Literature DB >> 16530631

Clinical 3T MR imaging: mastering the challenges.

Lawrence N Tanenbaum1.   

Abstract

3T MRI is ready to meet the needs of clinical practice. SAR limitations are minimized by technical advances and surface coils are available for all core applications. With appropriate adjustments to scanning protocols, one can master the challenges of scanning at 3T; studies of the brain, spine, chest, abdomen, pelvis, vasculature, and extremities can be consistently higher in quality than are those obtained at 1.5T. The superior studies that are obtainable at 3T have great appeal to clinicians who are sophisticated about MR technology in areas, such as neurology, orthopedics, vascular surgery, and oncology,and encourage a shift in referrals toward practices that invest in higher field technology. The greater sensitivity to magnetic susceptibility offers unique benefits in functional neuroimaging, and available software/hardware packages enhance clinical setting feasibility, which adds a source of new referrals. The greater overall signal of 3T can be manipulated to make scanning more comfortable and with less motion artifact because scan times could be half as long. Spectacular anatomic delineation that is provided by high-definition scanning at true 1024 resolution can improve preoperative assessment and may improve sensitivity to smaller lesions. 3T provides practices with an advantage that is sought increasingly by high field strength purchasers in a competitive market. Only cost considerations stand in the way of the eventual domination of 3T systems in the high field strength market.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16530631     DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2005.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am        ISSN: 1064-9689            Impact factor:   2.266


  25 in total

1.  High-resolution 3D-constructive interference in steady-state MR imaging and 3D time-of-flight MR angiography in neurovascular compression: a comparison between 3T and 1.5T.

Authors:  M Garcia; R Naraghi; T Zumbrunn; J Rösch; P Hastreiter; A Dörfler
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Proton MR spectroscopy of the brain at 3 T: an update.

Authors:  Alfonso Di Costanzo; Francesca Trojsi; Michela Tosetti; Timo Schirmer; Silke M Lechner; Teresa Popolizio; Tommaso Scarabino
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Advances in magnetic resonance neuroimaging.

Authors:  Michael E Moseley; Chunlei Liu; Sandra Rodriguez; Thomas Brosnan
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 4.  Musculoskeletal imaging at 3 T: imaging and optimization.

Authors:  James S Meyer
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-05

Review 5.  Molecular imaging with nanoparticles: giant roles for dwarf actors.

Authors:  Paul Debbage; Werner Jaschke
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 4.304

6.  Multi-site voxel-based morphometry: methods and a feasibility demonstration with childhood absence epilepsy.

Authors:  Heath Pardoe; Gaby S Pell; David F Abbott; Anne T Berg; Graeme D Jackson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  High resolution myocardial magnetic resonance stress perfusion imaging at 3 T using a 1 M contrast agent.

Authors:  Bernhard D Klumpp; Achim Seeger; Christina Doesch; Joerg Doering; Tobias Hoevelborn; Ulrich Kramer; Michael Fenchel; Meinrad P Gawaz; Claus D Claussen; Stephan Miller
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  MRI evaluation and safety in the developing brain.

Authors:  Shannon Tocchio; Beth Kline-Fath; Emanuel Kanal; Vincent J Schmithorst; Ashok Panigrahy
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.300

9.  Anterior cruciate ligament tibial insertion site is elliptical or triangular shaped in healthy young adults: high-resolution 3-T MRI analysis.

Authors:  Yasutaka Tashiro; Gian Andrea Lucidi; Tom Gale; Kanto Nagai; Elmar Herbst; James J Irrgang; Yasuharu Nakashima; William Anderst; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  MRI in multiple sclerosis: current status and future prospects.

Authors:  Rohit Bakshi; Alan J Thompson; Maria A Rocca; Daniel Pelletier; Vincent Dousset; Frederik Barkhof; Matilde Inglese; Charles R G Guttmann; Mark A Horsfield; Massimo Filippi
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 44.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.