Literature DB >> 18404931

The effective point of measurement of ionization chambers and the build-up anomaly in MV x-ray beams.

M R McEwen1, I Kawrakow, C K Ross.   

Abstract

A precision experimental investigation of the effective point of measurement (EPOM) of ion chambers in megavoltage beams has been carried out. A one-dimensional scanning phantom system was developed with an overall accuracy in the positioning of a chamber of better than 0.15 mm. Depth-dose data were acquired for a 25 MV beam from an Elekta Precise linac (field sizes of 10 x 10 cm and 25 x 25 cm) for measurement depths in the range 0.6-6 cm. The results confirmed the Monte Carlo calculations of an earlier theoretical investigation by Kawrakow [Med. Phys. 33, 1829-1839 (2006)] that the standard shift for cylindrical chambers, recommended in dosimetry protocols of -0.6r (where r is the internal radius of the cavity), is incorrect. A wide range of ion chambers were investigated and it was found that errors of up to 1.4 mm could occur for certain chamber designs (although typical errors for common chambers were around 0.5 mm). A comparison between measurements and Monte Carlo simulations showed that once the correct EPOM is used, the details of the linac geometry are correct, and the parameters of the electron beam striking the bremsstrahlung target have been adequately determined, the EGSnrc Monte Carlo package is capable of reproducing the experimental data to 0.2 mm or better. The investigation also confirmed that for the highest accuracy depth-dose curves in megavoltage photon beams one should use a well-guarded parallel-plate ion chamber. Three chamber designs were tested here and found to be satisfactory-the Scanditronix-Wellhöfer NACP-02, PTW Roos and Exradin All.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18404931     DOI: 10.1118/1.2839329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  9 in total

1.  Extraction of depth-dependent perturbation factors for parallel-plate chambers in electron beams using a plastic scintillation detector.

Authors:  Frédéric Lacroix; Mathieu Guillot; Malcolm McEwen; Claudiu Cojocaru; Luc Gingras; A Sam Beddar; Luc Beaulieu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Determination of electron energy, spectral width, and beam divergence at the exit window for clinical megavoltage x-ray beams.

Authors:  D L Sawkey; B A Faddegon
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Simulation of large x-ray fields using independently measured source and geometry details.

Authors:  D Sawkey; B A Faddegon
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Addendum to the AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon beams.

Authors:  Malcolm McEwen; Larry DeWerd; Geoffrey Ibbott; David Followill; David W O Rogers; Stephen Seltzer; Jan Seuntjens
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  A method to improve accuracy and precision of water surface identification for photon depth dose measurements.

Authors:  J D Ververs; M J Schaefer; I Kawrakow; J V Siebers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Uncertainty in positioning ion chamber at reference depth for various water phantoms.

Authors:  Naoki Kinoshita; Hiroshi Oguchi; Toshiki Adachi; Hiroki Shioura; Hirohiko Kimura
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-03-30

7.  A study of surface dosimetry for breast cancer radiotherapy treatments using Gafchromic EBT2 film.

Authors:  Masahiro Nakano; Robin F Hill; May Whitaker; Jung-Ha Kim; Zdenka Kuncic
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Surface dose variations in 6 and 10 MV flattened and flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beams.

Authors:  Jason Cashmore
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Electrometer offset current due to scattered radiation.

Authors:  Sonja Wegener; Otto A Sauer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 2.102

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.