Literature DB >> 18386110

Bariatric surgery: low mortality at a high-volume center.

Garth H Ballantyne1, Scott Belsley, Daniel Stephens, John K Saunders, Amit Trivedi, Douglas R Ewing, Vincent Iannace, Daniel Davis, Rafael F Capella, Annette Wasielewski, S Moran, Hans J Schmidt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The American Society of Bariatric Surgery has initiated a Bariatric Surgery Center of Excellence Program and the American College of Surgeons has followed with their Bariatric Surgery Center Network Accreditation Program. These programs postulate that concentration of weight loss operations in high-volume centers will decrease surgical mortality and improve outcomes.
METHODS: The purpose of this study was to calculate the in-hospital mortality for bariatric operations accomplished at the highest volume bariatric surgery center in the state of New Jersey. After receiving Institutional Revew Board approval, the revised surgical schedule was used to identify all patients undergoing weight loss surgery (WLS) at Hackensack University Medical Center from 1998 through June, 2006. Data for these patients were then harvested from the hospital's electronic medical record. Step-wise and univariate logistic regression analysis tested the impact of various factors on hospital length of stay and in-hospital mortality.
RESULTS: Between 1998 and June, 2006, 5,365 patients underwent WLS surgery: 2,099 open vertical banded gastroplasty-Roux en Y gastric bypass (VBG-RYGB); 2,177 laparoscopic Roux en Y gastric bypass (LRYGB); and 1,089 laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). 75.5% of patients were women. Median age was 41 years old (13-79), median weight 128 kg (81.2-290.3), and median body mass index 46.1 kg/m2 (35.0-92.6). Median total operating room time for VBG-RYGB was 115 min (33-328); LRYGB 155 min (53-493), and LAGB 92 min (33-274). Median length of stay for VBG-RYGB was 3 days (1-39 days), LRYGB 2 days (1-46 days), and LAGB 1 day (1-20). Seven patients died in hospital after the 5,365 WLS operations (0.13%): four after VBG-RYGB (0.19%); three after LRYGB (0.14%); and none after LAGB (0%). The characteristics of the patients who died did not significantly differ from the group as a whole.
CONCLUSION: Surgeons at Hackensack University Medical Center, a high volume, accredited 1A American College of Surgeons Bariatric Surgery Center, achieved a 0.13% mortality among 5,365 patients undergoing weight loss operations between 1998 and June, 2006. This study supports the concept that high-volume centers perform bariatric operations with low mortalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18386110     DOI: 10.1007/s11695-007-9357-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  37 in total

1.  An assessment of vertical banded gastroplasty-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity.

Authors:  Joseph F Capella; Rafael F Capella
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Short-term results of laparoscopic gastric bypass in patients with BMI > or = 60.

Authors:  David Oliak; Garth H Ballantyne; Richard J Davies; Annette Wasielewski; Hans J Schmidt
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Vertical banded gastroplasty versus adjustable gastric banding: prospective long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Karl Miller; A Pump; Emanuel Hell
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 4.734

4.  Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for severe obesity.

Authors:  R Ganesh; T Leese; A D Rao; H G Baladas
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.858

5.  Outcomes after open versus laparoscopic gastric bypass.

Authors:  Rocco Ricciardi; Robert J Town; Todd A Kellogg; Sayeed Ikramuddin; Nancy N Baxter
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.719

6.  Outcomes of bariatric surgery in the elderly.

Authors:  J Esteban Varela; Samuel E Wilson; Ninh T Nguyen
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.688

7.  Continued excellent results with the mini-gastric bypass: six-year study in 2,410 patients.

Authors:  Robert Rutledge; Thomas R Walsh
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Optimizing outcomes in bariatric surgery: outpatient laparoscopic gastric bypass.

Authors:  Todd M McCarty; David T Arnold; Jeffrey P Lamont; Tammy L Fisher; Joseph A Kuhn
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Patient characteristics impacting excess weight loss following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

Authors:  Wai Yip Chau; Hans J Schmidt; Wael Kouli; Dan Davis; Annette Wasielewski; Garth H Ballantyne
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  National study of the effect of patient and hospital characteristics on bariatric surgery outcomes.

Authors:  Alfredo M Carbonell; Amy E Lincourt; Brent D Matthews; Kent W Kercher; Ronald F Sing; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 0.688

View more
  12 in total

1.  The relationship between volume and outcome after bariatric surgery: a nationwide study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chong-Chi Chiu; Jhi-Joung Wang; Tsung-Chih Tsai; Chin-Chen Chu; Hon-Yi Shi
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Robotic vs. conventional laparoscopic gastric banding: a comparison of 407 cases.

Authors:  Paula K Edelson; Kristoffel R Dumon; Seema S Sonnad; Bilal M Shafi; Noel N Williams
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Complications and outcome after laparoscopic bariatric surgery: LAGB versus LRYGB.

Authors:  Nikolaus P Zuegel; Reinhold A Lang; Thomas P Hüttl; Marc Gleis; Marguerite Ketfi-Jungen; Isabelle Rasquin; Martin Kox
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Dietetic-led management of patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric banding: early results.

Authors:  Rishi Singhal; Mark Kitchen; Sue Bridgwater; Paul Super
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Association of cumulative surgeon volume and risk of complications in adult uvulopalatopharyngoplasty: a population-based study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Ying-Shuo Hsu; Wei-Chung Hsu; Jenq-Yuh Ko; Te-Huei Yeh; Chia-Hsuan Lee; Kun-Tai Kang
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 4.062

6.  Comparison of early and late complications after various bariatric procedures: incidence and treatment during 15 years at a single institution.

Authors:  George Skroubis; Stavros Karamanakos; George Sakellaropoulos; Konstantinos Panagopoulos; Fotis Kalfarentzos
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  The impact of accreditation on safety and cost of bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Steve Kwon; Bruce Wang; Edwin Wong; Rafael Alfonso-Cristancho; Sean D Sullivan; David R Flum
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 4.734

8.  Complications After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in 1573 Consecutive Patients: Are There Predictors?

Authors:  Anna Dayer-Jankechova; Pierre Fournier; Pierre Allemann; Michel Suter
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Low mortality in bariatric surgery 1995 through 2005 in Sweden, in spite of a shift to more complex procedures.

Authors:  Magnus Sundbom; Britt-Marie Karlson
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the morbidly obese patient.

Authors:  Jennifer Yates; Ravi Munver; Ihor Sawczuk
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2010-11-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.