Literature DB >> 1838617

Interaction of height and mechanical loading of the spine in the development of low-back pain.

K Walsh1, M Cruddas, D Coggon.   

Abstract

The relation of low-back pain to height and physical activity was examined among 2667 British men and women aged 20-59 years and selected from the general population. Information about occupational activities, height, and lifetime history of low-back pain was obtained from a postal questionnaire. The lifetime prevalence of low-back pain was 58.3%. After allowance for other occupational activities, the onset of low-back pain was strongly associated with heavy lifting at work (men: relative risk (RR) 2.0, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.4-2.8; women: RR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3-3.5). For the men there was also an association with digging (RR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.3). Risk of low-back pain increased with height among the men but not among the women. The risks associated with heavy lifting and digging were greater for the short than for the tall men. Thus the data provide no justification for excluding tall men from heavy manual tasks, despite their greater susceptibility to back problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1838617     DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.1680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health        ISSN: 0355-3140            Impact factor:   5.024


  14 in total

1.  Short term influence of mechanical factors on regional musculoskeletal pain: a study of new workers from 12 occupational groups.

Authors:  E S Nahit; G J Macfarlane; C M Pritchard; N M Cherry; A J Silman
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Analysis by sex of low back pain among workers from small companies in the Paris area: severity and occupational consequences.

Authors:  J Alcouffe; P Manillier; M Brehier; C Fabin; F Faupin
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Individual participant data meta-analysis of mechanical workplace risk factors and low back pain.

Authors:  Lauren E Griffith; Harry S Shannon; Richard P Wells; Stephen D Walter; Donald C Cole; Pierre Côté; John Frank; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Lacey E Langlois
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The epidemiology of pain: the more you have, the more you get.

Authors:  P Croft
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Epidemiologic study of low back pain in 1398 Swiss conscripts between 1985 and 1992.

Authors:  M H Rohrer; B Santos-Eggimann; F Paccaud; E Haller-Maslov
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Prevalence and pattern of occupational exposure to whole body vibration in Great Britain: findings from a national survey.

Authors:  K T Palmer; M J Griffin; H Bendall; B Pannett; D Coggon
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.402

7.  Socioeconomic influences on back problems in the community in Britain.

Authors:  P R Croft; A S Rigby
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Low back pain in eight areas of Britain.

Authors:  K Walsh; M Cruddas; D Coggon
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  The relative importance of whole body vibration and occupational lifting as risk factors for low-back pain.

Authors:  K T Palmer; M J Griffin; H E Syddall; B Pannett; C Cooper; D Coggon
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.402

10.  Manual handling activities and risk of low back pain in nurses.

Authors:  J Smedley; P Egger; C Cooper; D Coggon
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.