BACKGROUND: Culturally appropriate efforts are needed to increase sexually transmitted disease (STD) testing and care among Black and Latino sexual-minority youth, who are at high risk for STDs. Get Yourself Tested, a national testing campaign, has demonstrated success among youth, but it has yet to be assessed for relevance or impact among this population. METHOD: This effort included (1) formative and materials-testing research through focus groups; (2) adaptation of existing Get Yourself Tested campaign materials to be more inclusive of Black and Latino sexual-minority youth; (3) a 3-month campaign in four venues of New York City, promoting STD testing at events and through mobile testing and online and social media platforms; (4) process evaluation of outreach activities; and (5) an outcome evaluation of testing at select campaign venues, using a preexperimental design. RESULTS: During the 3-month campaign period, the number of STD tests conducted at select campaign venues increased from a comparable 3-month baseline period. Although testing uptake through mobile vans remained low in absolute numbers, the van drew a high-prevalence sample, with positivity rates of 26.9% for chlamydia and 11.5% for gonorrhea. This article documents the process and lessons learned from adapting and implementing a local campaign for Black and Latino sexual-minority youth.
BACKGROUND: Culturally appropriate efforts are needed to increase sexually transmitted disease (STD) testing and care among Black and Latino sexual-minority youth, who are at high risk for STDs. Get Yourself Tested, a national testing campaign, has demonstrated success among youth, but it has yet to be assessed for relevance or impact among this population. METHOD: This effort included (1) formative and materials-testing research through focus groups; (2) adaptation of existing Get Yourself Tested campaign materials to be more inclusive of Black and Latino sexual-minority youth; (3) a 3-month campaign in four venues of New York City, promoting STD testing at events and through mobile testing and online and social media platforms; (4) process evaluation of outreach activities; and (5) an outcome evaluation of testing at select campaign venues, using a preexperimental design. RESULTS: During the 3-month campaign period, the number of STD tests conducted at select campaign venues increased from a comparable 3-month baseline period. Although testing uptake through mobile vans remained low in absolute numbers, the van drew a high-prevalence sample, with positivity rates of 26.9% for chlamydia and 11.5% for gonorrhea. This article documents the process and lessons learned from adapting and implementing a local campaign for Black and Latino sexual-minority youth.
Keywords:
LGBT; focus groups; health promotion; minority health; sexual health; sexually transmitted diseases/prevention and control; social marketing/health communication
Authors: Jonathan M Ellen; Sekhar Bonu; Jaime S Arruda; Michael A Ward; Ruth Vogel Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2003-04-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Kenneth H Mayer; Judith B Bradford; Harvey J Makadon; Ron Stall; Hilary Goldhammer; Stewart Landers Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2008-04-29 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Allison L Friedman; Kathryn A Brookmeyer; Rachel E Kachur; Jessie Ford; Matthew Hogben; Melissa A Habel; Leslie M Kantor; Elizabeth Clark; Jamie Sabatini; Mary McFarlane Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Ellen Pittman; Hillary Purcell; Laura Dize; Charlotte Gaydos; Sherine Patterson-Rose; Frank Biro; DeAnna Owens; Lea E Widdice Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2017-09-29 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: A Movsisyan; L Arnold; L Copeland; R Evans; H Littlecott; G Moore; A O'Cathain; L Pfadenhauer; J Segrott; E Rehfuess Journal: Health Res Policy Syst Date: 2021-02-05
Authors: Emma Pearce; Kate Jolly; Isobel Marion Harris; Ada Adriano; David Moore; Malcolm Price; Jonathan Ross Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2021-08-26 Impact factor: 3.519