Literature DB >> 18421560

[Cohort studies].

Stefan Mathis1, Gerald Gartlehner.   

Abstract

This article about cohort studies is part of a methods series about study designs and their critical evaluation by the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Health Technology assessment. This article aims to describe the theoretical concept of cohort studies and their typical characteristics. Furthermore, it strives to highlight advantages and disadvantages of this study type and to make suggestions for the critical evaluation of the significance and validity of cohort studies. The article gives an account about characteristics due to the observational design and ways of acquiring control groups. Problems of blurring results by selection bias and confounding are also discussed. Cohort studies are applied in situations where the effects of environmental exposures are measured and rare side effects are identified but randomised controlled studies did not show significant results because of limitations. They are also used to assess the incidence of a disease or a condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18421560     DOI: 10.1007/s10354-008-0516-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5341


  12 in total

1.  Bias and causal associations in observational research.

Authors:  David A Grimes; Kenneth F Schulz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-01-19       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Cohort studies: marching towards outcomes.

Authors:  David A Grimes; Kenneth F Schulz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-01-26       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  When are observational studies as credible as randomised trials?

Authors:  Jan P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-05-22       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Reader's guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 1. Role and design.

Authors:  Paula A Rochon; Jerry H Gurwitz; Kathy Sykora; Muhammad Mamdani; David L Streiner; Susan Garfinkel; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Geoffrey M Anderson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-04-16

Review 5.  Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies.

Authors:  J J Deeks; J Dinnes; R D'Amico; A J Sowden; C Sakarovitch; F Song; M Petticrew; D G Altman
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.014

6.  Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care.

Authors:  N Black
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-05-11

7.  Effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on the risk of fracture.

Authors:  J Brent Richards; Alexandra Papaioannou; Jonathan D Adachi; Lawrence Joseph; Heather E Whitson; Jerilynn C Prior; David Goltzman
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-01-22

8.  Postmenopausal estrogen and progestin use and the risk of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  F Grodstein; M J Stampfer; J E Manson; G A Colditz; W C Willett; B Rosner; F E Speizer; C H Hennekens
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Patterns of use of hormone replacement therapy in one million women in Britain, 1996-2000.

Authors: 
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.531

10.  Estrogen plus progestin and the risk of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  JoAnn E Manson; Judith Hsia; Karen C Johnson; Jacques E Rossouw; Annlouise R Assaf; Norman L Lasser; Maurizio Trevisan; Henry R Black; Susan R Heckbert; Robert Detrano; Ora L Strickland; Nathan D Wong; John R Crouse; Evan Stein; Mary Cushman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Types of medical registries - definitions, methodological aspects and quality of the scientific work with registries].

Authors:  Stefan Mathis-Edenhofer; Brigitte Piso
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2011-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.