Literature DB >> 9535937

Position and velocity coupling of postural sway to somatosensory drive.

J Jeka1, K Oie, G Schöner, T Dijkstra, E Henson.   

Abstract

Light touch contact of a fingertip to a stationary surface provides orientation information that enhances control of upright stance. Slight changes in contact force at the fingertip lead to sensory cues about the direction of body sway, allowing attenuation of sway. In the present study, the coupling of postural sway to a moving contact surface was investigated in detail. Head, center of mass, and center of pressure displacement were measured as the contact surface moved rhythmically at 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 Hz. Stimulus amplitude decreased with frequency to maintain peak velocity constant across frequency. Head and body sway were highly coherent with contact surface motion at all frequencies except 0.8 Hz, where a drop-off in coherence was observed. Mean frequency of head and body sway matched the driving frequency </=0.4 Hz. At higher frequencies, non-1:1 coupling was evident. The phase of body sway relative to the touch plate averaged 20-30 degrees at 0.1-Hz drive and decreased approximately linearly to -130 degrees at 0.8-Hz drive. System gain was approximately 1 across frequency. The large phase lags observed cannot be accounted for with velocity coupling alone but indicate that body sway also was coupled to the position of the touch plate. Fitting of a linear second-order model to the data suggests that postural control parameters are not fixed but adapt to the moving frame of reference. Moreover, coupling to both position and velocity suggest that a spatial reference frame is defined by the somatosensory system.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9535937     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1998.79.4.1661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  38 in total

1.  Analysis of human postural responses to recoverable falls.

Authors:  S B Bortolami; P DiZio; E Rabin; J R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Detecting postural responses to sinusoidal sensory inputs: a statistical approach.

Authors:  Patrick J Sparto; Jeffrey G Jasko; Patrick J Loughlin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.802

3.  EEG frequency analysis of cortical brain activities induced by effect of light touch.

Authors:  Tomoya Ishigaki; Kozo Ueta; Ryota Imai; Shu Morioka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Coordination of muscle torques stabilizes upright standing posture: an UCM analysis.

Authors:  Eunse Park; Hendrik Reimann; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Balance control under different passive contributions of the ankle extensors: quiet standing on inclined surfaces.

Authors:  Shun Sasagawa; Junichi Ushiyama; Kei Masani; Motoki Kouzaki; Hiroaki Kanehisa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Feedforward ankle strategy of balance during quiet stance in adults.

Authors:  P Gatev; S Thomas; T Kepple; M Hallett
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-02-01       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 7.  The effect of reduced somatosensation on standing balance: a systematic review.

Authors:  H J J Cojanne Kars; Juha M Hijmans; Jan H B Geertzen; Wiebren Zijlstra
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

8.  Effects of support surface stability on feedback control of trunk posture.

Authors:  Georgia Andreopoulou; Erwin Maaswinkel; L Eduardo Cofré Lizama; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  How visual information links to multijoint coordination during quiet standing.

Authors:  J P Scholz; E Park; J J Jeka; G Schöner; T Kiemel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Postural control in children. Coupling to dynamic somatosensory information.

Authors:  José A Barela; John J Jeka; Jane E Clark
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.