Literature DB >> 18401619

Musculoskeletal imaging at 3 T: imaging and optimization.

James S Meyer1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2008        PMID： 18401619     DOI： 10.1007/s00247-008-0768-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN： 0301-0449


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

Review 1.  A review of MR physics: 3T versus 1.5T.

Authors:  Brian J Soher; Brian M Dale; Elmar M Merkle
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.266

Review 2.  3T MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system (Part I): considerations, coils, and challenges.

Authors:  R Richard Ramnath
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.266

Review 3.  Clinical 3T MR imaging: mastering the challenges.

Authors:  Lawrence N Tanenbaum
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.266

4.  Nonspecificity of short inversion time inversion recovery (STIR) as a technique of fat suppression: pitfalls in image interpretation.

Authors:  G Krinsky; N M Rofsky; J C Weinreb
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.959
  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  The repeatability of T2 relaxation time measurement of human knee articular cartilage.

Authors:  Ilkka Hannila; Eveliina Lammentausta; Osmo Tervonen; Miika Tapio Nieminen
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Parenchymal signal intensity in 3-T body MRI of dogs with hematopoietic neoplasia.

Authors:  Daniel A Feeney; Leslie C Sharkey; Susan M Steward; Katherine L Bahr; Michael S Henson; Daisuke Ito; Timothy D O'Brien; Carl R Jessen; Brian D Husbands; Antonella Borgatti; Jaime F Modiano
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 0.982
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.