Literature DB >> 24426751

Minimally invasive esophagectomy in the elderly.

Shailesh Puntambekar1, Rahul Kenawadekar1, Archit Pandit1, Akshay Nadkarni1, Saurabh Joshi1, Geetanjali Agarwal1, Nasir Ahmad Bhat1, Jainul Malik1, Sunil Reddy1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database to evaluate our experience in elderly patients (>70 years) undergoing Thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy for cancer oesophagus. To ascertain whether age, is a limiting factor for patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy.
METHODS: All Patients above 70 years of age, referred to the Gastro-esophageal clinic were included in the study. Tumours were staged as per AJCC 6th ed. 2002. Patients diagnosed with T1/2/3, N0/1 lesion of the mid/lower oesophagus (Infra Azygous) and type I and II Gastro esophageal junction tumours were included in the study. Patients with ASA grade IV were excluded. All patients who underwent Thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy from January 2009 till January 2012 were evaluated for their perioperative outcomes.
RESULTS: Sixty eight patients underwent Minimal Invasive esophagectomy from January 2009 to January 2012. There were 45 males and 23 females. The average age in elderly group was 75.76 ± 5.96 years (range 70 to 91). Mean operative time was 178.84 ± 65.26 min, mean blood loss 143.84 ml(range 32-450 ml), mean ICU stay 3.84 days(range 2-11 days) and mean hospital stay was 12.76 days(range 8-21 days). Pneumonia and Cardiac related complications occurred in 10.30 % and 1.47 % patients respectively. None of the procedures required conversion to open thoracotomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy is feasible and surgically safe in elderly patients with low morbidity and mortality. Thus age of a patient should not be considered a limiting factor. ULTRAMINI ABSTRACT: This is an original article about our experience of thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy for cancer esophagus in elderly patients. After analyzing the data we feel that age of the patient cannot be a truly limiting factor for patient diagnosed of esophageal cancer to undergo minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elderly; Esopphageal cancer; Laparoscopy; Minimal invasive esophagectomy; Thoracosopy

Year:  2013        PMID: 24426751      PMCID: PMC3890021          DOI: 10.1007/s13193-013-0263-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0975-7651


  37 in total

1.  Outcomes after esophagectomy: a ten-year prospective cohort.

Authors:  Stephen H Bailey; David A Bull; David H Harpole; Jeffrey J Rentz; Leigh A Neumayer; Theodore N Pappas; Jennifer Daley; William G Henderson; Barbara Krasnicka; Shukri F Khuri
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 2.  Systematic review of minimally invasive resection for gastro-oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  E H Gemmill; P McCulloch
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus in the elderly: results of current surgical management.

Authors:  R T Poon; S Y Law; K M Chu; F J Branicki; J Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Oesophagectomy by a transhiatal approach or thoracotomy: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  M Goldminc; G Maddern; E Le Prise; B Meunier; J P Campion; B Launois
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Predictors of operative death after oesophagectomy for carcinoma.

Authors:  H Abunasra; S Lewis; L Beggs; J Duffy; D Beggs; E Morgan
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Thoracolaparoscopy in the lateral position for esophageal cancer: the experience of a single institution with 112 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Shailesh P Puntambekar; Geetanjali A Agarwal; Saurabh N Joshi; Neeraj V Rayate; Ravindra M Sathe; Anjali M Patil
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy.

Authors:  N T Nguyen; D M Follette; B M Wolfe; P D Schneider; P Roberts; J E Goodnight
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2000-08

8.  Three-field lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction in 174 R0 resections: impact on staging, disease-free survival, and outcome: a plea for adaptation of TNM classification in upper-half esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  T Lerut; P Nafteux; J Moons; W Coosemans; G Decker; P De Leyn; D Van Raemdonck; N Ectors
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Results of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in elderly patients: age has little influence on outcome and survival.

Authors:  Alberto Ruol; Giuseppe Portale; Giovanni Zaninotto; Matteo Cagol; Francesco Cavallin; Carlo Castoro; Vanna Chiarion Sileni; Rita Alfieri; Sabrina Rampado; Ermanno Ancona
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Prognostic impact of postoperative radiation in patients undergoing radical esophagectomy for pathologic lymph node positive esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Yaping Xu; Jinshi Liu; Xianghui Du; Xiaojiang Sun; Yuanda Zheng; Jianxiang Chen; Bo Li; Wei Liu; Hao Jiang; Weimin Mao
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.481

View more
  1 in total

1.  Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Semi-Prone Position (Pawar Technique): Technical Aspects and Outcome in 224 Patients.

Authors:  Suraj B Pawar; Kiran G Bagul; Yogesh S Anap; Prasad K Tanawade; Ashwini Mane; Snehdeep S Patil; Reshma S Pawar; Shubham S Kulkarni; Aditya S Pawar
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2021-06-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.