Literature DB >> 18391720

Success of lumbar microdiscectomy in patients with modic changes and low-back pain: a prospective pilot study.

Kingsley R Chin1, Daniel T Tomlinson, Joshua D Auerbach, Joshua B Shatsky, Carl A Deirmengian.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective case controlled.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the outcome after microdiscectomy in patients with disc herniation, concordant sciatica, and low-back pain with Modic I and II degenerative changes compared with similar patients without Modic changes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The decision to perform a microdiscectomy versus a fusion or total disc replacement in a patient with a disc herniation and sciatica may be confounded by the presence of low-back pain, degenerative disc disease, and marrow and endplate (Modic) changes.
METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients underwent a microdiscectomy by a single surgeon. Group 1 consisted of 15 patients, 6 men and 9 women, with a mean age of 36.7 years (range, 21 to 48 y), with Modic I and II changes. Group 2 contained 15 patients, 9 men and 6 women, with a mean age of 34.1 years (range, 20 to 68 y), without Modic changes. The average duration of low-back pain before surgery was 25.6 months (range 4 to 120 mo) in group 1 and 17.5 months (range 5 to 120 mo) in group 2. The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to grade low-back pain and the Oswestry score was used to grade overall disability.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in preoperative sciatica, low-back pain, VAS or Oswestry scores for group 1 versus group 2 patients. Postoperatively, all patents had improved sciatica and resolution of any nerve tension sign. Eighty-six percent of patients in group 1 versus 93% of patients in group 2 had improvements in postoperative VAS score for low-back pain at 6 months. Average improvement within each group was 67% and 75%, respectively. VAS scores for low-back pain at 6 months improved from 6.9 to 2.3 (P=0.0005) in group 1 and 6.3 to 1.6 (P=0.0002) in group 2. Group 1 and 2 had 89% and 100% of patients show improvement in postoperative Oswestry score at 6 months with an average improvement of 58% and 84%, respectively. Oswestry scores at 6 months improved from 68.7% to 28.8% (P=0.0007) in group 1 and 61.2% to 9.9% (P=0.00003) in group 2.
CONCLUSIONS: There was a trend toward greater improvement in Oswestry scores in patients without Modic changes (P=0.09). Both groups reported statistically significant improvement in sciatica, low-back pain, and disability after microdiscectomy. Microdiscectomy was therefore an effective treatment for disc herniation and concordant sciatica despite low-back pain and Modic I and II degenerative changes. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18391720     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318093e5dc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  18 in total

Review 1.  Non-Specific Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Jean-François Chenot; Bernhard Greitemann; Bernd Kladny; Frank Petzke; Michael Pfingsten; Susanne Gabriele Schorr
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-12-25       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  The outcome of decompression surgery for lumbar herniated disc is influenced by the level of concomitant preoperative low back pain.

Authors:  F S Kleinstueck; T Fekete; D Jeszenszky; A F Mannion; D Grob; F Lattig; U Mutter; F Porchet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Do Modic changes have an impact on clinical outcome in lumbar spine surgery? A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Aske Foldbjerg Laustsen; Rachid Bech-Azeddine
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Lumbar disc herniation treated by microendoscopic discectomy : Prognostic predictors of long-term postoperative outcome.

Authors:  Xin Hong; Rui Shi; Yun-Tao Wang; Lei Liu; Jun-Ping Bao; Xiao-Tao Wu
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Survey of lumbar discectomy practices: 10 years in the making.

Authors:  Majid Aljoghaiman; Amanda Martyniuk; Forough Farrokhyar; Aleksa Cenic; Edward Kachur
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-09

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging predictors of surgical outcome in patients with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.

Authors:  Jon D Lurie; Rachel A Moses; Anna N A Tosteson; Tor D Tosteson; Eugene J Carragee; John A Carrino; Jay A Kaiser; Richard J Herzog
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Modic type I changes and recovery of back pain after lumbar microdiscectomy.

Authors:  Andreas Sørlie; Viggo Moholdt; Kjell Arne Kvistad; Øystein P Nygaard; Tor Ingebrigtsen; Trond Iversen; Roar Kloster; Tore K Solberg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-29       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  The association between Modic changes and pain during 1-year follow-up in patients with lumbar radicular pain.

Authors:  Elina Iordanova Schistad; Ansgar Espeland; Lars Jørgen Rygh; Cecilie Røe; Johannes Gjerstad
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Association between MRI findings and clinical outcomes in a period of 5 years after lumbar spine microdiscectomy.

Authors:  Evangelos I Papanastasiou; Daphne J Theodorou; Stavroula J Theodorou; Emilios E Pakos; Avraam Ploumis; Anastasios V Korompilias; Ioannis D Gelalis
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-11-02

10.  A Prospective Analysis of the Supine and Sitting Straight-Leg Raise Test and Its Performance in Litigation Patients.

Authors:  Olukemi K Fajolu; Fabio J R Pencle; Samuel Rosas; Kingsley R Chin
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-03-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.