Literature DB >> 10810108

Prevalence and pattern of occupational exposure to whole body vibration in Great Britain: findings from a national survey.

K T Palmer1, M J Griffin, H Bendall, B Pannett, D Coggon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the number of workers in Great Britain with significant occupational exposure to whole body vibration (WBV) and to identify the common sources of exposure and the occupations and industries where such exposures arise.
METHODS: A postal questionnaire was posted to a random community sample of 22,194 men and women of working age. Among other things, the questionnaire asked about exposure to WBV in the past week, including occupational and common non-occupational sources. Responses were assessed by occupation and industry, and national prevalence estimates were derived from census information. Estimates were also made of the average estimated daily personal dose of vibration (eVDV).
RESULTS: From the 12,907 responses it was estimated that 7.2 million men and 1.8 million women in Great Britain are exposed to WBV at work in a 1 week period if the occupational use of cars, vans, buses, trains, and motor cycles is included within the definition of exposure. The eVDV of >374,000 men and 9000 women was estimated to exceed a proposed British Standard action level of 15 ms(-1.75). Occupations in which the estimated exposures most often exceeded 15 ms(-1.75) included forklift truck and mechanical truck drivers, farm owners and managers, farm workers, and drivers of road goods vehicles. These occupations also contributed the largest estimated numbers of workers in Great Britain with such levels of exposure. The highest estimated median occupational eVDVs were found in forklift truck drivers, drivers of road goods vehicles, bus and coach drivers, and technical and wholesale sales representatives, among whom a greater contribution to total dose was received from occupational exposures than from non-occupational ones; but in many other occupations the reverse applied. The most common sources of occupational exposure to WBV are cars, vans, forklift trucks, lorries, tractors, buses, and loaders.
CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to whole body vibration is common, but only a small proportion of exposures exceed the action level proposed in British standards, and in many occupations, non-occupational sources are more important than those at work. The commonest occupational sources of WBV and occupations with particularly high exposures have been identified, providing a basis for targeting future control activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10810108      PMCID: PMC1739944          DOI: 10.1136/oem.57.4.229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  9 in total

1.  An epidemiological study of acute herniated lumbar intervertebral discs.

Authors:  J L Kelsey
Journal:  Rheumatol Rehabil       Date:  1975-08

2.  Back pain and exposure to whole body vibration in helicopter pilots.

Authors:  P M Bongers; C T Hulshof; L Dijkstra; H C Boshuizen; H J Groenhout; E Valken
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 3.  Back disorders in crane operators exposed to whole-body vibration.

Authors:  P M Bongers; H C Boshuizen; C T Hulshof; A P Koemeester
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Health survey of professional drivers.

Authors:  A L Backman
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 5.024

5.  Validity of self reported occupational exposures to hand transmitted and whole body vibration.

Authors:  K T Palmer; B Haward; M J Griffin; H Bendall; D Coggon
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Prevalence and pattern of occupational exposure to hand transmitted vibration in Great Britain: findings from a national survey.

Authors:  K T Palmer; M J Griffin; H Bendall; B Pannett; D Coggon
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.402

7.  Low-back pain in commercial travelers.

Authors:  F Pietri; A Leclerc; L Boitel; J F Chastang; J F Morcet; M Blondet
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 5.024

8.  Self-reported low back symptoms in urban bus drivers exposed to whole-body vibration.

Authors:  M Bovenzi; A Zadini
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Interaction of height and mechanical loading of the spine in the development of low-back pain.

Authors:  K Walsh; M Cruddas; D Coggon
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.024

  9 in total
  11 in total

1.  Experimental vibratory damage of the inner ear.

Authors:  Marek Bochnia; Konrad Morgenroth; Wojciech Dziewiszek; Jerzy Kassner
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2004-06-18       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Evaluation of an occupational health intervention programme on whole-body vibration in forklift truck drivers: a controlled trial.

Authors:  C T J Hulshof; J H A M Verbeek; I T J Braam; M Bovenzi; F J H van Dijk
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Vibration induced white-feet: overview and field study of vibration exposure and reported symptoms in workers.

Authors:  Tammy Eger; Aaron Thompson; Mallorie Leduc; Kristine Krajnak; Katie Goggins; Alison Godwin; Ron House
Journal:  Work       Date:  2014

4.  Validity of self reported occupational exposures to hand transmitted and whole body vibration.

Authors:  K T Palmer; B Haward; M J Griffin; H Bendall; D Coggon
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Mechanisms mediating vibration-induced chronic musculoskeletal pain analyzed in the rat.

Authors:  Olayinka A Dina; Elizabeth K Joseph; Jon D Levine; Paul G Green
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 5.820

6.  The impact of self-reported exposure to whole-body-vibrations on the risk of disability pension among men: a 15 year prospective study.

Authors:  Finn Tüchsen; Helene Feveile; Karl B Christensen; Niklas Krause
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  The relative importance of whole body vibration and occupational lifting as risk factors for low-back pain.

Authors:  K T Palmer; M J Griffin; H E Syddall; B Pannett; C Cooper; D Coggon
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 8.  Prostate cancer and driving occupations: could whole body vibration play a role?

Authors:  Erin Young; Nancy Kreiger; Jim Purdham; Andrea Sass-Kortsak
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 3.015

9.  Case-control study of low-back pain referred for magnetic resonance imaging, with special focus on whole-body vibration.

Authors:  Keith T Palmer; Clare E Harris; E Claire Harris; Michael J Griffin; James Bennett; Isabel Reading; Madelaine Sampson; David Coggon
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 5.024

Review 10.  Rheumatic effects of vibration at work.

Authors:  Keith T Palmer; Massimo Bovenzi
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 4.098

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.