Literature DB >> 18408947

Transcription-dependent spatial arrangements of CFTR and conserved adjacent loci are not conserved in human and murine nuclei.

Nicolas Sadoni1, Bianca-Sabrina Targosz, Andreas Englmann, Stephanie Fesser, Jeannette Koch, Dirk Schindelhauer, Daniele Zink.   

Abstract

The human genes CFTR, ASZ1/GASZ, and CTTNBP2/CORTBP2 map to adjacent loci on chromosome 7q31 and display characteristic patterns of nuclear positioning, which strictly correlate with the state of activity. To address the evolutionary conservation of gene positioning, we investigated transcriptional activity and nuclear positioning of the highly conserved murine orthologs and of additional murine genes mapping to the region of conserved synteny on mouse chromosome 6. The results showed that all murine loci investigated constitutively localized in the nuclear interior irrespective of their functional state. Silenced loci did not display preferential association with the nuclear periphery or with chromocenters, respectively, and no differential positioning with respect to the chromosome 6 territory could be observed. This positional behavior of the murine loci was in striking contrast to the positioning of the human orthologs, and the results show that the transcription-dependent positioning of CFTR and adjacent loci has not been conserved. The findings reveal that the nuclear organization of conserved chromosomal regions can change rapidly during evolution and is not always as highly conserved as other features of chromosome organization. Furthermore, the results suggest that the way how nuclear positioning contributes to the regulation of conserved loci can be different in different vertebrate species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18408947     DOI: 10.1007/s00412-008-0157-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  67 in total

Review 1.  Positions of potential: nuclear organization and gene expression.

Authors:  S M Gasser
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2001-03-09       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Arrangements of macro- and microchromosomes in chicken cells.

Authors:  F A Habermann; M Cremer; J Walter; G Kreth; J von Hase; K Bauer; J Wienberg; C Cremer; T Cremer; I Solovei
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Nonequivalent nuclear location of immunoglobulin alleles in B lymphocytes.

Authors:  J A Skok; K E Brown; V Azuara; M L Caparros; J Baxter; K Takacs; N Dillon; D Gray; R P Perry; M Merkenschlager; A G Fisher
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 25.606

4.  Subnuclear compartmentalization of immunoglobulin loci during lymphocyte development.

Authors:  Steven T Kosak; Jane A Skok; Kay L Medina; Roy Riblet; Michelle M Le Beau; Amanda G Fisher; Harinder Singh
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-04-05       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR: general amplification of target DNA by a single degenerate primer.

Authors:  H Telenius; N P Carter; C E Bebb; M Nordenskjöld; B A Ponder; A Tunnacliffe
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.736

6.  The replication timing of CFTR and adjacent genes.

Authors:  Andreas Englmann; Luka A Clarke; Susanne Christan; Margarida D Amaral; Dirk Schindelhauer; Daniele Zink
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  A forkhead-domain gene is mutated in a severe speech and language disorder.

Authors:  C S Lai; S E Fisher; J A Hurst; F Vargha-Khadem; A P Monaco
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-10-04       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Chromatin decondensation and nuclear reorganization of the HoxB locus upon induction of transcription.

Authors:  Séverine Chambeyron; Wendy A Bickmore
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Neural induction promotes large-scale chromatin reorganisation of the Mash1 locus.

Authors:  Ruth R E Williams; Véronique Azuara; Pascale Perry; Stephan Sauer; Maria Dvorkina; Helle Jørgensen; Jeffery Roix; Philip McQueen; Tom Misteli; Matthias Merkenschlager; Amanda G Fisher
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 5.285

10.  Common themes and cell type specific variations of higher order chromatin arrangements in the mouse.

Authors:  Robert Mayer; Alessandro Brero; Johann von Hase; Timm Schroeder; Thomas Cremer; Steffen Dietzel
Journal:  BMC Cell Biol       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 4.241

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Gene positioning.

Authors:  Carmelo Ferrai; Inês Jesus de Castro; Liron Lavitas; Mita Chotalia; Ana Pombo
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  The spatial repositioning of adipogenesis genes is correlated with their expression status in a porcine mesenchymal stem cell adipogenesis model system.

Authors:  Izabela Szczerbal; Helen A Foster; Joanna M Bridger
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Transcriptomic and nuclear architecture of immune cells after LPS activation.

Authors:  Romain Solinhac; Florence Mompart; Pascal Martin; David Robelin; Philippe Pinton; Eddie Iannuccelli; Yvette Lahbib-Mansais; Isabelle P Oswald; Martine Yerle-Bouissou
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  The radial nuclear positioning of genes correlates with features of megabase-sized chromatin domains.

Authors:  Alexandra C Kölbl; Daniela Weigl; Medhanie Mulaw; Tobias Thormeyer; Stefan K Bohlander; Thomas Cremer; Steffen Dietzel
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  Positioning of human chromosomes in murine cell hybrids according to synteny.

Authors:  Karen J Meaburn; Robert F Newbold; Joanna M Bridger
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  Mapping of lamin A- and progerin-interacting genome regions.

Authors:  Nard Kubben; Michiel Adriaens; Wouter Meuleman; Jan Willem Voncken; Bas van Steensel; Tom Misteli
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 7.  The interdependence of gene-regulatory elements and the 3D genome.

Authors:  Marit W Vermunt; Di Zhang; Gerd A Blobel
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Gene repositioning within the cell nucleus is not random and is determined by its genomic neighborhood.

Authors:  K Laurence Jost; Bianca Bertulat; Alexander Rapp; Alessandro Brero; Tanja Hardt; Petra Domaing; Claudia Gösele; Herbert Schulz; Norbert Hübner; M Cristina Cardoso
Journal:  Epigenetics Chromatin       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 4.954

9.  Dynamic trans interactions in yeast chromosomes.

Authors:  Ekaterina V Mirkin; Frederick S Chang; Nancy Kleckner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.