Literature DB >> 18406931

Variation and control of process behavior.

Todd Pawlicki1, Matthew Whitaker.   

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to highlight the importance of controlling process variability for successful quality assurance (QA). We describe the method of statistical process control for characterizing and controlling a process. Traditionally, QA has been performed by comparing some important measurement (e.g., linear accelerator output) against a corresponding specification. Although useful in determining the fitness of a particular measurement, this approach does not provide information about the underlying process behavior over time. A modern view of QA is to consider the time-ordered behavior of a process. Every process displays characteristic behaviors that are independent of the specifications imposed on it. The goal of modern QA is, not only to ensure that a process is on-target, but that it is also operating with minimal variation. This is accomplished by way of a data-driven approach using process behavior charts. The development of process behavior charts, historically known as control charts, and process behavior (action) limits are described. The effect these concepts have on quality management is also discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18406931     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.05.096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  7 in total

1.  Standardizing naming conventions in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Lakshmi Santanam; Coen Hurkmans; Sasa Mutic; Corine van Vliet-Vroegindeweij; Scott Brame; William Straube; James Galvin; Prabhakar Tripuraneni; Jeff Michalski; Walter Bosch
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  A Risk-Adjusted Control Chart to Evaluate Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Plan Quality.

Authors:  Arkajyoti Roy; Dan Cutright; Mahesh Gopalakrishnan; Arthur B Yeh; Bharat B Mittal
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-12-04

3.  Retrospective study on performance of constancy check device in Linac beam monitoring using Statistical Process Control.

Authors:  Bipasha Pal; Angshuman Pal; Suresh Das; Soura Palit; Papai Sarkar; Subhayan Mondal; Suman Mallik; Jyotirup Goswami; Sayan Das; Arijit Sen; Monidipa Mondol
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2019-12-10

4.  Production, review, and impact of technical quality control guidelines in a national context.

Authors:  Michelle K Nielsen; Kyle E Malkoske; Erika Brown; Kevin Diamond; Normand Frenière; John Grant; Natalie Pomerleau-Dalcourt; Jason Schella; L John Schreiner; Laurent Tantôt; J Eduardo Villareal-Barajas; Jean-Pierre Bissonnette
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Evaluation of Elekta Agility multi-leaf collimator performance using statistical process control tools.

Authors:  Sandra M Meyers; Michael J Balderson; Daniel Létourneau
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Retrospective analysis of linear accelerator output constancy checks using process control techniques.

Authors:  Taweap Sanghangthum; Sivalee Suriyapee; Somyot Srisatit; Todd Pawlicki
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Guidelines for treatment naming in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Travis R Denton; Lisa B E Shields; Michael Hahl; Casey Maudlin; Mark Bassett; Aaron C Spalding
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.