David M Hyman1, Michael W Sill2, Heather A Lankes3, Richard Piekarz4, Mark S Shahin5, Mildred R Ridgway6, Floor Backes7, Meaghen E Tenney8, Cara A Mathews9, James S Hoffman10, Carol Aghajanian11, Martee L Hensley12. 1. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA. Electronic address: hymand@mskcc.org. 2. NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA. Electronic address: msill@gogstats.org. 3. NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA. Electronic address: hlankes@gogstats.org. 4. Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. Electronic address: rpiekarz@nih.gov. 5. Abington Hospital, Jefferson Health, Abington, PA 19001, USA. Electronic address: mshahin@abingtonhealth.org. 6. University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA. Electronic address: mridgway@umc.edu. 7. Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Hilliard, OH 43026, USA. Electronic address: Floor.Backes@osumc.edu. 8. Gynecologic Oncology, The University of Chicago Medicine & Biological Sciences, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. Electronic address: mtenney@bsd.uchicago.edu. 9. Women & Infants Hospital, Providence, RI 02905, USA. Electronic address: cmathews@wihri.org. 10. Hospital of Central Connecticut, New Britain, CT 06050, USA. Electronic address: James.HoffmanMD@baystatehealth.org. 11. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA. Electronic address: aghajanc@mskcc.org. 12. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA. Electronic address: hensleym@mskcc.org.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This two-stage Phase II study assessed the activity of single agent alisertib in patients with recurrent/persistent uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS). METHODS: Eligibility criteria included histologically-confirmed, recurrent or persistent uLMS, age≥18, 1-2 prior cytotoxic regimens, and RECIST version 1.1 measurable disease. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of alisertib through the frequency of patients with objective tumor responses and the frequency who survived event-free for at least 6months (EFS6). The endpoints for EFS were RECIST progression, death, or beginning a subsequent therapy. The null hypothesis jointly specified the probability of a patient experiencing a tumor response to less than or equal to 5% and the probability of a patient surviving event-free for at least 6months to less than or equal to 20%. A two-stage design was used with a target accrual of 23 patients for stage 1 and 47 pts. cumulative for stage 2. Confidence intervals do not correct for multiplicity. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were enrolled with two patients excluded on central histology review, yielding 21 eligible patients. Median age was 61years. Prior treatment was either 1 cytotoxic regimen (71.4%) or 2 (28.6%). The most common treatment related AEs (grade 3 or worse) were anemia Hensley et al. (2008a) , leukopenia Hensley et al. (2008b) , neutropenia Maki et al. (2007) , thrombocytopenia Huang et al. (2012) , mucositis Hensley et al. (2008a) , diarrhea Huang et al. (2012) , and palmer-planter syndrome Zivanovic et al. (2012) . There were no objective responses (0%; 90% CI: 0-10.4%). Best response was stable disease (38.1%); 12 patients had progressive disease (57.1%). EFS6 was 0% (90% CI: 0-10.4%). Median PFS and OS were 1.7 (90% CI: 1.4-3.2) and 14.5months (90% CI: 7.6 - NA), respectively. CONCLUSION: Alisertib did not demonstrate clinically meaningful single agent activity in previously treated uLMS.
OBJECTIVE: This two-stage Phase II study assessed the activity of single agent alisertib in patients with recurrent/persistent uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS). METHODS: Eligibility criteria included histologically-confirmed, recurrent or persistent uLMS, age≥18, 1-2 prior cytotoxic regimens, and RECIST version 1.1 measurable disease. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of alisertib through the frequency of patients with objective tumor responses and the frequency who survived event-free for at least 6months (EFS6). The endpoints for EFS were RECIST progression, death, or beginning a subsequent therapy. The null hypothesis jointly specified the probability of a patient experiencing a tumor response to less than or equal to 5% and the probability of a patient surviving event-free for at least 6months to less than or equal to 20%. A two-stage design was used with a target accrual of 23 patients for stage 1 and 47 pts. cumulative for stage 2. Confidence intervals do not correct for multiplicity. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were enrolled with two patients excluded on central histology review, yielding 21 eligible patients. Median age was 61years. Prior treatment was either 1 cytotoxic regimen (71.4%) or 2 (28.6%). The most common treatment related AEs (grade 3 or worse) were anemia Hensley et al. (2008a) , leukopenia Hensley et al. (2008b) , neutropenia Maki et al. (2007) , thrombocytopenia Huang et al. (2012) , mucositis Hensley et al. (2008a) , diarrhea Huang et al. (2012) , and palmer-planter syndrome Zivanovic et al. (2012) . There were no objective responses (0%; 90% CI: 0-10.4%). Best response was stable disease (38.1%); 12 patients had progressive disease (57.1%). EFS6 was 0% (90% CI: 0-10.4%). Median PFS and OS were 1.7 (90% CI: 1.4-3.2) and 14.5months (90% CI: 7.6 - NA), respectively. CONCLUSION:Alisertib did not demonstrate clinically meaningful single agent activity in previously treated uLMS.
