BACKGROUND: The function of the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) during gait has not been reported. HYPOTHESIS: The AM and PL bundles have distinct functional behavior during the stance phase of treadmill gait. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: Three-dimensional models of the knee were created by magnetic resonance images from 8 healthy subjects. The contour of the 2 bundle attachments were constructed on each model. Each bundle was represented by a straight line connecting its tibial and femoral attachment centroids. Next, the knee kinematics during the stance phase of gait was determined with a dual fluoroscopic imaging system. The relative elongation, sagittal plane elevation, coronal plane elevation, and transverse plane deviation of the 2 bundles were measured directly from heel strike to toe-off. RESULTS: At heel strike, the AM and PL bundles had first peak elongation of 9% +/- 7% and 9% +/- 13%, respectively. At 50% progress of the stance phase, both bundles were maximally elongated, 12% +/- 7% for the AM bundle and 13% +/- 15% for the PL bundle. No significant difference was found for each bundle between 40% and 60% of the stance phase (P > .05). With increasing knee flexion, the sagittal plane and coronal plane elevations of the 2 bundles decreased, whereas the deviation angles increased. CONCLUSION: Both bundles are anisometric and function in a similar manner during the stance phase of gait. They were maximally elongated throughout the midstance where they were stretched maximally to resist anterior tibial translation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This information can be useful for further improving anatomical ACL reconstructions to better reproduce the 2 bundle functions. It may also be useful for designing postoperative rehabilitation regimens to prevent overstretch of the grafts.
BACKGROUND: The function of the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) during gait has not been reported. HYPOTHESIS: The AM and PL bundles have distinct functional behavior during the stance phase of treadmill gait. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: Three-dimensional models of the knee were created by magnetic resonance images from 8 healthy subjects. The contour of the 2 bundle attachments were constructed on each model. Each bundle was represented by a straight line connecting its tibial and femoral attachment centroids. Next, the knee kinematics during the stance phase of gait was determined with a dual fluoroscopic imaging system. The relative elongation, sagittal plane elevation, coronal plane elevation, and transverse plane deviation of the 2 bundles were measured directly from heel strike to toe-off. RESULTS: At heel strike, the AM and PL bundles had first peak elongation of 9% +/- 7% and 9% +/- 13%, respectively. At 50% progress of the stance phase, both bundles were maximally elongated, 12% +/- 7% for the AM bundle and 13% +/- 15% for the PL bundle. No significant difference was found for each bundle between 40% and 60% of the stance phase (P > .05). With increasing knee flexion, the sagittal plane and coronal plane elevations of the 2 bundles decreased, whereas the deviation angles increased. CONCLUSION: Both bundles are anisometric and function in a similar manner during the stance phase of gait. They were maximally elongated throughout the midstance where they were stretched maximally to resist anterior tibial translation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This information can be useful for further improving anatomical ACL reconstructions to better reproduce the 2 bundle functions. It may also be useful for designing postoperative rehabilitation regimens to prevent overstretch of the grafts.
Authors: Bruce D Beynnon; Benjamin S Uh; Robert J Johnson; Joseph A Abate; Claude E Nichols; Braden C Fleming; A Robin Poole; Harald Roos Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Andrew D Pearle; Fintan J Shannon; Carinne Granchi; Thomas L Wickiewicz; Russell F Warren Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2008-04-03 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Philippe Colombet; James Robinson; Stéphane Jambou; Michel Allard; Vincent Bousquet; Christophe de Lavigne Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2005-12-09 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: K A Taylor; M E Terry; G M Utturkar; C E Spritzer; R M Queen; L A Irribarra; W E Garrett; L E DeFrate Journal: J Biomech Date: 2010-11-18 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Sean D Smith; Robert F Laprade; Kyle S Jansson; Asbjørn Arøen; Coen A Wijdicks Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2013-04-27 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Zoë A Englander; Edward L Baldwin; Wyatt A R Smith; William E Garrett; Charles E Spritzer; Louis E DeFrate Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2019-10-08 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: William B Wainright; Charles E Spritzer; Jun Young Lee; Mark E Easley; James K DeOrio; James A Nunley; Louis E DeFrate Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2012-08-10 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Sophia Y Kim; Charles E Spritzer; Gangadhar M Utturkar; Alison P Toth; William E Garrett; Louis E DeFrate Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2015-08-11 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Zoë A Englander; Jocelyn R Wittstein; Adam P Goode; William E Garrett; Louis E DeFrate Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2020-06-09 Impact factor: 6.202