Literature DB >> 11830217

Cohort studies: marching towards outcomes.

David A Grimes1, Kenneth F Schulz.   

Abstract

A cohort study tracks two or more groups forward from exposure to outcome. This type of study can be done by going ahead in time from the present (prospective cohort study) or, alternatively, by going back in time to comprise the cohorts and following them up to the present (retrospective cohort study). A cohort study is the best way to identify incidence and natural history of a disease, and can be used to examine multiple outcomes after a single exposure. However, this type of study is less useful for examination of rare events or those that take a long time to develop. A cohort study should provide specific definitions of exposures and outcomes: determination of both should be as objective as possible. The control group (unexposed) should be similar in all important respects to the exposed, with the exception of not having the exposure. Observational studies, however, rarely achieve such a degree of similarity, so investigators need to measure and control for confounding factors. Reduction of loss to follow-up over time is a challenge, since differential losses to follow-up introduce bias. Variations on the cohort theme include the before-after study and nested case-control study (within a cohort study). Strengths of a cohort study include the ability to calculate incidence rates, relative risks, and 95% CIs. This format is the preferred way of presenting study results, rather that with p values.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11830217     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07500-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  65 in total

Review 1.  Isolation measures in the hospital management of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  B S Cooper; S P Stone; C C Kibbler; B D Cookson; J A Roberts; G F Medley; G Duckworth; R Lai; S Ebrahim
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-09-04

2.  Investigational clinical research in implant dentistry: beyond observational and descriptive studies.

Authors:  T Berglundh; W V Giannobile
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Prognosis research and risk of bias.

Authors:  Gennaro D'Amico; Giuseppe Malizia; Mario D'Amico
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  [Cohort studies].

Authors:  Stefan Mathis; Gerald Gartlehner
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2008

5.  An introduction to the fundamentals of cohort and case-control studies.

Authors:  John-Michael Gamble
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2014-09

Review 6.  Coronary heart disease risk factors and outcomes in the twenty-first century: findings from the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study.

Authors:  Hemal Bhatt; Monika Safford; Stephen Glasser
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 7.  Pacifier use and interruption of exclusive breastfeeding: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gabriela Dos Santos Buccini; Rafael Pérez-Escamilla; Larissa Munari Paulino; Clarice Lopes Araújo; Sonia Isoyama Venancio
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Study designs in thoracic surgery research.

Authors:  Andrea Viti; Alberto Terzi; Luca Bertolaccini
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Evidence at a glance: error matrix approach for overviewing available evidence.

Authors:  Frederik Keus; Jørn Wetterslev; Christian Gluud; Cornelis J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  The CIRCORT database: Reference ranges and seasonal changes in diurnal salivary cortisol derived from a meta-dataset comprised of 15 field studies.

Authors:  Robert Miller; Tobias Stalder; Marc Jarczok; David M Almeida; Ellena Badrick; Meike Bartels; Dorret I Boomsma; Christopher L Coe; Marieke C J Dekker; Bonny Donzella; Joachim E Fischer; Megan R Gunnar; Meena Kumari; Florian Lederbogen; Christine Power; Carol D Ryff; S V Subramanian; Henning Tiemeier; Sarah E Watamura; Clemens Kirschbaum
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 4.905

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.