Literature DB >> 18421412

Intervertebral disc replacement for cervical degenerative disease--clinical results and functional outcome at two years in patients implanted with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis.

V Heidecke1, W Burkert, M Brucke, N G Rainov.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This is a prospective study of patients with degenerative cervical disease who underwent ventral discectomy and disc replacement with the Bryan((R)) cervical disc prosthesis. The objective was to investigate clinical outcome at 2 years of patients implanted with the Bryan disc and to evaluate function of the implant itself.
METHODS: Fifty-four consecutive patients with cervical disc herniation and/or spondylosis with preserved mobility in the affected spinal segments were enrolled. Patients presented clinically with cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy with or without neck pain. A standard anterior cervical discectomy was carried out and a Bryan disc was implanted in the affected levels. A total of 59 prosthetic discs were implanted, in 49 patients at a single level and in 5 at two adjacent levels. The neurological status was evaluated pre-operatively and at one and two years thereafter. Plain X-rays, CT, and MRI were used for pre-operative diagnostics. Post-operative follow-up was done by X-rays.
FINDINGS: All patients had an excellent or good neurological outcome according to the Odom criteria. Loss of function (motion range <3 degrees) was found in 7 (12%) out of 59 Bryan discs at two years after surgery. Heterotopic ossification (HO) of the McAffee grades 1-4 was seen in a total of 17 (29%) segments. There were no implant dislocations or migrations.
CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of the Bryan disc resulted in excellent or good neurological outcome in all patients. The surgical technique was safe and without complications. Twelve percent of the implanted Bryan discs lost mobility at two years, mainly due to HO. A trend was seen towards development of HO in the operated segments. Further investigations with longer follow-up periods and with a control group (e.g. fusion with intervertebral cage) will be necessary for a definitive assessment of the long-term functionality and benefits of artificial cervical discs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18421412     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-008-1552-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  17 in total

Review 1.  Prevalence of heterotopic ossification after cervical total disc arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jian Chen; Xinwei Wang; Wanshan Bai; Xiaolong Shen; Wen Yuan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Outcomes of the Bryan cervical disc replacement: fifteen year follow-up.

Authors:  Vincent Pointillart; Jean-Etienne Castelain; Pierre Coudert; Derek Thomas Cawley; Olivier Gille; Jean-Marc Vital
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Polymethylmethacrylate-assisted ventral discectomy: rate of pseudarthrosis and clinical outcome with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.

Authors:  Mario Cabraja; Daniel Koeppen; Wolfgang R Lanksch; Klaus Maier-Hauff; Stefan Kroppenstedt
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Differences between arthroplasty and anterior cervical fusion in two-level cervical degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  Li-Yu Fay; Wen-Cheng Huang; Tzu-Yun Tsai; Jau-Ching Wu; Chin-Chu Ko; Tsung-Hsi Tu; Ching-Lan Wu; Henrich Cheng
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Five-year results of cervical disc prostheses in the SWISSspine registry.

Authors:  Emin Aghayev; Christian Bärlocher; Friedrich Sgier; Mustafa Hasdemir; Klaus F Steinsiepe; Frank Wernli; François Porchet; Oliver Hausmann; Aymen Ramadan; Gianluca Maestretti; Uwe Ebeling; Michal Neukamp; Christoph Röder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Multi-level cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) versus single-level CDA for the treatment of cervical disc diseases: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hua Zhao; Lei Cheng; Yong Hou; Yi Liu; Ben Liu; Jyoti Joshi Mundra; Lin Nie
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Heterotopic ossification and clinical outcome in nonconstrained cervical arthroplasty 2 years after surgery: the Norwegian Cervical Arthroplasty Trial (NORCAT).

Authors:  Jarle Sundseth; Eva Astrid Jacobsen; Frode Kolstad; Ruth O Sletteberg; Oystein P Nygaard; Lars Gunnar Johnsen; Are Hugo Pripp; Hege Andresen; Oddrun Anita Fredriksli; Erling Myrseth; John A Zwart
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-04-09       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Cervical arthroplasty with Discover prosthesis: clinical outcomes and analysis of factors that may influence postoperative range of motion.

Authors:  Jun Li; Lei Liang; Xiao-fei Ye; Min Qi; Hua-jiang Chen; Wen Yuan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes of dynamic cervical implant replacement for treatment of single-level degenerative cervical disc disease: a 24-month follow-up.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Yue-ming Song; Li-ming Liu; Hao Liu; Tao Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Single level cervical disc herniation: A questionnaire based study on current surgical practices.

Authors:  Saeid Abrishamkar; Yousef Karimi; Mohammadreza Safavi; Pouria Tavakoli
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.