Literature DB >> 18410232

Theoretical implications of the biomechanical fracture threshold.

Tony M Keaveny1, Mary L Bouxsein.   

Abstract

Because of the dichotomous nature of a bone fracture, when Phi, the ratio of the applied impact force to the bone strength, is greater than a critical value--the biomechanical fracture threshold--fracture should occur. We sought to elucidate the conceptual implications of this biomechanical fracture threshold with application to hip fracture. We used data from the PaTH study, a 2-yr clinical trial in postmenopausal women treated with alendronate, PTH, or their combination. Outcomes included the force applied to the hip in a sideways fall as estimated from subject height and weight; femoral strength as determined by QCT-based finite element analysis; the load-to-strength ratio Phi; and total hip areal BMD from DXA. Results indicated that those with "very low" femoral strength (<2000 N) invariably had load-to-strength ratio Phi values well above the theoretical biomechanical fracture threshold (Phi = 1), but those with "moderately low" femoral strength (2000-4000 N) displayed Phi values both above and below the theoretical biomechanical fracture threshold. This finding implies that the risk of a hip fracture can be high in those with only moderately low BMD because femoral strength can be low relative to fall impact forces. The observed weak correlation between areal BMD and the load-to-strength ratio Phi (r2 = 0.14) suggests that consideration of the biomechanical fracture threshold may improve fracture risk assessment, particularly for those in the osteopenic range. Regarding treatment effects, only those subjects having load-to-strength ratio Phi values within a relatively narrow "transition zone" of +/- 20% of the assumed biomechanical fracture threshold at baseline were predicted to change fracture status during the trial. In theory, outcomes of fracture trials may be dominated by the responses of those within the "transition zone" at baseline, and treatment benefits in terms of fracture efficacy may depend the patient's baseline status with respect to the biomechanical fracture threshold. We conclude that consideration of the theoretical implications of the biomechanical fracture threshold may lead to new insights and advances in the assessment and treatment of osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18410232      PMCID: PMC2684155          DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.080406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  45 in total

1.  Fracture risk reduction with alendronate in women with osteoporosis: the Fracture Intervention Trial. FIT Research Group.

Authors:  D M Black; D E Thompson; D C Bauer; K Ensrud; T Musliner; M C Hochberg; M C Nevitt; S Suryawanshi; S R Cummings
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Quantitative computed tomography-based finite element models of the human lumbar vertebral body: effect of element size on stiffness, damage, and fracture strength predictions.

Authors:  R Paul Crawford; William S Rosenberg; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Finite element modeling of the human thoracolumbar spine.

Authors:  Michael A K Liebschner; David L Kopperdahl; William S Rosenberg; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Improved prediction of proximal femoral fracture load using nonlinear finite element models.

Authors:  J H Keyak
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  An assessment tool for predicting fracture risk in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  D M Black; M Steinbuch; L Palermo; P Dargent-Molina; R Lindsay; M S Hoseyni; O Johnell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  The biomechanical basis of vertebral body fragility in men and women.

Authors:  Y Duan; E Seeman; C H Turner
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Improvement in spine bone density and reduction in risk of vertebral fractures during treatment with antiresorptive drugs.

Authors:  Steven R Cummings; David B Karpf; Fran Harris; Harry K Genant; Kristine Ensrud; Andrea Z LaCroix; Dennis M Black
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Severity of prevalent vertebral fractures and the risk of subsequent vertebral and nonvertebral fractures: results from the MORE trial.

Authors:  P D Delmas; H K Genant; G G Crans; J L Stock; M Wong; E Siris; J D Adachi
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  The effects of parathyroid hormone and alendronate alone or in combination in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  Dennis M Black; Susan L Greenspan; Kristine E Ensrud; Lisa Palermo; Joan A McGowan; Thomas F Lang; Patrick Garnero; Mary L Bouxsein; John P Bilezikian; Clifford J Rosen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-09-20       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Discordance in patient classification using T-scores.

Authors:  K G Faulkner; E von Stetten; P Miller
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  29 in total

1.  A poisson process model for hip fracture risk.

Authors:  Zvi Schechner; Gangming Luo; Jonathan J Kaufman; Robert S Siffert
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Teriparatide increases strength of the peripheral skeleton in premenopausal women with idiopathic osteoporosis: a pilot HR-pQCT study.

Authors:  Kyle K Nishiyama; Adi Cohen; Polly Young; Ji Wang; Joan M Lappe; X Edward Guo; David W Dempster; Robert R Recker; Elizabeth Shane
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Can Hip Fracture Prediction in Women be Estimated beyond Bone Mineral Density Measurement Alone?

Authors:  Piet Geusens; Tineke van Geel; Joop van den Bergh
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.346

Review 4.  Prophylactic augmentation of the osteoporotic proximal femur-mission impossible?

Authors:  Peter Varga; Ladina Hofmann-Fliri; Michael Blauth; Markus Windolf
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2016-12-07

5.  The Association Between BMI and QCT-Derived Proximal Hip Structure and Strength in Older Men: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Jian Shen; Carrie M Nielson; Lynn M Marshall; David C Lee; Tony M Keaveny; Eric S Orwoll
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Vertebral fragility and structural redundancy.

Authors:  Aaron J Fields; Shashank Nawathe; Senthil K Eswaran; Michael G Jekir; Mark F Adams; Panayiotis Papadopoulos; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Bone and Mineral Metabolism: Where Are We, Where Are We Going, and How Will We Get There?

Authors:  Henry M Kronenberg
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Differences in bone quality and strength between Asian and Caucasian young men.

Authors:  A L Kepley; K K Nishiyama; B Zhou; J Wang; C Zhang; D J McMahon; K F Foley; M D Walker; X Edward Guo; E Shane; T L Nickolas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  The factor-of-risk biomechanical approach predicts hip fracture in men and women: the Framingham Study.

Authors:  A B Dufour; B Roberts; K E Broe; D P Kiel; M L Bouxsein; M T Hannan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  The use of bone mineral density measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and peripheral quantitative computed microtomography in chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Martin Jannot; Fabrice Mac-Way; Vanessa Lapierre; Marie-Helene Lafage-Proust
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.902

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.