherapy protocols.

Authors:  P G Braunschweiger; L L Schenken; L M Schiffer
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Ataxia telangiectasia-mutated phosphorylates Chk2 in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  S Matsuoka; G Rotman; A Ogawa; Y Shiloh; K Tamai; S J Elledge
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and ATM and Rad3-related protein exhibit selective target specificities in response to different forms of DNA damage.

Authors:  Christopher E Helt; William A Cliby; Peter C Keng; Robert A Bambara; Michael A O'Reilly
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-11-08       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Induction of ATM activation, histone H2AX phosphorylation and apoptosis by etoposide: relation to cell cycle phase.

Authors:  Toshiki Tanaka; H Dorota Halicka; Frank Traganos; Karen Seiter; Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 7.  DNA damage repair and response proteins as targets for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Howard B Lieberman
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Premature senescence is a major response to DNA cross-linking agents in BRCA1-defective cells: implication for tailored treatments of BRCA1 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Manuela Santarosa; Laura Del Col; Elena Tonin; Angela Caragnano; Alessandra Viel; Roberta Maestro
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 9.  Secondary BRCA1 and BRCA2 alterations and acquired chemoresistance.

Authors:  Weixin Wang; William D Figg
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.742

10.  WSTF regulates the H2A.X DNA damage response via a novel tyrosine kinase activity.

Authors:  Andrew Xiao; Haitao Li; David Shechter; Sung Hee Ahn; Laura A Fabrizio; Hediye Erdjument-Bromage; Satoko Ishibe-Murakami; Bin Wang; Paul Tempst; Kay Hofmann; Dinshaw J Patel; Stephen J Elledge; C David Allis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  21 in total

1.  Combination of bifunctional alkylating agent and arsenic trioxide synergistically suppresses the growth of drug-resistant tumor cells.

Authors:  Pei-Chih Lee; Rajesh Kakadiya; Tsann-Long Su; Te-Chang Lee
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.715

2.  Curaxins: anticancer compounds that simultaneously suppress NF-κB and activate p53 by targeting FACT.

Authors:  Alexander V Gasparian; Catherine A Burkhart; Andrei A Purmal; Leonid Brodsky; Mahadeb Pal; Madhi Saranadasa; Dmitry A Bosykh; Mairead Commane; Olga A Guryanova; Srabani Pal; Alfiya Safina; Sergey Sviridov; Igor E Koman; Jean Veith; Anton A Komar; Andrei V Gudkov; Katerina V Gurova
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 17.956

3.  Persistent DNA damage caused by low levels of mitomycin C induces irreversible cell senescence.

Authors:  Elise McKenna; Frank Traganos; Hong Zhao; Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 4.  Analysis of individual molecular events of DNA damage response by flow- and image-assisted cytometry.

Authors:  Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz; Frank Traganos; Hong Zhao; H Dorota Halicka; Joanna Skommer; Donald Wlodkowic
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.441

5.  Global gene profiling of spontaneous hepatocellular carcinoma in B6C3F1 mice: similarities in the molecular landscape with human liver cancer.

Authors:  Mark J Hoenerhoff; Arun R Pandiri; Stephanie A Lahousse; Hu-Hua Hong; Tai-Vu Ton; Tiwanda Masinde; Scott S Auerbach; Kevin Gerrish; Pierre R Bushel; Keith R Shockley; Shyamal D Peddada; Robert C Sills
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 1.902

6.  Molecular mechanism of base pairing infidelity during DNA duplication upon one-electron oxidation.

Authors:  Jóhannes Reynisson
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-11-10

7.  A novel ruthenium(II)-polypyridyl complex inhibits cell proliferation and induces cell apoptosis by impairing DNA damage repair.

Authors:  Qingyuan Yang; Zhao Zhang; Wenjie Mei; Fenyong Sun
Journal:  J Chemother       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 1.714

Review 8.  Photodynamic nanomedicine in the treatment of solid tumors: perspectives and challenges.

Authors:  Alyssa Master; Megan Livingston; Anirban Sen Gupta
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 9.776

9.  DNA damage responses in cancer stem cells: Implications for cancer therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  Qi-En Wang
Journal:  World J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-08-26

10.  Chemical Reactivity Window Determines Prodrug Efficiency toward Glutathione Transferase Overexpressing Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Marike W van Gisbergen; Marcus Cebula; Jie Zhang; Astrid Ottosson-Wadlund; Ludwig Dubois; Philippe Lambin; Kenneth D Tew; Danyelle M Townsend; Guido R M M Haenen; Marie-José Drittij-Reijnders; Hisao Saneyoshi; Mika Araki; Yuko Shishido; Yoshihiro Ito; Elias S J Arnér; Hiroshi Abe; Ralf Morgenstern; Katarina Johansson
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.