Literature DB >> 18400950

Diffusion of the second messengers in the cytoplasm acts as a variability suppressor of the single photon response in vertebrate phototransduction.

Paolo Bisegna1, Giovanni Caruso, Daniele Andreucci, Lixin Shen, Vsevolod V Gurevich, Heidi E Hamm, Emmanuele DiBenedetto.   

Abstract

The single photon response in vertebrate phototransduction is highly reproducible despite a number of random components of the activation cascade, including the random activation site, the random walk of an activated receptor, and its quenching in a random number of steps. Here we use a previously generated and tested spatiotemporal mathematical and computational model to identify possible mechanisms of variability reduction. The model permits one to separate the process into modules, and to analyze their impact separately. We show that the activation cascade is responsible for generation of variability, whereas diffusion of the second messengers is responsible for its suppression. Randomness of the activation site contributes at early times to the coefficient of variation of the photoresponse, whereas the Brownian path of a photoisomerized rhodopsin (Rh*) has a negligible effect. The major driver of variability is the turnoff mechanism of Rh*, which occurs essentially within the first 2-4 phosphorylated states of Rh*. Theoretically increasing the number of steps to quenching does not significantly decrease the corresponding coefficient of variation of the effector, in agreement with the biochemical limitations on the phosphorylated states of the receptor. Diffusion of the second messengers in the cytosol acts as a suppressor of the variability generated by the activation cascade. Calcium feedback has a negligible regulatory effect on the photocurrent variability. A comparative variability analysis has been conducted for the phototransduction in mouse and salamander, including a study of the effects of their anatomical differences such as incisures and photoreceptors geometry on variability generation and suppression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18400950      PMCID: PMC2292384          DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.114058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  97 in total

1.  Variability in the time course of single photon responses from toad rods: termination of rhodopsin's activity.

Authors:  G G Whitlock; T D Lamb
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Unidirectional Na+, Ca2+, and K+ fluxes through the bovine rod outer segment Na-Ca-K exchanger.

Authors:  P P Schnetkamp; R T Szerencsei; D K Basu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1991-01-05       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Kinetic studies suggest that light-activated cyclic GMP phosphodiesterase is a complex with G-protein subunits.

Authors:  A Sitaramayya; J Harkness; J H Parkes; C Gonzalez-Oliva; P A Liebman
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1986-02-11       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Phosphodiesterase activation by photoexcited rhodopsin is quenched when rhodopsin is phosphorylated and binds the intrinsic 48-kDa protein of rod outer segments.

Authors:  U Wilden; S W Hall; H Kühn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Rhodopsin's carboxyl-terminal threonines are required for wild-type arrestin-mediated quench of transducin activation in vitro.

Authors:  M T Brannock; K Weng; P R Robinson
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1999-03-23       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Cone lamellae and red and green rod outer segment disks contain a large intrinsic membrane protein on their margins: an ultrastructural immunocytochemical study of frog retinas.

Authors:  D S Papermaster; P Reilly; B G Schneider
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Rods and cones in the mouse retina. I. Structural analysis using light and electron microscopy.

Authors:  L D Carter-Dawson; M M LaVail
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1979-11-15       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  Slowed recovery of rod photoresponse in mice lacking the GTPase accelerating protein RGS9-1.

Authors:  C K Chen; M E Burns; W He; T G Wensel; D A Baylor; M I Simon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-03       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Role for the target enzyme in deactivation of photoreceptor G protein in vivo.

Authors:  S H Tsang; M E Burns; P D Calvert; P Gouras; D A Baylor; S P Goff; V Y Arshavsky
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-10-02       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  The kinetics of inactivation of the rod phototransduction cascade with constant Ca2+i.

Authors:  A Lyubarsky; S Nikonov; E N Pugh
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  Lessons from photoreceptors: turning off g-protein signaling in living cells.

Authors:  Marie E Burns; Edward N Pugh
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2010-04

2.  Arrestin-1 expression level in rods: balancing functional performance and photoreceptor health.

Authors:  X Song; S A Vishnivetskiy; J Seo; J Chen; E V Gurevich; V V Gurevich
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Robust self-association is a common feature of mammalian visual arrestin-1.

Authors:  Miyeon Kim; Susan M Hanson; Sergey A Vishnivetskiy; Xiufeng Song; Whitney M Cleghorn; Wayne L Hubbell; Vsevolod V Gurevich
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Overexpression of rhodopsin alters the structure and photoresponse of rod photoreceptors.

Authors:  Xiao-Hong Wen; Lixin Shen; Richard S Brush; Norman Michaud; Muayyad R Al-Ubaidi; Vsevolod V Gurevich; Heidi E Hamm; Janis Lem; Emmanuele Dibenedetto; Robert E Anderson; Clint L Makino
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  ERG signal analysis using wavelet transform.

Authors:  R Barraco; D Persano Adorno; M Brai
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 1.919

6.  Identification of key factors that reduce the variability of the single photon response.

Authors:  Giovanni Caruso; Paolo Bisegna; Daniele Andreucci; Leonardo Lenoci; Vsevolod V Gurevich; Heidi E Hamm; Emmanuele DiBenedetto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  G protein-coupled receptor kinases: more than just kinases and not only for GPCRs.

Authors:  Eugenia V Gurevich; John J G Tesmer; Arcady Mushegian; Vsevolod V Gurevich
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 12.310

8.  The phototransduction machinery in the rod outer segment has a strong efficacy gradient.

Authors:  Monica Mazzolini; Giuseppe Facchetti; Laura Andolfi; Remo Proietti Zaccaria; Salvatore Tuccio; Johannes Treu; Claudio Altafini; Enzo M Di Fabrizio; Marco Lazzarino; Gert Rapp; Vincent Torre
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Will the rod bend or break? Analyzing the structural resilience of cellular organelles.

Authors:  Yiannis Koutalos
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Dynamics of mouse rod phototransduction and its sensitivity to variation of key parameters.

Authors:  L Shen; G Caruso; P Bisegna; D Andreucci; V V Gurevich; H E Hamm; E DiBenedetto
Journal:  IET Syst Biol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.