Literature DB >> 17057571

Outcomes after open versus laparoscopic gastric bypass.

Rocco Ricciardi1, Robert J Town, Todd A Kellogg, Sayeed Ikramuddin, Nancy N Baxter.   

Abstract

In expert hands, laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGB) is associated with reduced morbidity and mortality compared with open bariatric surgery. The purpose of our study was to determine whether or not the results of LGB have been realized in the general US population. We used data from the nationwide inpatient sample to define differences in outcomes after LGB versus open techniques (OGB). We calculated hospital stay, in-hospital mortality, and major complications for both OGB and LGB. We noted a total of 26,940 gastric bypass procedures: LGB was coded in 16.3% and OGB in 83.7%. The mean hospital stay, mortality, wound, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, and cardiovascular complications were significantly lower after LGB (P<0.001). After we adjusted for covariates, hospital stay, pulmonary morbidity, and mortality remained significantly lower after LGB (P<0.001). In conclusion, LGB is associated with significantly lower mean hospital stay and with reduced morbidity and mortality as compared with OGB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17057571     DOI: 10.1097/01.sle.0000213730.65085.28

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  9 in total

1.  Commentary re: laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass.

Authors:  Kenneth B Jones
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Mortality and hospital stay after bariatric surgery in 2,167 patients: influence of the surgeon expertise.

Authors:  Silvana Márcia Bruschi Kelles; Sandhi Maria Barreto; Henrique Leonardo Guerra
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Bariatric surgery: low mortality at a high-volume center.

Authors:  Garth H Ballantyne; Scott Belsley; Daniel Stephens; John K Saunders; Amit Trivedi; Douglas R Ewing; Vincent Iannace; Daniel Davis; Rafael F Capella; Annette Wasielewski; S Moran; Hans J Schmidt
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  The application of comorbidity indices to predict early postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a nationwide comparative analysis of over 70,000 cases.

Authors:  Jin Hee Shin; Mathias Worni; Anthony W Castleberry; Ricardo Pietrobon; Philip A Omotosho; Mina Silberberg; Truls Østbye
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Disparate use of minimally invasive surgery in benign surgical conditions.

Authors:  Rocco Ricciardi; Harry P Selker; Nancy N Baxter; Peter W Marcello; Patricia L Roberts; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Metabolic syndrome after laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Clare Nugent; Chunhong Bai; Hazem Elariny; Priya Gopalakrishnan; Caitlin Quigley; Michael Garone; Mariam Afendy; Oscar Chan; Angela Wheeler; Arian Afendy; Zobair M Younossi
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Regional variations in gastric bypass surgery: results from the 2005 nationwide inpatient sample.

Authors:  Wendy E Weller; Carl Rosati
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Silicone-ring Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in the treatment of obesity: effects of laparoscopic versus laparotomic surgery on respiration.

Authors:  Marcela Cangussu Barbalho-Moulim; Gustavo Peixoto Soares Miguel; Eli Maria Pazzianotto Forti; Marcelo de Castro César; João Luiz Moreira Coutinho Azevedo; Dirceu Costa
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  3-year real-world outcomes with the Swedish adjustable gastric band™ in France.

Authors:  G Ribaric; J N Buchwald; G d'Orsay; F Daoud
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.129

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.