Literature DB >> 18393474

Assessment of the accuracy of density functionals for prediction of relative energies and geometries of low-lying isomers of water hexamers.

Erin E Dahlke1, Ryan M Olson, Hannah R Leverentz, Donald G Truhlar.   

Abstract

Water hexamers provide a critical testing ground for validating potential energy surface predictions because they contain structural motifs not present in smaller clusters. We tested the ability of 11 density functionals (four of which are local and seven of which are nonlocal) to accurately predict the relative energies of a series of low-lying water hexamers, relative to the CCSD(T)/aug'-cc-pVTZ level of theory, where CCSD(T) denotes coupled cluster theory with an interative treatment of single and double excitations and a quasi-perturbative treatment of connected triple excitations. Five of the density functionals were tested with two different basis sets, making a total of 16 levels of density functional theory (DFT) tested. When single-point energy calculations are carried out on geometries obtained with second-order Møller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2), only three density functionals, M06-L, M05-2X, and M06-2X, are able to correctly predict the relative energy ordering of the hexamers. These three functionals predict that the range of energies spanned by the six isomers is 3.2-5.6 kcal/mol, whereas the other eight functionals predict ranges of 1.0-2.4 kcal/mol; the benchmark value for this range is 3.1 kcal/mol. When the hexamers are optimized at each level of theory, all methods are able to reproduce the MP2 geometries well for all isomers except the boat and bag isomers, and DFT optimization changes the energy ordering for seven of the 16 methods tested. The addition of zero-point energy changes the energy ordering for all of the density functionals studied except for M05-2X and M06-2X. The variation in relative energies predicted by the different methods highlights the necessity for exercising caution in the choice of density functionals used in future studies. Of the 11 density functionals tested, the most accurate results for energies were obtained with the PWB6K, MPWB1K, and M05-2X functionals.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 18393474     DOI: 10.1021/jp077376k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem A        ISSN: 1089-5639            Impact factor:   2.781


  9 in total

1.  Localized orbital corrections applied to thermochemical errors in density functional theory: The role of basis set and application to molecular reactions.

Authors:  Dahlia A Goldfeld; Arteum D Bochevarov; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-12-07       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Comparison of some dispersion-corrected and traditional functionals with CCSD(T) and MP2 ab initio methods: dispersion, induction, and basis set superposition error.

Authors:  Dipankar Roy; Mateusz Marianski; Neepa T Maitra; J J Dannenberg
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2012-10-07       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Catalytic Efficiency Is a Function of How Rhodium(I) (5 + 2) Catalysts Accommodate a Conserved Substrate Transition State Geometry: Induced Fit Model for Explaining Transition Metal Catalysis.

Authors:  Thomas J L Mustard; Paul A Wender; Paul Ha-Yeon Cheong
Journal:  ACS Catal       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 13.084

4.  A comparison of the behavior of functional/basis set combinations for hydrogen-bonding in the water dimer with emphasis on basis set superposition error.

Authors:  Joshua A Plumley; J J Dannenberg
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 3.376

5.  Self-interaction error overbinds water clusters but cancels in structural energy differences.

Authors:  Kamal Sharkas; Kamal Wagle; Biswajit Santra; Sharmin Akter; Rajendra R Zope; Tunna Baruah; Koblar A Jackson; John P Perdew; Juan E Peralta
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Formation of an Amine-Water Cyclic Pentamer: A New Type of Water Cluster in a Polyazacryptand.

Authors:  Musabbir A Saeed; Bryan M Wong; Frank R Fronczek; Ramaiyer Venkatraman; Md Alamgir Hossain
Journal:  Cryst Growth Des       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 4.076

7.  A novel hypothesis for atherosclerosis as a cholesterol sulfate deficiency syndrome.

Authors:  Stephanie Seneff; Robert M Davidson; Ann Lauritzen; Anthony Samsel; Glyn Wainwright
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 2.432

8.  Exploring water radiolysis in proton cancer therapy: Time-dependent, non-adiabatic simulations of H+ + (H2O)1-6.

Authors:  Austin J Privett; Erico S Teixeira; Christopher Stopera; Jorge A Morales
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Ring-Stacking Water Clusters: Morphology and Stabilities.

Authors:  Liu Yang; Hanyang Ji; Xiaojie Liu; Wen-Cai Lu
Journal:  ChemistryOpen       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 2.911

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.