Literature DB >> 24474644

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of dynamic cervical implant replacement for treatment of single-level degenerative cervical disc disease: a 24-month follow-up.

Lei Wang1, Yue-ming Song, Li-ming Liu, Hao Liu, Tao Li.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the role of dynamic cervical implant (DCI) replacement for single-level degenerative cervical disc disease in Chinese patients.
METHODS: Thirty patients with single-level degenerative cervical disc disease were prospectively enrolled between April 2010 and August 2010 (12 women, 18 men; mean age 56.5 years). All patients underwent anterior cervical decompression, DCI replacement, clinical and radiological assessments preoperatively and at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Short Form 36 (SF-36) scores. Lateral neutral radiographs provided the intervertebral space height. Lateral dynamic radiographs were taken to measure the range of motion (ROM) of the cervical spine and functional spinal unit (FSU) of the treated segment. We compared the amount of motion of the adjacent vertebral endplate and the intrinsic motion of the implant and calculated a correlation analysis.
RESULTS: DCI showed good clinical and radiographic outcomes. At the final follow-up, JOA, VAS, NDI, and SF-36 average scores improved significantly. The intervertebral space height increased slightly after operation and was maintained during follow up. The ROM of the cervical spine and FSU decreased at early follow-up, but recovered to the preoperative level within 1-2 years. There was a high index of linear correlation between the motion of the adjacent vertebral endplate and the intrinsic motion of the implant.
CONCLUSIONS: DCI provided elastic dynamic stability for the targeted segment, and restored and sustained intervertebral space height and ROM of the cervical spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24474644     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3180-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  26 in total

Review 1.  Prevalence of heterotopic ossification after cervical total disc arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jian Chen; Xinwei Wang; Wanshan Bai; Xiaolong Shen; Wen Yuan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Heterotopic ossification after cervical disc replacement: clinical significance and radiographic analysis. A prospective study.

Authors:  Patrick Guérin; Ibrahim Obeid; Anouar Bourghli; Richard Meyrat; Stéphane Luc; Olivier Gille; Jean-Marc Vital
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 0.500

3.  The Bryan cervical disc prosthesis as an alternative to arthrodesis in the treatment of cervical spondylosis: 46 consecutive cases.

Authors:  J Lafuente; A T H Casey; A Petzold; S Brew
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-04

Review 4.  Cervical disc replacement.

Authors:  Frank M Phillips; Steven R Garfin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Influence of an artificial cervical joint compared with fusion on adjacent-level motion in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease.

Authors:  Crispin Wigfield; Steven Gill; Richard Nelson; Ilana Langdon; Newton Metcalf; James Robertson
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 6.  Outcome analysis of noninstrumented anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion in 348 patients.

Authors:  J C Cauthen; R E Kinard; J B Vogler; D E Jackson; O B DePaz; O L Hunter; L B Wasserburger; V M Williams
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Praveen V Mummaneni; J Kenneth Burkus; Regis W Haid; Vincent C Traynelis; Thomas A Zdeblick
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2007-03

8.  Intervertebral disc replacement for cervical degenerative disease--clinical results and functional outcome at two years in patients implanted with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis.

Authors:  V Heidecke; W Burkert; M Brucke; N G Rainov
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2008-04-20       Impact factor: 2.216

9.  Long term outcome and adjacent disc degeneration after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with titanium cylindrical cages.

Authors:  Taku Sugawara; Yasunobu Itoh; Yoshitaka Hirano; Naoki Higashiyama; Kazuo Mizoi
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  Does rigid instrumentation increase the fusion rate in one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?

Authors:  Dino Samartzis; Francis H Shen; Craig Lyon; Mathew Phillips; Edward J Goldberg; Howard S An
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  8 in total

1.  In vitro investigation of a new dynamic cervical implant: comparison to spinal fusion and total disc replacement.

Authors:  Bastian Welke; Michael Schwarze; Christof Hurschler; Thorsten Book; Stephan Magdu; Dorothea Daentzer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Dynamic cervical stabilization: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Guy Matgé; Peter Buddenberg; Marcus Eif; Holger Schenke; Joerg Herdmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Motion analysis of dynamic cervical implant stabilization versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a retrospective analysis of 70 cases.

Authors:  Zhonghai Li; Huarong Wu; Jin Chu; Mozhen Liu; Shuxun Hou; Shunzhi Yu; Tiesheng Hou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Clinical and radiological features of hybrid surgery in multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  Giovanni Grasso
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Nikhil R Nayak; James H Stephen; Matthew A Piazza; Adetokunbo A Obayemi; Sherman C Stein; Neil R Malhotra
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-07-29

6.  Dynamic Cervical Implants in Patients With Disc Degenerative Disease: A Single-Center Cohort From the Greek Population.

Authors:  Triantafyllos Triantafyllou; Alexandros G Brotis; Efthimios Dardiotis; George Fotakopoulos; Kostas N Fountas; Kostas Paterakis
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-25

7.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of dynamic cervical implant arthroplasty: A 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Li Zou; Xin Rong; Xi-Jiao Liu; Hao Liu
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 1.337

8.  Clinical and radiographic outcome of dynamic cervical implant (DCI) arthroplasty for degenerative cervical disc disease: a minimal five-year follow-up.

Authors:  Lin-Nan Wang; Bo-Wen Hu; Lei Wang; Yue-Ming Song; Xi Yang; Li-Min Liu; Hao Liu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 2.362

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.