| Literature DB >> 29648512 |
Joanna Prentice1, Tarik Amer1,2, Ali Tasleem3, Omar Aboumarzouk1,2,4.
Abstract
Over the last thirty years, the management of Malignant Ureteric Obstruction (MUO) has evolved from a single disciplinary decision to a multi-disciplinary approach. Careful consideration must be given to the risks and benefits of decompression of hydronephrosis for an individual patient. There is a lack of consensus of opinion as well as strong evidence to support the decision process. Outcomes that were identified amongst patients undergoing treatment for MUO included prognosis, quality of life (QOL), complications, morbidity and prognostication tools. A total of 63 papers were included. Median survival was 6.4 months in the 53 papers that stated this outcome. Significant predictors to poor outcomes included low serum albumin, hyponatremia, the number of malignancy related events, and performance status of 2 or worse on the European cooperative cancer group. We propose a multi-centre review of outcomes to enable evidence-based consultations for patients and their families.Entities:
Keywords: Clinical; end of life decisions (palliative care); oncology; palliative care; urological cancer; urology
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29648512 PMCID: PMC5900840 DOI: 10.1177/0141076818766725
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J R Soc Med ISSN: 0141-0768 Impact factor: 5.344