Literature DB >> 18404361

A prospective study of the effectiveness of early intervention with high-risk back-injured workers--a pilot study.

I Z Schultz1, J Crook, J Berkowitz, R Milner, G R Meloche, M L Lewis.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: It was postulated that workers, at the sub-acute stage after injury, respond differently to clinical and occupational interventions offered in a workers' compensation environment. Individual worker risk of disability, it was further believed, would influence the effectiveness of early intervention. The objective of the current pilot study was to evaluate return to work (RTW) outcomes following proactive, combined clinical, occupational and case management-based interdisciplinary early intervention, provided in a workers' compensation environment 4-10 weeks of onset of back pain, to workers with medium and high risk for disability.
METHODS: The project was a controlled study comparing conventional workers' compensation case management with integrated, interdisciplinary and multimodal early intervention (hereinafter referred to as "EI"). At baseline, risk status was determined by a validated Risk for Disability Questionnaire by Carragee et al. (Spine 5(1):24-35, 2005). Seventeen workers at high risk of protracted disability and 20 workers at moderate risk of disability received conventional case management, and 17 workers assessed at high risk of protracted disability and 18 workers at moderate risk of disability received the Early Intervention.
RESULTS: At 3 months post back pain onset, no statistically significant differences were identified in RTW outcomes between conventional case management and the Early Intervention. However, by 6 months post back pain onset, workers at high risk of work disability who received the Early Intervention were significantly more likely to RTW than high risk workers who received conventional case management. In contrast, moderate risk workers continued to exhibit no statistically significant differences in RTW outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Multimodal Early Intervention in the workers' compensation case management context is likely effective for workers with sub-acute back pain who are at high risk of occupational disability. The comprehensive Early Intervention is, however, likely redundant for workers who are not at high risk for disability and should not be applied indiscriminately. Further studies are required to determine longer-term Early Intervention outcomes, and to replicate the findings using a randomized control design. Also, with a larger sample size, it will be possible to determine predictors of occupational outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18404361     DOI: 10.1007/s10926-008-9130-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  79 in total

1.  Biopsychosocial multivariate predictive model of occupational low back disability.

Authors:  Izabela Z Schultz; Joan M Crook; Jonathan Berkowitz; Gregory R Meloche; Ruth Milner; Oonagh A Zuberbier; Wendy Meloche
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The differential role of pain, work characteristics and pain-related fear in explaining back pain and sick leave in occupational settings.

Authors:  Els L M Gheldof; Jan Vinck; Johan W S Vlaeyen; Alita Hidding; Geert Crombez
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 3.  Information and low back pain management: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yves Edgard Henrotin; Christine Cedraschi; Bernard Duplan; Thierry Bazin; Bernard Duquesnoy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  An investigation of the effects of a healthcare provider network on costs and lost time in workers' compensation.

Authors:  Edward J Bernacki; Xuguang Grant Tao; Larry Yuspeh
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.162

Review 5.  Reducing sickness absence from work due to low back pain: how well do intervention strategies match modifiable risk factors?

Authors:  William S Shaw; Steven J Linton; Glenn Pransky
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-12

Review 6.  Integrating psychosocial and behavioral interventions to achieve optimal rehabilitation outcomes.

Authors:  Michael Jl Sullivan; Michael Feuerstein; Robert Gatchel; Steven J Linton; Glenn Pransky
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-12

7.  Predictors of return to work in patients sick listed for sub-acute low back pain: a 12-month follow-up study.

Authors:  Kjersti Storheim; Jens Ivar Brox; Inger Holm; Kari Bø
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Early intervention for the management of acute low back pain: a single-blind randomized controlled trial of biopsychosocial education, manual therapy, and exercise.

Authors:  Benedict M Wand; Christien Bird; James H McAuley; Caroline J Doré; Maureen MacDowell; Lorraine H De Souza
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Treatment- and cost-effectiveness of early intervention for acute low-back pain patients: a one-year prospective study.

Authors:  Robert J Gatchel; Peter B Polatin; Carl Noe; Margaret Gardea; Carla Pulliam; Judy Thompson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2003-03

10.  The effect of graded activity on patients with subacute low back pain: a randomized prospective clinical study with an operant-conditioning behavioral approach.

Authors:  I Lindström; C Ohlund; C Eek; L Wallin; L E Peterson; W E Fordyce; A L Nachemson
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1992-04
View more
  6 in total

1.  Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non-specific low back pain: prognostic factor review.

Authors:  Jill A Hayden; Maria N Wilson; Richard D Riley; Ross Iles; Tamar Pincus; Rachel Ogilvie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-25

2.  Cost-effectiveness of a participatory return-to-work intervention for temporary agency workers and unemployed workers sick-listed due to musculoskeletal disorders: design of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sylvia J Vermeulen; Johannes R Anema; Antonius J M Schellart; Willem van Mechelen; Allard J van der Beek
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-03-28       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  The impact of psychological symptoms on return to work in workers after occupational injury.

Authors:  Kuan-Han Lin; Nai-Wen Guo; Shu-Chu Shiao; Shih-Cheng Liao; Pei-Yi Hu; Jin-Huei Hsu; Yaw-Huei Hwang; Yue Leon Guo
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-03

Review 4.  Effectiveness of community- and workplace-based interventions to manage musculoskeletal-related sickness absence and job loss: a systematic review.

Authors:  Keith T Palmer; Elizabeth C Harris; Cathy Linaker; Mary Barker; Wendy Lawrence; Cyrus Cooper; David Coggon
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 5.  Return-to-work coordination programmes for improving return to work in workers on sick leave.

Authors:  Nicole Vogel; Stefan Schandelmaier; Thomas Zumbrunn; Shanil Ebrahim; Wout El de Boer; Jason W Busse; Regina Kunz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-30

6.  Judgement analysis of case severity and future risk of disability regarding chronic low back pain by general practitioners in Ireland.

Authors:  Christopher P Dwyer; Pádraig MacNeela; Hannah Durand; Andrea Gibbons; Bronagh Reynolds; Edel Doherty; Sinéad Conneely; Brian W Slattery; Andrew W Murphy; Brian E McGuire
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.