Literature DB >> 18416260

Visual function with bilateral implantation of monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Ana Martínez Palmer1, Pablo Gómez Faiña, Antoni España Albelda, Mercé Comas Serrano, Daniel Nahra Saad, Miguel Castilla Céspedes.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate visual function of three types of multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) and one monofocal IOL (as the control group) after cataract surgery.
METHODS: One hundred fourteen patients participated in a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study and received monofocal Tecnis Z9000 (AMO) (n = 24, 48 eyes); symmetric diffractive multifocal Tecnis ZM900 (AMO) (n = 26, 52 eyes); zonal refractive multifocal ReZoom (AMO) (n = 32, 64 eyes); and asymmetric diffractive multifocal TwinSet (Acri.Tec) (n = 32, 64 eyes) IOLs.
RESULTS: Mean binocular distance best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) (logMAR) was 0.05 for controls, 0.08 for ZM900, 0.07 for ReZoom, and 0.11 for TwinSet, with mean binocular distance BSCVA at near of 0.49, 0.06, 0.22, and 0.11, respectively. Mean contrast sensitivity was better for the monofocal IOL group than for the multifocal IOLs. Patients assigned to TwinSet had less favorable contrast sensitivity scores. Patients with monofocal IOLs had more frequently recommended near addition (74%) than those with multifocal IOLs. Patients with refractive ReZoom had also recommended near addition more frequently than the two diffractive groups. The percentage of dysphotopsia phenomena was 81% in patients with diffractive multifocal ZM900 compared with 48% in patients with monofocal IOLs, 53% with refractive ReZoom, and 47% with diffractive TwinSet.
CONCLUSIONS: The monofocal IOL showed better visual function and lesser photic phenomena than multifocal IOLs but patients were spectacle dependent. ReZoom provided better distance BSCVA than the TwinSet diffractive model. Patients with Tecnis and TwinSet diffractive multifocal IOLs were more spectacle independent than patients with ReZoom. Patients with TwinSet had the worst visual function. Patients implanted with the Tecnis diffractive ZM900 were those reporting more photic phenomena.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18416260     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20080301-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  22 in total

Review 1.  Premium intraocular lenses use in patients with cataract and concurrent glaucoma: a review.

Authors:  Raluca Iancu; Catalina Corbu
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2013-09

2.  Effectiveness of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses for cataract surgery and lens replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sumitra S Khandelwal; Jason J Jun; Selene Mak; Marika Suttorp Booth; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Objective evaluation of through-focus optical performance of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses using an optical bench system.

Authors:  Myoung Joon Kim; Len Zheleznyak; Scott Macrae; Hungwon Tchah; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Evaluation of refractive correction for standard automated perimetry in eyes wearing multifocal contact lenses.

Authors:  Kazunori Hirasawa; Hikaru Ito; Yukari Ohori; Yui Takano; Nobuyuki Shoji
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  [Influence of different multifocal intraocular lens concepts on retinal stray light parameters].

Authors:  A Ehmer; T M Rabsilber; A Mannsfeld; M J Sanchez; M P Holzer; G U Auffarth
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Visual outcome and optical quality after bilateral implantation of aspheric diffractive multifocal, aspheric monofocal and spherical monofocal intraocular lenses: a prospective comparison.

Authors:  Pan-Pan Ye; Xia Li; Ke Yao
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Comparison of through-focus image quality across five presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Jay S Pepose; Daozhi Wang; Griffith E Altmann
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2011-12

Review 8.  Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction.

Authors:  Samantha R de Silva; Jennifer R Evans; Varo Kirthi; Mohammed Ziaei; Martin Leyland
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-12-12

9.  Visual Performance of Tecnis ZM900 Diffractive Multifocal IOL after 2500 Implants: A 3-Year Followup.

Authors:  Leonardo Akaishi; Rodrigo Vaz; Graziela Vilella; Rodrigo C Garcez; Patrick F Tzelikis
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  Dissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Maria A Woodward; J Bradley Randleman; R Doyle Stulting
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.351

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.