Literature DB >> 28751952

In-Office Guided Implant Placement for Prosthetically Driven Implant Surgery.

Daryoush Karami1, Hamid Reza Alborzinia1, Reza Amid2, Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh2, Navid Yousefi1, Sarina Badakhshan3.   

Abstract

Application of surgical stents for implant placement via guided flapless surgery is increasing. However, high cost, need for some professional machines, and not taking into account the soft-tissue parameters have limited their application. We sought to design and introduce a technique named in-office guided implant placement (iGIP) to decrease the cost by using available devices in office and enhance the applicability of surgical stents. A customized surgical stent was fabricated based on prosthetic, soft- and hard-tissue parameters by taking into account the amount of available bone (using the computed tomographic [CT] data), soft-tissue thickness and contour (using a composite-covered radiographic stent), and position of the final crown (by diagnostic cast wax up and marking the final crown position with composite). The efficacy of iGIP, in terms of the accuracy of the three-dimensional position of the implant placed in the study cast and in patient's mouth, was confirmed by direct observation and postoperative CT. The iGIP can enhance implant placement in the prosthetically desired position in various types of edentulism. Using this technique minimizes the risk of unwanted consequences, as the soft-tissue thickness and contour are taken into account when fabricating a surgical stent.

Entities:  

Keywords:  flapless approach; guided surgery; implant

Year:  2016        PMID: 28751952      PMCID: PMC5526704          DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1584891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr        ISSN: 1943-3875


  14 in total

1.  A surgical guide for accurate mesiodistal paralleling of implants in the posterior edentulous mandible.

Authors:  Kijvanç Akça; Haldun Iplikçioğlu; Murat C Cehreli
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  A new surgical template with a handpiece positioner for use during flapless placement of four dental implants to retain a mandibular overdenture.

Authors:  Moustafa Abdou Elsyad
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 3.  Computer-guided surgery in implantology: review of basic concepts.

Authors:  Erika Oliveira de Almeida; Eduardo Piza Pellizzer; Marcelo Coelho Goiatto; Rogério Margonar; Eduardo Passos Rocha; Amilcar Chagas Freitas; Rodolfo Bruniera Anchieta
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 4.  Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery--a review.

Authors:  Gerlig Widmann; Reto Josef Bale
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Technology helps an "amateur" place implants.

Authors:  Joseph Whitehouse
Journal:  Dent Today       Date:  2008-11

Review 6.  A systematic review on the accuracy and the clinical outcome of computer-guided template-based implant dentistry.

Authors:  David Schneider; Pascal Marquardt; Marcel Zwahlen; Ronald E Jung
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 7.  Computer-aided manufacturing technologies for guided implant placement.

Authors:  Jörg Neugebauer; Gerhard Stachulla; Lutz Ritter; Timo Dreiseidler; Robert A Mischkowski; Erwin Keeve; Joachim E Zöller
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.166

Review 8.  Clinical advantages of computer-guided implant placement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Margareta Hultin; Krister G Svensson; Mats Trulsson
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 9.  Accuracy of computer-aided implant placement.

Authors:  N Van Assche; M Vercruyssen; W Coucke; W Teughels; R Jacobs; M Quirynen
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.977

10.  Verification of the usability of a navigation method in dental implant surgery: in vitro comparison with the stereolithographic surgical guide template method.

Authors:  Sang-Hoon Kang; Jae-Won Lee; Se-Ho Lim; Yeon-Ho Kim; Moon-Key Kim
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 2.078

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparing Accuracy of Implant Installation with a Navigation System (NS), a Laboratory Guide (LG), NS with LG, and Freehand Drilling.

Authors:  Ting-Mao Sun; Huey-Er Lee; Ting-Hsun Lan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-22       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.