Literature DB >> 19585140

The spatial repositioning of adipogenesis genes is correlated with their expression status in a porcine mesenchymal stem cell adipogenesis model system.

Izabela Szczerbal1, Helen A Foster, Joanna M Bridger.   

Abstract

Alterations in the nuclear positioning of chromosomes and specific genes during differentiation and development have suggested strongly the existence of a relationship between non-random organization of the genome and its function. In this study, we have examined the genome organization in interphase nuclei during adipogenesis, using the pig as a model organism. We hypothesized that changes in the gene expression profile and chromatin remodeling which occur during cellular differentiation would elicit repositioning of whole chromosomes, moving specific genes on them to different regions of the nucleus. We established an in vitro adipogenesis differentiation system using mesenchymal stem cells, derived from porcine bone marrow. The nuclear position of seven adipogenesis genes (PPARG, SREBF1, FABP4, CEBPA, CEBPB, CREB, and GATA2), two control genes (SOX9 and MYL1), and six chromosomes carrying these gene loci (SSC4, SSC6, SSC12, SSC13, SSC15, and SSC17) was determined. We found that during adipogenesis, using the in vitro stem cell model system, in contrast to our original hypothesis, the nuclear position of genes involved in adipogenesis was altered radically with the up-regulation of gene expression correlating with these genes becoming more internally located within nuclei. Chromosome territories, containing these genes, were also found to alter their nuclear position during the in vitro adipogenesis model, with the most dramatic repositioning being SSC4 that moved from the nuclear periphery towards the nuclear interior. We found that during in vitro adipogenesis chromosome territories decondensed and the genes were found on loops and projections of chromatin, away from the main body of the chromosomes. From our data, it appears that the temporal repositioning of genes, emanating away from chromosomes, during adipogenesis is correlated with gene activity, supporting models of the involvement of spatial genome repositioning in regulating gene expression and the nuclear interior being an important region of the nucleus for transcription.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19585140     DOI: 10.1007/s00412-009-0225-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  70 in total

1.  Arrangements of macro- and microchromosomes in chicken cells.

Authors:  F A Habermann; M Cremer; J Walter; G Kreth; J von Hase; K Bauer; J Wienberg; C Cremer; T Cremer; I Solovei
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Subnuclear compartmentalization of immunoglobulin loci during lymphocyte development.

Authors:  Steven T Kosak; Jane A Skok; Kay L Medina; Roy Riblet; Michelle M Le Beau; Amanda G Fisher; Harinder Singh
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-04-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Chromosome territories--a functional nuclear landscape.

Authors:  Thomas Cremer; Marion Cremer; Steffen Dietzel; Stefan Müller; Irina Solovei; Stanislav Fakan
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 8.382

4.  Cell biology: chromosome territories.

Authors:  Karen J Meaburn; Tom Misteli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  The role of specialized transcription factories in chromosome pairing.

Authors:  Meng Xu; Peter R Cook
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2008-07-28

6.  Swine in biomedical research: creating the building blocks of animal models.

Authors:  Lawrence Schook; Craig Beattie; Jonathan Beever; Sharon Donovan; Russell Jamison; Federico Zuckermann; Steven Niemi; Max Rothschild; Mark Rutherford; Douglas Smith
Journal:  Anim Biotechnol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.282

7.  Allele-specific nuclear positioning of the monoallelically expressed astrocyte marker GFAP.

Authors:  Takumi Takizawa; Prabhakar R Gudla; Liying Guo; Stephan Lockett; Tom Misteli
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Chromatin decondensation and nuclear reorganization of the HoxB locus upon induction of transcription.

Authors:  Séverine Chambeyron; Wendy A Bickmore
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Cytogenetic mapping of DGAT1, PPARA, ADIPOR1 and CREB genes in the pig.

Authors:  Izabela Szczerbal; Li Lin; Monika Stachowiak; Agata Chmurzynska; Mariusz Mackowski; Andreas Winter; Krzysztof Flisikowski; Ruedi Fries; Marek Switonski
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.653

10.  Recruitment to the nuclear periphery can alter expression of genes in human cells.

Authors:  Lee E Finlan; Duncan Sproul; Inga Thomson; Shelagh Boyle; Elizabeth Kerr; Paul Perry; Bauke Ylstra; Jonathan R Chubb; Wendy A Bickmore
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  53 in total

1.  Genetics of fat tissue accumulation in pigs: a comparative approach.

Authors:  M Switonski; M Stachowiak; J Cieslak; M Bartz; M Grzes
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  The nuclear envelope as a chromatin organizer.

Authors:  Nikolaj Zuleger; Michael I Robson; Eric C Schirmer
Journal:  Nucleus       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 4.197

Review 3.  A chromatin perspective of adipogenesis.

Authors:  Melina M Musri; Ramon Gomis; Marcelina Párrizas
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  Association of adipogenic genes with SC-35 domains during porcine adipogenesis.

Authors:  Izabela Szczerbal; Joanna M Bridger
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  Gene expression, chromosome position and lamin A/C mutations.

Authors:  Megan J Puckelwartz; Frederic Fs Depreux; Elizabeth M McNally
Journal:  Nucleus       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.197

6.  Transcriptomic and nuclear architecture of immune cells after LPS activation.

Authors:  Romain Solinhac; Florence Mompart; Pascal Martin; David Robelin; Philippe Pinton; Eddie Iannuccelli; Yvette Lahbib-Mansais; Isabelle P Oswald; Martine Yerle-Bouissou
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Gene regulation through dynamic actin control of nuclear structure.

Authors:  Jeyantt Sankaran; Gunes Uzer; Andre J van Wijnen; Janet Rubin
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2019-05-13

8.  Genomic properties of chromosomal bands are linked to evolutionary rearrangements and new centromere formation in primates.

Authors:  Concetta Federico; Anna Maria Pappalardo; Venera Ferrito; Sabrina Tosi; Salvatore Saccone
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 5.239

9.  Genome architecture and the role of transcription.

Authors:  Argyris Papantonis; Peter R Cook
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 8.382

10.  Rapid chromosome territory relocation by nuclear motor activity in response to serum removal in primary human fibroblasts.

Authors:  Ishita S Mehta; Manelle Amira; Amanda J Harvey; Joanna M Bridger
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 13.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.