Literature DB >> 25055745

Quality of postoperative pain management after midfacial fracture repair--an outcome-oriented study.

Gregor F Raschke1, Andre Peisker, Ulrich Rieger, Gabriel Djedovic, Arndt Guentsch, Oliver Schaefer, Eric Venth, Marta Gomez Dammeier, Winfried Meissner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: There is a lack of literature regarding the procedure-specific quality of acute postoperative pain management after midfacial fracture repair. The purpose of the presented prospective clinical study was to evaluate postoperative pain management after surgical repair of midfacial fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-five adults were evaluated on the first postoperative day following midfacial repair using the questionnaire of the Quality Improvement in Postoperative Pain Management (QUIPS) project. The main outcome measures were patients' characteristics and clinical- and patient-reported outcome parameters.
RESULTS: Overall, pain on the first postoperative day was moderate. A significant correlation between process and outcome parameters could be shown. Duration of surgery above the calculated median was significantly associated with higher maximum pain intensity (p = 0.017). Patients requiring opioids in the recovery room presented significantly higher pain on activity (p = 0.029) and maximum pain (p = 0.035). Sleeping impairment (p = 0.001) and mood disturbance (p = 0.008) were significantly more prevalent in patients undergoing repair of a centrolateral midfacial fracture.
CONCLUSIONS: QUIPS is a simple and qualified tool to evaluate the procedure specific quality of acute postoperative pain management. Pain on the first postoperative day following midfacial fracture repair seems overall to be moderate. Nearly a third of the patients showed inadequate postoperative pain management. To prevent inadequate postoperative pain management, it is necessary to establish a continued procedure-specific outcome measurement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25055745     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-014-1283-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  24 in total

Review 1.  Effect of postoperative pain treatment on outcome-current status and future strategies.

Authors:  Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-02-28       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Pain in U.S. nursing homes: validating a pain scale for the minimum data set.

Authors:  B E Fries; S E Simon; J N Morris; C Flodstrom; F L Bookstein
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2001-04

Review 3.  PROSPECT: evidence-based, procedure-specific postoperative pain management.

Authors:  Henrik Kehlet; Roseanne C Wilkinson; H Barrie J Fischer; Frederic Camu
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2007-03

4.  Benchmarking as a tool of continuous quality improvement in postoperative pain management.

Authors:  W Meissner; K Ullrich; S Zwacka
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 5.  Comparative effect of paracetamol, NSAIDs or their combination in postoperative pain management: a qualitative review.

Authors:  M Hyllested; S Jones; J L Pedersen; H Kehlet
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Postoperative pain treatment SIAARTI Recommendations 2010. Short version.

Authors:  G Savoia; D Alampi; B Amantea; F Ambrosio; R Arcioni; M Berti; G Bettelli; L Bertini; M Bosco; A Casati; I Castelletti; M Carassiti; F Coluzzi; A Costantini; G Danelli; M Evangelista; G Finco; A Gatti; E Gravino; C Launo; M Loreto; R Mediati; Z Mokini; E Mondello; S Palermo; F Paoletti; A Paolicchi; F Petrini; Q Piacevoli; A Rizza; A F Sabato; E Santangelo; E Troglio; C Mattia
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Postoperative pain guidelines.

Authors:  Richard W Rosenquist; Jack Rosenberg
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.288

8.  Postoperative Analgesic THerapy Observational Survey (PATHOS): a practice pattern study in 7 central/southern European countries.

Authors:  Dan Benhamou; Marco Berti; Gerhard Brodner; Jose De Andres; Gaetano Draisci; Mariano Moreno-Azcoita; Edmund A M Neugebauer; Wolfgang Schwenk; Luis Miguel Torres; Eric Viel
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Organization of acute pain services: a low-cost model.

Authors:  Narinder Rawal; Lars Berggren
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Acute pain management. Programs in U.S. hospitals and experiences and attitudes among U.S. adults.

Authors:  C A Warfield; C H Kahn
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 7.892

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cranio-maxillofacial reconstruction with microvascular radialis flaps-parameters and correlations of postoperative pain management.

Authors:  Gregor F Raschke; Winfried Meissner; Andre Peisker; Gabriel Djedovic; Ulrich Rieger; Arndt Guentsch; Daria Porwit; Marta Gomez Dammeier; Stefan Schultze-Mosgau
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Implementing a benchmarking and feedback concept decreases postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty: A prospective study including 256 patients.

Authors:  A Benditz; J Drescher; F Greimel; F Zeman; J Grifka; W Meißner; F Völlner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.