Literature DB >> 18392060

"If everyone does it, it's not a big deal." Young people talk about chlamydia testing.

Sally B Rose1, M Camille Smith, Beverley A Lawton.   

Abstract

AIMS: This study aimed to explore young people's attitudes to chlamydia testing. Data were gathered to inform the development of a clinical trial aimed at increasing chlamydia testing among 16-24 year olds.
METHODS: Four single sex focus groups were conducted with 16-24 year old males and females (n=28), and one with health professionals working with this age-group (n=7). A semi-structured interview schedule was used to discuss barriers to chlamydia testing, methods of accessing testing, communicating information about chlamydia and ideas about ways to encourage testing.
RESULTS: Reasons for not seeking testing included fear, stigma, denial of personal risk, and a lack of knowledge about chlamydia and about testing procedures. Better education and a need to 'normalise' testing were suggested as ways to increase test-uptake. Preferences for places to seek testing varied among participants, but all groups supported routinely offered chlamydia testing when visiting the doctor for other reasons. Participants also favoured the concept of home-testing.
CONCLUSIONS: Young people identified a number of barriers to chlamydia testing, as well as ways to increase testing. These findings can be used to inform the development of much needed new initiatives to control chlamydia in New Zealand.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18392060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Z Med J        ISSN: 0028-8446


  12 in total

1.  What influences university students to seek sexually transmitted infection testing?: A qualitative study in New Zealand.

Authors:  Hayley J Denison; Collette Bromhead; Rebecca Grainger; Elaine M Dennison; Annemarie Jutel
Journal:  Sex Reprod Healthc       Date:  2018-01-31

2.  Exploring pharmacy and home-based sexually transmissible infection testing.

Authors:  Melissa A Habel; Roberta Scheinmann; Elizabeth Verdesoto; Charlotte Gaydos; Maggie Bertisch; Mary Ann Chiasson
Journal:  Sex Health       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.706

3.  Adapting the Get Yourself Tested Campaign to Reach Black and Latino Sexual-Minority Youth.

Authors:  Samantha Garbers; Allison Friedman; Omar Martinez; Roberta Scheinmann; Dayana Bermudez; Manel Silva; Jen Silverman; Mary Ann Chiasson
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2016-05-24

4.  Can e-technology through the Internet be used as a new tool to address the Chlamydia trachomatis epidemic by home sampling and vaginal swabs?

Authors:  Charlotte A Gaydos; Mathilda Barnes; Bulbul Aumakhan; Nicole Quinn; Patricia Agreda; Pamela Whittle; Terry Hogan
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.830

5.  "...they should be offering it": a qualitative study to investigate young peoples' attitudes towards chlamydia screening in GP surgeries.

Authors:  Angela H Hogan; Rebecca S Howell-Jones; Elizabeth Pottinger; Louise M Wallace; Cliodna Am McNulty
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Practice nurse chlamydia testing in Australian general practice: a qualitative study of benefits, barriers and facilitators.

Authors:  Rebecca Lorch; Jane Hocking; Rebecca Guy; Alaina Vaisey; Anna Wood; Dyani Lewis; Meredith Temple-Smith
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  The influence of two different invitation letters on Chlamydia testing participation: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Gill Ten Hoor; Christian Jpa Hoebe; Jan Eam van Bergen; Elfi Ehg Brouwers; Robert Ac Ruiter; Gerjo Kok
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Perceptions of Self-Testing for Chlamydia: Understanding and Predicting Self-Test Use.

Authors:  Rachael Powell; Helen M Pattison; John F Marriott
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2016-05-10

9.  Non-participation in chlamydia screening in The Netherlands: determinants associated with young people's intention to participate in chlamydia screening.

Authors:  Gill A ten Hoor; Robert A C Ruiter; Jan E A M van Bergen; Christian J P A Hoebe; Katrijn Houben; Gerjo Kok
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Comparing mail-in self-collected specimens sent via United States Postal Service versus clinic-collected specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in extra-genital sites.

Authors:  Katheryn R Salow; Adam C Cohen; Claire C Bristow; Mark R McGrath; Jeffrey D Klausner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.