Literature DB >> 20001089

Dynamics of mouse rod phototransduction and its sensitivity to variation of key parameters.

L Shen1, G Caruso, P Bisegna, D Andreucci, V V Gurevich, H E Hamm, E DiBenedetto.   

Abstract

The deep understanding of the biochemical and biophysical basis of visual transduction, makes it ideal for systems-level analysis. A sensitivity analysis is presented for a self-consistent set of parameters involved in mouse phototransduction. The organising framework is a spatio-temporal mathematical model, which includes the geometry of the rod outer segment (ROS), the layered array of the discs, the incisures, the biochemistry of the activation/deactivation cascade and the biophysics of the diffusion of the second messengers in the cytoplasm and the closing of the cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) gated cationic channels. These modules include essentially all the relevant geometrical, biochemical and biophysical parameters. The parameters are selected from within experimental ranges, to obey basic first principles such as conservation of mass and energy fluxes. By means of the model they are compared to a large set of experimental data, providing a strikingly close match. Following isomerisation of a single rhodopsin R * (single photon response), the sensitivity analysis was carried out on the photo-response, measured both in terms of number of effector molecules produced, and photocurrent suppression, at peak time and the activation and recovery phases of the cascade. The current suppression is found to be very sensitive to variations of the catalytic activities, Hill's coefficients and hydrolysis rates and the geometry of the ROS, including size and shape of the incisures. The activated effector phosphodiesterase (PDE *) is very sensitive to variations of catalytic activity of G-protein activation and the average lifetimes of activated rhodopsin R * and PDE *; however, they are insensitive to geometry and variations of the transduction parameters. Thus the system is separated into two functional modules, activation/deactivation and transduction, each confined in different geometrical domains, communicating through the hydrolysis of cGMP by PDE *, and each sensitive to variations of parameters only in its own module.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20001089      PMCID: PMC3833298          DOI: 10.1049/iet-syb.2008.0154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IET Syst Biol        ISSN: 1751-8849            Impact factor:   1.615


  91 in total

1.  Microtubules in a rod-specific cytoskeleton associated with outer segment incisures.

Authors:  M S Eckmiller
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.241

2.  The gain of rod phototransduction: reconciliation of biochemical and electrophysiological measurements.

Authors:  I B Leskov; V A Klenchin; J W Handy; G G Whitlock; V I Govardovskii; M D Bownds; T D Lamb; E N Pugh; V Y Arshavsky
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Rapid and reproducible deactivation of rhodopsin requires multiple phosphorylation sites.

Authors:  A Mendez; M E Burns; A Roca; J Lem; L W Wu; M I Simon; D A Baylor; J Chen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Engineering aspects of enzymatic signal transduction: photoreceptors in the retina.

Authors:  P B Detwiler; S Ramanathan; A Sengupta; B I Shraiman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Crystal structure of rhodopsin: A G protein-coupled receptor.

Authors:  K Palczewski; T Kumasaka; T Hori; C A Behnke; H Motoshima; B A Fox; I Le Trong; D C Teller; T Okada; R E Stenkamp; M Yamamoto; M Miyano
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-08-04       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The role of steady phosphodiesterase activity in the kinetics and sensitivity of the light-adapted salamander rod photoresponse.

Authors:  S Nikonov; T D Lamb; E N Pugh
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.086

7.  Overexpression of rhodopsin alters the structure and photoresponse of rod photoreceptors.

Authors:  Xiao-Hong Wen; Lixin Shen; Richard S Brush; Norman Michaud; Muayyad R Al-Ubaidi; Vsevolod V Gurevich; Heidi E Hamm; Janis Lem; Emmanuele Dibenedetto; Robert E Anderson; Clint L Makino
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Structural determinants for regulation of phosphodiesterase by a G protein at 2.0 A.

Authors:  K C Slep; M A Kercher; W He; C W Cowan; T G Wensel; P B Sigler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-02-22       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Slowed recovery of rod photoresponse in mice lacking the GTPase accelerating protein RGS9-1.

Authors:  C K Chen; M E Burns; W He; T G Wensel; D A Baylor; M I Simon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-03       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Collision coupling, crosstalk, and compartmentalization in G-protein coupled receptor systems: can a single model explain disparate results?

Authors:  Christopher J Brinkerhoff; John R Traynor; Jennifer J Linderman
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 2.691

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Speed, sensitivity, and stability of the light response in rod and cone photoreceptors: facts and models.

Authors:  Juan I Korenbrot
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 21.198

2.  Arrestin-1 expression level in rods: balancing functional performance and photoreceptor health.

Authors:  X Song; S A Vishnivetskiy; J Seo; J Chen; E V Gurevich; V V Gurevich
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Robust self-association is a common feature of mammalian visual arrestin-1.

Authors:  Miyeon Kim; Susan M Hanson; Sergey A Vishnivetskiy; Xiufeng Song; Whitney M Cleghorn; Wayne L Hubbell; Vsevolod V Gurevich
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Identification of key factors that reduce the variability of the single photon response.

Authors:  Giovanni Caruso; Paolo Bisegna; Daniele Andreucci; Leonardo Lenoci; Vsevolod V Gurevich; Heidi E Hamm; Emmanuele DiBenedetto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The phototransduction machinery in the rod outer segment has a strong efficacy gradient.

Authors:  Monica Mazzolini; Giuseppe Facchetti; Laura Andolfi; Remo Proietti Zaccaria; Salvatore Tuccio; Johannes Treu; Claudio Altafini; Enzo M Di Fabrizio; Marco Lazzarino; Gert Rapp; Vincent Torre
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  The functional cycle of visual arrestins in photoreceptor cells.

Authors:  Vsevolod V Gurevich; Susan M Hanson; Xiufeng Song; Sergey A Vishnivetskiy; Eugenia V Gurevich
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 21.198

7.  Calcium feedback to cGMP synthesis strongly attenuates single-photon responses driven by long rhodopsin lifetimes.

Authors:  Owen P Gross; Edward N Pugh; Marie E Burns
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Kinetics of rhodopsin deactivation and its role in regulating recovery and reproducibility of rod photoresponse.

Authors:  Giovanni Caruso; Paolo Bisegna; Leonardo Lenoci; Daniele Andreucci; Vsevolod V Gurevich; Heidi E Hamm; Emmanuele DiBenedetto
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Speed, adaptation, and stability of the response to light in cone photoreceptors: the functional role of Ca-dependent modulation of ligand sensitivity in cGMP-gated ion channels.

Authors:  Juan I Korenbrot
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  Common dynamical features of sensory adaptation in photoreceptors and olfactory sensory neurons.

Authors:  Giovanna De Palo; Giuseppe Facchetti; Monica Mazzolini; Anna Menini; Vincent Torre; Claudio Altafini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.