Literature DB >> 18411535

Age of face matters: age-group differences in ratings of young and old faces.

Natalie C Ebner1.   

Abstract

Young (n = 24) and old (n = 24) participants rated 160 faces of young and old individuals taken from the CAL/PAL Face Database (Minear & Park, 2004) with regard to attractiveness, likeability, distinctiveness, goal orientation, energy, mood, and age. Ratings are reported for each face separately. Further analyses showed that the age groups differed in their ratings of young and old faces. On average, old participants evaluated the faces as more positive (i.e., more attractive, more energetic) than did young participants. In line with research on a negative aging stereotype, old faces were judged as less positive than young faces. They were, for instance, seen as less attractive, less likeable, less distinctive, less growth-oriented, and less energetic. The findings of the present study can serve as a basis for the selection of appropriate facial stimuli in age-comparative studies of face perception, face processing, or memory for faces. All face-specific data are archived at www.psychonomic.org/archive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18411535     DOI: 10.3758/brm.40.1.130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  34 in total

1.  Electrophysiological correlates of processing faces of younger and older individuals.

Authors:  Natalie C Ebner; Yi He; Harlan M Fichtenholtz; Gregory McCarthy; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Test-retest reliability of effective connectivity in the face perception network.

Authors:  Stefan Frässle; Frieder Michel Paulus; Sören Krach; Andreas Jansen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Neural decoding of visual stimuli varies with fluctuations in global network efficiency.

Authors:  Luca Cocchi; Zhengyi Yang; Andrew Zalesky; Johannes Stelzer; Luke J Hearne; Leonardo L Gollo; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Age Differences in the Differentiation of Trait Impressions From Faces.

Authors:  Stacey Y Ng; Leslie A Zebrowitz; Robert G Franklin
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 4.077

5.  Smiling makes you look older.

Authors:  Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

6.  Double standards in body evaluation? The influence of identification with body stimuli on ratings of attractiveness, body fat, and muscle mass.

Authors:  Mona M Voges; Claire-Marie Giabbiconi; Benjamin Schöne; Manuel Waldorf; Andrea S Hartmann; Silja Vocks
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 4.652

7.  Emotion identification across adulthood using the Dynamic FACES database of emotional expressions in younger, middle aged, and older adults.

Authors:  Catherine A C Holland; Natalie C Ebner; Tian Lin; Gregory R Samanez-Larkin
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2018-03-29

8.  The effects of face attractiveness on face memory depend on both age of perceiver and age of face.

Authors:  Tian Lin; Håkan Fischer; Marcia K Johnson; Natalie C Ebner
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2019-11-20

9.  WHAT PREDICTS THE OWN-AGE BIAS IN FACE RECOGNITION MEMORY?

Authors:  Yi He; Natalie C Ebner; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  Soc Cogn       Date:  2011-01-27

10.  Age Differences in Explicit and Implicit Age Attitudes Across the Life Span.

Authors:  William J Chopik; Hannah L Giasson
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2017-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.