Literature DB >> 12885837

Randomized phase II comparison of dose-intense gemcitabine: thirty-minute infusion and fixed dose rate infusion in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Margaret Tempero1, William Plunkett, Veronique Ruiz Van Haperen, John Hainsworth, Howard Hochster, Renato Lenzi, James Abbruzzese.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To conduct a randomized phase II trial of dose-intense gemcitabine using a standard 30-minute infusion or the fixed dose rate (FDR) infusion (10 mg/m2/min) in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective trial, patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were treated with 2,200 mg/m2 gemcitabine over 30 minutes (standard arm) or 1,500 mg/m2 gemcitabine over 150 minutes (FDR arm) on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 4-week cycle. The primary end point of this trial was time to treatment failure. Secondary end points included time to progression, median survival, safety, and pharmacokinetic studies of gemcitabine.
RESULTS: Ninety-two patients were enrolled onto this study; 91% of the patients had metastatic disease. Time to treatment failure was comparable in both treatment groups; however, the median survival for all patients was 5.0 months in the standard arm and 8.0 months in the FDR arm (P =.013). For patients with metastases, the median survival was 4.9 months in the standard arm and 7.3 months in FDR arm (P =.094). The 1- and 2-year survival rates for all patients were 9% (standard arm) versus 28.8% (FDR; P =.014) and 2.2% (standard arm) versus 18.3% (FDR; P =.007), respectively. Patients in the FDR infusion arm experienced consistently more hematologic toxicity. Pharmacokinetic analyses demonstrated a two-fold increase in intracellular gemcitabine triphosphate concentration in the FDR arm (P =.046).
CONCLUSION: Pharmacokinetic and clinical data in this trial supports the continued evaluation of the FDR infusion strategy with gemcitabine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12885837     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.09.140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  127 in total

Review 1.  [Best supportive care of pancreatic carcinoma].

Authors:  K Schoppmeyer; J Mössner
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 2.  Developments in metastatic pancreatic cancer: is gemcitabine still the standard?

Authors:  Jie-Er Ying; Li-Ming Zhu; Bi-Xia Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  How I treat pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Margaret A Tempero
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Margaret A Tempero; J Pablo Arnoletti; Stephen Behrman; Edgar Ben-Josef; Al B Benson; Jordan D Berlin; John L Cameron; Ephraim S Casper; Steven J Cohen; Michelle Duff; Joshua D I Ellenhorn; William G Hawkins; John P Hoffman; Boris W Kuvshinoff; Mokenge P Malafa; Peter Muscarella; Eric K Nakakura; Aaron R Sasson; Sarah P Thayer; Douglas S Tyler; Robert S Warren; Samuel Whiting; Christopher Willett; Robert A Wolff
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 11.908

5.  High-dose infusional gemcitabine combined with busulfan and melphalan with autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with refractory lymphoid malignancies.

Authors:  Yago Nieto; Peter Thall; Ben Valdez; Borje Andersson; Uday Popat; Paolo Anderlini; Elizabeth J Shpall; Roland Bassett; Amin Alousi; Chitra Hosing; Partow Kebriaei; Muzaffar Qazilbash; Erin Frazier; Alison Gulbis; Christina Chancoco; Qaiser Bashir; Stefan Ciurea; Issa Khouri; Simrit Parmar; Nina Shah; Laura Worth; Gabriela Rondon; Richard Champlin; Roy B Jones
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2012-05-27       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Preclinical Rationale for the Phase III Trials in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Is Wishful Thinking Clouding Successful Drug Development for Pancreatic Cancer?

Authors:  Ramya Thota; Anirban Maitra; Jordan D Berlin
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 7.  Chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Gregory Friberg; Hedy Lee Kindler
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  Fixed dose-rate gemcitabine as radiosensitizer for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a dose-finding study.

Authors:  Alessandra Fabi; Alessandra Mirri; Alessandra Felici; Antonello Vidiri; Andrea Pace; Emanuele Occhipinti; Francesco Cognetti; Giorgio Arcangeli; Bruno Iandolo; Maria Antonia Carosi; Giulio Metro; Carmine Maria Carapella
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  A phase I study of prolonged infusion of triapine in combination with fixed dose rate gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Amir Mortazavi; Yonghua Ling; Ludmila Katherine Martin; Lai Wei; Mitch A Phelps; Zhongfa Liu; Erica J Harper; S Percy Ivy; Xin Wu; Bing-Sen Zhou; Xiyong Liu; Deidre Deam; J Paul Monk; William J Hicks; Yun Yen; Gregory A Otterson; Michael R Grever; Tanios Bekaii-Saab
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.850

10.  Randomized multicenter and stratified phase II study of gemcitabine alone versus gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with metastatic or relapsed leiomyosarcomas: a Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC) French Sarcoma Group Study (TAXOGEM study).

Authors:  Patricia Pautier; Anne Floquet; Nicolas Penel; Sophie Piperno-Neumann; Nicolas Isambert; Annie Rey; Emmanuelle Bompas; Angela Cioffi; Corinne Delcambre; Didier Cupissol; Françoise Collin; Jean-Yves Blay; Marta Jimenez; Florence Duffaud
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-08-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.