Authors: Winette T A van der Graaf; Jean-Yves Blay; Sant P Chawla; Dong-Wan Kim; Binh Bui-Nguyen; Paolo G Casali; Patrick Schöffski; Massimo Aglietta; Arthur P Staddon; Yasuo Beppu; Axel Le Cesne; Hans Gelderblom; Ian R Judson; Nobuhito Araki; Monia Ouali; Sandrine Marreaud; Rachel Hodge; Mohammed R Dewji; Corneel Coens; George D Demetri; Christopher D Fletcher; Angelo Paolo Dei Tos; Peter Hohenberger Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-05-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Naiyer A Rizvi; Matthew D Hellmann; Alexandra Snyder; Pia Kvistborg; Vladimir Makarov; Jonathan J Havel; William Lee; Jianda Yuan; Phillip Wong; Teresa S Ho; Martin L Miller; Natasha Rekhtman; Andre L Moreira; Fawzia Ibrahim; Cameron Bruggeman; Billel Gasmi; Roberta Zappasodi; Yuka Maeda; Chris Sander; Edward B Garon; Taha Merghoub; Jedd D Wolchok; Ton N Schumacher; Timothy A Chan Journal: Science Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Robert G Maki; David R D'Adamo; Mary L Keohan; Michael Saulle; Scott M Schuetze; Samir D Undevia; Michael B Livingston; Matthew M Cooney; Martee L Hensley; Monica M Mita; Chris H Takimoto; Andrew S Kraft; Anthony D Elias; Bruce Brockstein; Nathalie E Blachère; Mark A Edgar; Lawrence H Schwartz; Li-Xuan Qin; Cristina R Antonescu; Gary K Schwartz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-05-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M A Dickson; M R Mahoney; W D Tap; S P D'Angelo; M L Keohan; B A Van Tine; M Agulnik; L E Horvath; J S Nair; G K Schwartz Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2016-08-08 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: George D Demetri; Sant P Chawla; Margaret von Mehren; Paul Ritch; Laurence H Baker; Jean Y Blay; Kenneth R Hande; Mary L Keohan; Brian L Samuels; Scott Schuetze; Claudia Lebedinsky; Yusri A Elsayed; Miguel A Izquierdo; Javier Gómez; Youn C Park; Axel Le Cesne Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-08-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Stefanie M Ueda; Daniel S Kapp; Michael K Cheung; Jacob Y Shin; Kathryn Osann; Amreen Husain; Nelson N Teng; Jonathan S Berek; John K Chan Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Robert G Maki; J Kyle Wathen; Shreyaskumar R Patel; Dennis A Priebat; Scott H Okuno; Brian Samuels; Michael Fanucchi; David C Harmon; Scott M Schuetze; Denise Reinke; Peter F Thall; Robert S Benjamin; Laurence H Baker; Martee L Hensley Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-07-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Flávia Melo Cunha de Pinho Pessoa; Caio Bezerra Machado; Emerson Lucena da Silva; Laudreísa da Costa Pantoja; Rodrigo Monteiro Ribeiro; Maria Elisabete Amaral de Moraes; Manoel Odorico de Moraes Filho; Raquel Carvalho Montenegro; André Salim Khayat; Caroline Aquino Moreira-Nunes Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-03-30 Impact factor: 5.923