Literature DB >> 18417292

A patient-based national survey on postoperative pain management in France reveals significant achievements and persistent challenges.

Dominique Fletcher1, Christophe Fermanian, Alain Mardaye, Philippe Aegerter.   

Abstract

We carried out a national survey on postoperative pain (POP) management in a representative sample (public/private, teaching/non-teaching, size) of 76 surgical centers in France. Based on medical records and questionnaires, we evaluated adult patients 24h after surgery, concerning information: pre and postoperative pain, evaluation, treatment and side effects. A local consultant provided information about POP management. Data were recorded for 1900 adult patients, 69.3% of whom remembered information on POP. Information was mainly delivered orally (90.3%) and rarely noted on the patient's chart (18.2%). Written evaluations of POP were frequent on the ward (93.7%) with appropriate intervals (4.1 (4.0)h), but not frequently prescribed (32.7%). Pain evaluations were based on visual analog scale (21.1%), numerical scale (41.2%), verbal scale (13.8%) or non-numerical tool (24%). Pain was rarely a criterion for recovery room discharge (19.8%). Reported POP was mild at rest (2.7 (1.3)), moderate during movement (4.9 (1.9)) and intense at its maximal level (6.4 (2.0)). Incidence of side effects was similar according to patient (26.4%) or medical chart (25.1%) including mostly nausea and vomiting (83.3%). Analgesia was frequently initiated during anesthesia (63.6%). Patient-controlled analgesia (21.4%) was used less frequently than subcutaneous morphine (35.1%) whose prescription frequently did not follow guidelines. Non-opioid analgesics used included paracetamol (90.3%), ketoprofen (48.5%) and nefopam (21.4%). Epidural (1.5%) and peripheral (4.7%) nerve blocks were under used. Evaluation (63.4%) or treatment (74.1%) protocols were not available for all patients. This national, prospective, patient-based, survey reveals both progress and persistent challenges in POP management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18417292     DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.02.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  43 in total

1.  [External validity of pain-linked functional interference: are we measuring what we want to measure?].

Authors:  J Rothaug; T Weiss; W Meissner
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 2.  Implementation of a standardized pain management in a pediatric surgery unit.

Authors:  B Messerer; A Gutmann; A Weinberg; A Sandner-Kiesling
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  [Use of controlled release opioids in perioperative pain therapy: a standpoint on a new warning advice in the literature on controlled release opioids].

Authors:  E M Pogatzki-Zahn; P K Zahn; R Sabatowski; M Strumpf; S Wirz; A Wiebalck; H Zirngibl; W Meissner
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.107

4.  How patients fare after anaesthesia for elective surgery: a survey of postoperative nausea and vomiting, pain and confusion.

Authors:  Yun Zhi Lee; Ruth Qianyi Lee; Kyu Kyu Thinn; Keah How Poon; Eugene Hern Liu
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.858

Review 5.  Pain after knee arthroplasty: an unresolved issue.

Authors:  Irina Grosu; Patricia Lavand'homme; Emmanuel Thienpont
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  [Social desirability in pain therapy. Response behavior of various professional groups on the implementation of multi-professional pain management].

Authors:  N Nestler; C Maier; J Osterbrink
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.107

7.  Finding the 'ideal' regimen for fentanyl-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: how to give and what to mix?

Authors:  Seokyung Shin; Keoung Tae Min; Yang Sik Shin; Hyung Min Joo; Young Chul Yoo
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.759

8.  [Oral therapy algorithm for the treatment of postoperative pain. A prospective observational study].

Authors:  E M Pogatzki-Zahn; J S Englbrecht; D Pöpping; R Boche; P K Zahn
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 9.  The evolution and practice of acute pain medicine.

Authors:  Justin Upp; Michael Kent; Patrick J Tighe
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 3.750

10.  Quality of postoperative pain management after midfacial fracture repair--an outcome-oriented study.

Authors:  Gregor F Raschke; Andre Peisker; Ulrich Rieger; Gabriel Djedovic; Arndt Guentsch; Oliver Schaefer; Eric Venth; Marta Gomez Dammeier; Winfried Meissner
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.