Literature DB >> 27468199

Preoperative defining system for pancreatic head cancer considering surgical resection.

Seok Jeong Yang1, Ho Kyoung Hwang1, Chang Moo Kang1, Woo Jung Lee1.   

Abstract

AIM: To provide appropriate treatment, it is crucial to share the clinical status of pancreas head cancer among multidisciplinary treatment members.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the medical records of 113 patients who underwent surgery for pancreas head cancer from January 2008 to December 2012 was performed. We developed preoperative defining system of pancreatic head cancer by describing "resectability - tumor location - vascular relationship - adjacent organ involvement - preoperative CA19-9 (initial bilirubin level) - vascular anomaly". The oncologic correlations with this reporting system were evaluated.
RESULTS: Among 113 patients, there were 75 patients (66.4%) with resectable, 34 patients (30.1%) with borderline resectable, and 4 patients (3.5%) with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Mean disease-free survival was 24.8 mo (95%CI: 19.6-30.1) with a 5-year disease-free survival rate of 13.5%. Pretreatment tumor size ≥ 2.4 cm [Exp(B) = 3.608, 95%CI: 1.512-8.609, P = 0.044] and radiologic vascular invasion [Exp(B) = 5.553, 95%CI: 2.269-14.589, P = 0.002] were independent predictive factors for neoadjuvant treatment. Borderline resectability [Exp(B) = 0.222, P = 0.008], pancreatic head cancer involving the pancreatic neck [Exp(B) = 9.461, P = 0.001] and arterial invasion [Exp(B) = 6.208, P = 0.010], and adjusted CA19-9 ≥ 50 [Exp(B) = 1.972 P = 0.019] were identified as prognostic clinical factors to predict tumor recurrence.
CONCLUSION: The suggested preoperative defining system can help with designing treatment plans and also predict oncologic outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjusted CA19-9; Borderline resectable; Neoadjuvant therapy; Pancreas head cancer; Preoperative defining system

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27468199      PMCID: PMC4948265          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i26.6076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  21 in total

1.  Comparison of CT and MRI for presurgical characterization of paraaortic lymph nodes in patients with pancreatico-biliary carcinoma.

Authors:  Young-Chul Kim; Mi-Suk Park; Seung-Whan Cha; Yong-Eun Chung; Joon-Suk Lim; Kyung-Sik Kim; Myeong-Jin Kim; Ki-Whang Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma radiology reporting template: consensus statement of the society of abdominal radiology and the american pancreatic association.

Authors:  Mahmoud M Al-Hawary; Isaac R Francis; Suresh T Chari; Elliot K Fishman; David M Hough; David S Lu; Michael Macari; Alec J Megibow; Frank H Miller; Koenraad J Mortele; Nipun B Merchant; Rebecca M Minter; Eric P Tamm; Dushyant V Sahani; Diane M Simeone
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy in radical pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: long-term results of a Japanese multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yuji Nimura; Masato Nagino; Sonshin Takao; Tadahiro Takada; Koji Miyazaki; Yoshifumi Kawarada; Shuichi Miyagawa; Akihiro Yamaguchi; Shuichi Ishiyama; Yutaka Takeda; Kourou Sakoda; Taira Kinoshita; Kenzo Yasui; Hiroshi Shimada; Hiroyuki Katoh
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 7.027

4.  A prospective randomized controlled study comparing outcomes of standard resection and extended resection, including dissection of the nerve plexus and various lymph nodes, in patients with pancreatic head cancer.

Authors:  Jin-Young Jang; Mee Joo Kang; Jin Seok Heo; Seong Ho Choi; Dong Wook Choi; Sang Jae Park; Sung-Sik Han; Dong Sup Yoon; Hee Chul Yu; Koo Jeong Kang; Sang Geol Kim; Sun-Whe Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: patterns of spread, the importance of hepatic resection for curative operation, and a presurgical clinical staging system.

Authors:  E C Burke; W R Jarnagin; S N Hochwald; P W Pisters; Y Fong; L H Blumgart
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  M Wagner; C Redaelli; M Lietz; C A Seiler; H Friess; M W Büchler
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  The lymph node ratio is the strongest prognostic factor after resection of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Hartwig Riediger; Tobias Keck; Ulrich Wellner; Axel zur Hausen; Ulrich Adam; Ulrich T Hopt; Frank Makowiec
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Perineural invasion of carcinoma of the pancreas and biliary tract.

Authors:  T Nagakawa; K Mori; T Nakano; M Kadoya; H Kobayashi; T Akiyama; M Kayahara; T Ohta; K Ueno; Y Higashino
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Pylorus-resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy offers long-term outcomes similar to those of pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective study.

Authors:  Manabu Kawai; Masaji Tani; Seiko Hirono; Ken-Ichi Okada; Motoki Miyazawa; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  A modified Jarnagin-Blumgart classification better predicts survival for resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Guoping Ding; Yifei Yang; Liping Cao; Wenchao Chen; Zhengrong Wu; Guixing Jiang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.